{"title":"过渡到快速响应代码的病人信息传单交付。","authors":"Githa Singh, Sarel J. Brand, Vanessa Steenkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The inclusion of a patient information leaflet (PIL) in medicine packaging is a legal requirement in most countries.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility of using quick response (QR) codes for electronic patient information leaflet (ePIL) delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed-method study based on surveys was conducted at the Tshwane District Hospital in South Africa. The demographics, ability and willingness of patients (330) and pharmacy staff (16) to scan a QR code for a commonly prescribed medicine was captured. A focus group study among 18 regulatory affairs pharmacists gauged their perception of ease of implementation of QR codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 330 patients, most were 26–55 years of age (67 %) and 70 % were female. Irrespective of patient age and gender, >80 % were willing/ able to scan the QR code and preferred the ePIL (35 %) or ePIL with a hardcopy (45 %). Patients (>96 %) found it easy to read the ePIL (<em>C</em> = 0.487, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and locate the information sought (<em>C</em> = 0.521, <em>p</em> < 0.001). This sentiment was shared by dispensing pharmacy staff: easier to read (<em>C</em> = 0.746, <em>p</em> < 0.05) and locate information (<em>C</em> = 0.630, <em>p</em> < 0.05), with 69 % preferring either the ePIL or ePIL with a hardcopy. All the regulatory affairs pharmacists preferred the ePIL and indicated that it was easy to create a QR code for ePILs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients, dispensing pharmacy staff, and regulatory affairs pharmacists are willing to transition to ePILs. This makes going green and updating information in real time possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning to quick response codes for patient information leaflet delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Githa Singh, Sarel J. Brand, Vanessa Steenkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The inclusion of a patient information leaflet (PIL) in medicine packaging is a legal requirement in most countries.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility of using quick response (QR) codes for electronic patient information leaflet (ePIL) delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed-method study based on surveys was conducted at the Tshwane District Hospital in South Africa. The demographics, ability and willingness of patients (330) and pharmacy staff (16) to scan a QR code for a commonly prescribed medicine was captured. A focus group study among 18 regulatory affairs pharmacists gauged their perception of ease of implementation of QR codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 330 patients, most were 26–55 years of age (67 %) and 70 % were female. Irrespective of patient age and gender, >80 % were willing/ able to scan the QR code and preferred the ePIL (35 %) or ePIL with a hardcopy (45 %). Patients (>96 %) found it easy to read the ePIL (<em>C</em> = 0.487, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and locate the information sought (<em>C</em> = 0.521, <em>p</em> < 0.001). This sentiment was shared by dispensing pharmacy staff: easier to read (<em>C</em> = 0.746, <em>p</em> < 0.05) and locate information (<em>C</em> = 0.630, <em>p</em> < 0.05), with 69 % preferring either the ePIL or ePIL with a hardcopy. All the regulatory affairs pharmacists preferred the ePIL and indicated that it was easy to create a QR code for ePILs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients, dispensing pharmacy staff, and regulatory affairs pharmacists are willing to transition to ePILs. This makes going green and updating information in real time possible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在药品包装中包含患者信息传单(PIL)是大多数国家的法律要求。目的:探讨快速反应码(QR码)在电子患者信息单张(ePIL)发放中的可行性。方法:在南非Tshwane地区医院进行了一项基于调查的混合方法研究。收集了330名患者和16名药房工作人员扫描常用处方药二维码的人口统计信息、能力和意愿。一项针对18名监管事务药剂师的焦点小组研究衡量了他们对QR码实施难易程度的看法。结果:330例患者中,年龄以26 ~ 55岁居多(67%),女性占70%。无论患者的年龄和性别如何,大约80%的患者愿意/能够扫描QR码,并且更喜欢使用ePIL(35%)或带有硬拷贝的ePIL(45%)。患者认为ePIL易于阅读(C = 0.487, p = 0.521, p = 0.746, p = 0.630, p) (bbb96 %)。结论:患者、调剂药房工作人员和法规事务药师都愿意过渡到ePIL。这使得绿色环保和实时更新信息成为可能。
Transitioning to quick response codes for patient information leaflet delivery.
Background
The inclusion of a patient information leaflet (PIL) in medicine packaging is a legal requirement in most countries.
Objective
To evaluate the feasibility of using quick response (QR) codes for electronic patient information leaflet (ePIL) delivery.
Method
A mixed-method study based on surveys was conducted at the Tshwane District Hospital in South Africa. The demographics, ability and willingness of patients (330) and pharmacy staff (16) to scan a QR code for a commonly prescribed medicine was captured. A focus group study among 18 regulatory affairs pharmacists gauged their perception of ease of implementation of QR codes.
Results
Of the 330 patients, most were 26–55 years of age (67 %) and 70 % were female. Irrespective of patient age and gender, >80 % were willing/ able to scan the QR code and preferred the ePIL (35 %) or ePIL with a hardcopy (45 %). Patients (>96 %) found it easy to read the ePIL (C = 0.487, p < 0.001) and locate the information sought (C = 0.521, p < 0.001). This sentiment was shared by dispensing pharmacy staff: easier to read (C = 0.746, p < 0.05) and locate information (C = 0.630, p < 0.05), with 69 % preferring either the ePIL or ePIL with a hardcopy. All the regulatory affairs pharmacists preferred the ePIL and indicated that it was easy to create a QR code for ePILs.
Conclusion
Patients, dispensing pharmacy staff, and regulatory affairs pharmacists are willing to transition to ePILs. This makes going green and updating information in real time possible.