探索出院处方中潜在的药物-药物相互作用:ChatGPT在评估这些相互作用方面的有效性。

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Rahi Bikram Thapa , Subash Karki , Sabin Shrestha
{"title":"探索出院处方中潜在的药物-药物相互作用:ChatGPT在评估这些相互作用方面的有效性。","authors":"Rahi Bikram Thapa ,&nbsp;Subash Karki ,&nbsp;Sabin Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions\",\"authors\":\"Rahi Bikram Thapa ,&nbsp;Subash Karki ,&nbsp;Sabin Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:潜在的药物-药物相互作用(pddi)在临床实践中构成了巨大的风险,导致发病率、死亡率和医疗费用的增加。像Micromedex药物相互作用检查器这样的工具通常用于筛选pDDI,而新兴的人工智能模型,如ChatGPT,提供了补充pDDI预测的潜力。然而,这些人工智能工具在临床环境中的准确性和可靠性在很大程度上仍未经测试。目的:本研究评估内科病房患者出院处方中的pddi,并与Micromedex药物-药物相互作用检查器相比,评估ChatGPT-4.0在预测这些相互作用方面的有效性。方法:对301例出院患者进行为期3个月的横断面研究。使用Micromedex药物相互作用检查器确定pddi,详细说明每种相互作用的发生、严重程度、发病和记录。然后根据Micromedex数据分析ChatGPT-4.0预测。采用二元logistic回归分析评估预测变量对pddi发生的影响。结果:301例患者共使用1551种药物,平均5.15种/例。60.13%的患者检测到pddi,平均每位患者3.17个pddi, ChatGPT-4.0准确识别pddi(发生率100%),但对严重程度的准确性有限(37.3%),对发病的准确性中等(65.2%)。最常见的主要相互作用是头孢呋辛酯和泮托拉唑钠。结论:内科出院处方中pddi普遍存在,且多种用药增加了pddi的风险(OR: 3.960, p)。虽然ChatGPT 4.0准确地识别了pDDI的发生,但它在预测严重程度、发病和记录方面的局限性强调了医疗保健专业人员需要仔细监督。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions

Background

Potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) pose substantial risks in clinical practice, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Tools like Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker are commonly used to screen for pDDIs, yet emerging AI models, such as ChatGPT, offer the potential for supplementary pDDI prediction. However, the accuracy and reliability of these AI tools in a clinical context remain largely untested.

Objective

This study evaluates pDDIs in discharge prescriptions for medical ward patients and assesses ChatGPT-4.0's effectiveness in predicting these interactions compared to Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted over three months with 301 discharged patients. pDDIs were identified using Micromedex drug-drug interaction checker, detailing each interaction's occurrence, severity, onset, and documentation. ChatGPT-4.0 predictions were then analyzed against Micromedex data. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the influence of predictor variables in the occurrence of pDDIs.

Results

1551 drugs were prescribed to 301 patients, averaging 5.15 per patient. pDDIs were detected in 60.13 % of patients, averaging 3.17 pDDIs per patient, ChatGPT-4.0 accurately identified pDDIs (100 % for occurrence) but had limited accuracy for severity (37.3 %) and moderate accuracy for onset (65.2 %). The most frequent major interaction was between Cefuroxime Axetil and Pantoprazole Sodium. Polypharmacy significantly increased the risk of pDDIs (OR: 3.960, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

pDDIs are prevalent in internal medicine discharge prescriptions, with polypharmacy heightening the risk. While ChatGPT 4.0 accurately identifies pDDI occurrence, its limitations in predicting severity, onset, and documentation underscore healthcare professionals' need for careful oversight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信