Kazuki Noda, Yosuke Inoue, Yoshimasa Seike, Hitoshi Matsuda
{"title":"Surgical Outcomes Stratified by Type of Transportation and Presence of Coronary Reperfusion in Patients with Coronary Malperfusion Caused by Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Kazuki Noda, Yosuke Inoue, Yoshimasa Seike, Hitoshi Matsuda","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Owing to the time-sensitive nature of myocardial ischemia, challenging clinical scenarios should be considered in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD) complicated by coronary malperfusion. In clinical settings, the diagnosis and reperfusion strategies for coronary malperfusion often depend on institutional resources. This study evaluated early surgical outcomes in such patients, focusing on transportation type and clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients who underwent emergency surgery for AAAD with coronary malperfusion, excluding those with cardiac tamponade on arrival, between 1997 and February 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on transportation: direct transfer and referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, in-hospital mortality was 27%, with only 1 of 9 patients surviving with preoperative peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Mortality and morbidity did not significantly differ between groups. Univariate analysis identified left coronary artery involvement and preoperative hemodynamic instability as significant risk factors. Additionally, preoperative diagnostic-only coronary angiography (CAG) with unsuccessful reperfusion was a potential risk factor (P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of transportation type, preoperative peripheral ECMO itself could not be a definitive solution in AAAD patients with coronary malperfusion. Also, patients who underwent preoperative CAG with unsuccessful reperfusion might be fatal, especially with suspected left coronary artery involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于心肌缺血的时间敏感性,A型急性主动脉夹层(AAAD)合并冠状动脉灌注不良患者应考虑具有挑战性的临床情况。在临床环境中,冠状动脉灌注不良的诊断和再灌注策略往往取决于机构资源。本研究评估了此类患者的早期手术结果,重点关注转运类型和临床处理。方法:我们回顾性分析了1997年至2024年2月期间70例急诊手术治疗AAAD合并冠状动脉灌注不良的患者,不包括到达时有心脏填塞的患者。根据交通方式将患者分为两组:直接转诊组和转诊组。结果:总体而言,住院死亡率为27%,术前外周体外膜氧合(ECMO) 9例患者中只有1例存活。两组间死亡率和发病率无显著差异。单因素分析确定左冠状动脉受累和术前血流动力学不稳定是重要的危险因素。此外,术前仅诊断冠状动脉造影(CAG)再灌注不成功是一个潜在的危险因素(P = 0.06)。结论:无论转运方式如何,术前外周ECMO本身并不是AAAD冠状动脉灌注不良患者的决定性解决方案。此外,术前CAG再灌注不成功的患者可能是致命的,特别是怀疑左冠状动脉受累的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Outcomes Stratified by Type of Transportation and Presence of Coronary Reperfusion in Patients with Coronary Malperfusion Caused by Type A Aortic Dissection.

Purpose: Owing to the time-sensitive nature of myocardial ischemia, challenging clinical scenarios should be considered in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD) complicated by coronary malperfusion. In clinical settings, the diagnosis and reperfusion strategies for coronary malperfusion often depend on institutional resources. This study evaluated early surgical outcomes in such patients, focusing on transportation type and clinical management.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients who underwent emergency surgery for AAAD with coronary malperfusion, excluding those with cardiac tamponade on arrival, between 1997 and February 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on transportation: direct transfer and referral.

Results: Overall, in-hospital mortality was 27%, with only 1 of 9 patients surviving with preoperative peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Mortality and morbidity did not significantly differ between groups. Univariate analysis identified left coronary artery involvement and preoperative hemodynamic instability as significant risk factors. Additionally, preoperative diagnostic-only coronary angiography (CAG) with unsuccessful reperfusion was a potential risk factor (P = 0.06).

Conclusions: Regardless of transportation type, preoperative peripheral ECMO itself could not be a definitive solution in AAAD patients with coronary malperfusion. Also, patients who underwent preoperative CAG with unsuccessful reperfusion might be fatal, especially with suspected left coronary artery involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信