{"title":"进入一个复杂的市场:混合品牌如何帮助新品牌创造独特和共鸣的身份","authors":"Nicole Gorman, Pierre-Yann Dolbec","doi":"10.1007/s11747-024-01072-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In today’s competitive markets, creating a distinctive brand identity is crucial yet challenging, especially for new entrants. Complex markets with conflicting institutional logics offer unique opportunities to create a distinctive and resonant brand identity. We introduce hybrid branding as a novel strategy that resolves market-level cultural contradictions to create such identities. Our qualitative analysis of lingerie brand Savage X Fenty identifies four mechanisms of hybrid branding—selective adopting, selective distancing, juxtaposing, and integrating—through which the brand resolved contradictions between the conflicting ‘bombshell’ and ‘body-positive’ logics structuring the lingerie market to create an identity centered on inclusive sexual empowerment. We also identify threats that hybrid brands face: perceived deviations from logics, amplification of contradictions, and hybridization failures. We contribute to theory by introducing hybrid branding as a means of navigating institutional complexity and by identifying market complexity as a source of novel meaning creation. We also offer insights on managing brand authenticity, legitimacy, and hybrid brands.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entering a complex market: How hybrid branding helps new brands create distinctive and resonant identities\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Gorman, Pierre-Yann Dolbec\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-024-01072-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In today’s competitive markets, creating a distinctive brand identity is crucial yet challenging, especially for new entrants. Complex markets with conflicting institutional logics offer unique opportunities to create a distinctive and resonant brand identity. We introduce hybrid branding as a novel strategy that resolves market-level cultural contradictions to create such identities. Our qualitative analysis of lingerie brand Savage X Fenty identifies four mechanisms of hybrid branding—selective adopting, selective distancing, juxtaposing, and integrating—through which the brand resolved contradictions between the conflicting ‘bombshell’ and ‘body-positive’ logics structuring the lingerie market to create an identity centered on inclusive sexual empowerment. We also identify threats that hybrid brands face: perceived deviations from logics, amplification of contradictions, and hybridization failures. We contribute to theory by introducing hybrid branding as a means of navigating institutional complexity and by identifying market complexity as a source of novel meaning creation. We also offer insights on managing brand authenticity, legitimacy, and hybrid brands.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01072-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-024-01072-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在当今竞争激烈的市场中,创建一个独特的品牌标识至关重要,但也具有挑战性,尤其是对新进入者而言。复杂的市场与矛盾的制度逻辑提供了独特的机会,创造一个独特的和共鸣的品牌身份。我们引入混合品牌作为一种新颖的策略,解决市场层面的文化矛盾,创造这样的身份。通过对内衣品牌Savage X Fenty的定性分析,我们发现了四种混合品牌机制——选择性采用、选择性疏远、并置和整合——通过这种机制,该品牌解决了“重磅”和“身体积极”逻辑之间的矛盾,从而构建了内衣市场,创造了一个以包容性赋权为中心的身份。我们还指出了混合品牌面临的威胁:明显偏离逻辑、矛盾放大和混合失败。我们通过引入混合品牌作为一种导航制度复杂性的手段,并通过将市场复杂性确定为新意义创造的来源,为理论做出贡献。我们还提供管理品牌真实性、合法性和混合品牌的见解。
Entering a complex market: How hybrid branding helps new brands create distinctive and resonant identities
In today’s competitive markets, creating a distinctive brand identity is crucial yet challenging, especially for new entrants. Complex markets with conflicting institutional logics offer unique opportunities to create a distinctive and resonant brand identity. We introduce hybrid branding as a novel strategy that resolves market-level cultural contradictions to create such identities. Our qualitative analysis of lingerie brand Savage X Fenty identifies four mechanisms of hybrid branding—selective adopting, selective distancing, juxtaposing, and integrating—through which the brand resolved contradictions between the conflicting ‘bombshell’ and ‘body-positive’ logics structuring the lingerie market to create an identity centered on inclusive sexual empowerment. We also identify threats that hybrid brands face: perceived deviations from logics, amplification of contradictions, and hybridization failures. We contribute to theory by introducing hybrid branding as a means of navigating institutional complexity and by identifying market complexity as a source of novel meaning creation. We also offer insights on managing brand authenticity, legitimacy, and hybrid brands.
期刊介绍:
JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles.
When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.