“一个健康”治理策略与机制:以中国为例

Xinchen Li , Yanyan Zhang , Qiyu Zhang , Jingshu Liu , Zelin Zhu , Xinyu Feng , Lefei Han , Xiaoxi Zhang
{"title":"“一个健康”治理策略与机制:以中国为例","authors":"Xinchen Li ,&nbsp;Yanyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingshu Liu ,&nbsp;Zelin Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinyu Feng ,&nbsp;Lefei Han ,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.soh.2024.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Strategy and mechanism are crucial components of One Health governance in China, designed to address the interconnected health issues between humans, animals, and the environment. This study aims to evaluate China's current One Health governance framework, identify key strengths and gaps, and provide recommendations for establishing a more integrated and effective system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative approach was employed, including in-depth interviews, policy analysis, and a review of existing literature, to evaluate the strengths and gaps in China's One Health framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis identified progress and challenges in six key areas: (1) political commitment: strong national support exists, but lacks a unified strategy; (2) legislation and regulation: notable legislative efforts are in place, yet they remain fragmented; (3) leadership building: effective leadership structures have been established during crises but are not institutionalized; (4) strategic planning: initial regional planning is underway, but a comprehensive national focus is needed; (5) coordination and communication: mechanisms exist but require formalized, consistent information-sharing channels; (6) stakeholder engagement: public and academic awareness is growing, yet local community involvement needs strengthening.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To advance its One Health governance, China must focus on creating a unified strategy, enhancing interdepartmental coordination, and deepening stakeholder engagement, ensuring its alignment with international standards and improving public health outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101146,"journal":{"name":"Science in One Health","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategy and mechanism of One Health governance: case study of China\",\"authors\":\"Xinchen Li ,&nbsp;Yanyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingshu Liu ,&nbsp;Zelin Zhu ,&nbsp;Xinyu Feng ,&nbsp;Lefei Han ,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soh.2024.100098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Strategy and mechanism are crucial components of One Health governance in China, designed to address the interconnected health issues between humans, animals, and the environment. This study aims to evaluate China's current One Health governance framework, identify key strengths and gaps, and provide recommendations for establishing a more integrated and effective system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative approach was employed, including in-depth interviews, policy analysis, and a review of existing literature, to evaluate the strengths and gaps in China's One Health framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis identified progress and challenges in six key areas: (1) political commitment: strong national support exists, but lacks a unified strategy; (2) legislation and regulation: notable legislative efforts are in place, yet they remain fragmented; (3) leadership building: effective leadership structures have been established during crises but are not institutionalized; (4) strategic planning: initial regional planning is underway, but a comprehensive national focus is needed; (5) coordination and communication: mechanisms exist but require formalized, consistent information-sharing channels; (6) stakeholder engagement: public and academic awareness is growing, yet local community involvement needs strengthening.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To advance its One Health governance, China must focus on creating a unified strategy, enhancing interdepartmental coordination, and deepening stakeholder engagement, ensuring its alignment with international standards and improving public health outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science in One Health\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science in One Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704324000374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science in One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949704324000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:战略和机制是中国“同一个健康”治理的关键组成部分,旨在解决人类、动物和环境之间相互关联的健康问题。本研究旨在评估中国目前的“一个健康”治理框架,确定其主要优势和差距,并为建立一个更完整、更有效的体系提供建议。方法:采用定性方法,包括深度访谈、政策分析和现有文献综述,来评估中国“一个健康”框架的优势和差距。结果:分析确定了六个关键领域的进展和挑战:(1)政治承诺:有强有力的国家支持,但缺乏统一的战略;(2)立法和监管:立法努力显著,但仍然分散;(3)领导力建设:危机期间建立了有效的领导结构,但没有制度化;(4)战略规划:初步的区域规划正在进行,但需要一个全面的国家重点;(5)协调与沟通:存在相关机制,但需要有形式化、一致的信息共享渠道;(6)利益相关者参与:公众和学术界的意识正在增强,但地方社区的参与需要加强。结论:为了推进“一个健康”治理,中国必须重点制定统一战略,加强部门间协调,深化利益相关者参与,确保与国际标准保持一致,并改善公共卫生成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategy and mechanism of One Health governance: case study of China

Background

Strategy and mechanism are crucial components of One Health governance in China, designed to address the interconnected health issues between humans, animals, and the environment. This study aims to evaluate China's current One Health governance framework, identify key strengths and gaps, and provide recommendations for establishing a more integrated and effective system.

Methods

A qualitative approach was employed, including in-depth interviews, policy analysis, and a review of existing literature, to evaluate the strengths and gaps in China's One Health framework.

Results

The analysis identified progress and challenges in six key areas: (1) political commitment: strong national support exists, but lacks a unified strategy; (2) legislation and regulation: notable legislative efforts are in place, yet they remain fragmented; (3) leadership building: effective leadership structures have been established during crises but are not institutionalized; (4) strategic planning: initial regional planning is underway, but a comprehensive national focus is needed; (5) coordination and communication: mechanisms exist but require formalized, consistent information-sharing channels; (6) stakeholder engagement: public and academic awareness is growing, yet local community involvement needs strengthening.

Conclusion

To advance its One Health governance, China must focus on creating a unified strategy, enhancing interdepartmental coordination, and deepening stakeholder engagement, ensuring its alignment with international standards and improving public health outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信