神经性厌食症患者的强化学习:混合强化学习/漂移扩散模型的初步研究。

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christina E Wierenga, Amanda Bischoff-Grethe, Carina S Brown, Gregory G Brown
{"title":"神经性厌食症患者的强化学习:混合强化学习/漂移扩散模型的初步研究。","authors":"Christina E Wierenga, Amanda Bischoff-Grethe, Carina S Brown, Gregory G Brown","doi":"10.1017/S1355617725000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Altered reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-making have been implicated in the pathophysiology of anorexia nervosa. To determine whether deficits observed in symptomatic anorexia nervosa are also present in remission, we investigated RL in women remitted from anorexia nervosa (rAN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task that involved learning from rewarding or punishing outcomes across consecutive sets of stimuli to examine generalization of learning to new stimuli over extended task exposure. We fit a hybrid RL and drift diffusion model of associative learning to model learning and decision-making processes in 24 rAN and 20 female community controls (cCN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rAN showed better learning from negative outcomes than cCN and this was greater over extended task exposure (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .30). rAN demonstrated a reduction in accuracy of optimal choices (<i>p</i> = .007, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .16) and rate of information extraction on reward trials from set 1 to set 2 (<i>p</i> = .012, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .14), and a larger reduction of response threshold separation from set 1 to set 2 than cCN (<i>p</i> = .036, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rAN extracted less information from rewarding stimuli and their learning became increasingly sensitive to negative outcomes over learning trials. This suggests rAN shifted attention to learning from negative feedback while slowing down extraction of information from rewarding stimuli. Better learning from negative over positive feedback in rAN might reflect a marker of recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinforcement learning in women remitted from anorexia nervosa: Preliminary examination with a hybrid reinforcement learning/drift diffusion model.\",\"authors\":\"Christina E Wierenga, Amanda Bischoff-Grethe, Carina S Brown, Gregory G Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1355617725000013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Altered reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-making have been implicated in the pathophysiology of anorexia nervosa. To determine whether deficits observed in symptomatic anorexia nervosa are also present in remission, we investigated RL in women remitted from anorexia nervosa (rAN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task that involved learning from rewarding or punishing outcomes across consecutive sets of stimuli to examine generalization of learning to new stimuli over extended task exposure. We fit a hybrid RL and drift diffusion model of associative learning to model learning and decision-making processes in 24 rAN and 20 female community controls (cCN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>rAN showed better learning from negative outcomes than cCN and this was greater over extended task exposure (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .30). rAN demonstrated a reduction in accuracy of optimal choices (<i>p</i> = .007, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .16) and rate of information extraction on reward trials from set 1 to set 2 (<i>p</i> = .012, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .14), and a larger reduction of response threshold separation from set 1 to set 2 than cCN (<i>p</i> = .036, <i>η<sub>p</sub></i><sup>2</sup> = .10).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>rAN extracted less information from rewarding stimuli and their learning became increasingly sensitive to negative outcomes over learning trials. This suggests rAN shifted attention to learning from negative feedback while slowing down extraction of information from rewarding stimuli. Better learning from negative over positive feedback in rAN might reflect a marker of recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725000013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725000013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨神经性厌食症的病理生理机制与强化学习(RL)和决策的改变有关。为了确定在症状性神经性厌食症中观察到的缺陷是否也存在于缓解期,我们调查了神经性厌食症(rAN)缓解期女性的RL。方法:参与者执行一个概率联想学习任务,包括从连续刺激组的奖励或惩罚结果中学习,以检验在延长任务暴露中对新刺激的学习泛化。我们拟合了一个混合RL和漂移扩散的联想学习模型,对24名男性和20名女性社区对照(cCN)的学习和决策过程进行了建模。结果:rAN表现出比cCN更好的从负面结果中学习,这在延长任务暴露中表现得更明显(p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.30)。与cCN相比,rAN降低了最优选择的准确性(p = 0.007, ηp2 = 0.16)和从集合1到集合2的奖励试验的信息提取率(p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.14),并且从集合1到集合2的响应阈值分离降低幅度更大(p = 0.036, ηp2 = 0.10)。结论:rAN从奖励刺激中提取的信息较少,他们的学习对负面结果越来越敏感。这表明rAN将注意力转移到从负面反馈中学习,同时减缓了从奖励刺激中提取信息的速度。在rAN中,从负反馈中比从正反馈中更好地学习可能反映了恢复的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinforcement learning in women remitted from anorexia nervosa: Preliminary examination with a hybrid reinforcement learning/drift diffusion model.

Objective: Altered reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-making have been implicated in the pathophysiology of anorexia nervosa. To determine whether deficits observed in symptomatic anorexia nervosa are also present in remission, we investigated RL in women remitted from anorexia nervosa (rAN).

Methods: Participants performed a probabilistic associative learning task that involved learning from rewarding or punishing outcomes across consecutive sets of stimuli to examine generalization of learning to new stimuli over extended task exposure. We fit a hybrid RL and drift diffusion model of associative learning to model learning and decision-making processes in 24 rAN and 20 female community controls (cCN).

Results: rAN showed better learning from negative outcomes than cCN and this was greater over extended task exposure (p < .001, ηp2 = .30). rAN demonstrated a reduction in accuracy of optimal choices (p = .007, ηp2 = .16) and rate of information extraction on reward trials from set 1 to set 2 (p = .012, ηp2 = .14), and a larger reduction of response threshold separation from set 1 to set 2 than cCN (p = .036, ηp2 = .10).

Conclusions: rAN extracted less information from rewarding stimuli and their learning became increasingly sensitive to negative outcomes over learning trials. This suggests rAN shifted attention to learning from negative feedback while slowing down extraction of information from rewarding stimuli. Better learning from negative over positive feedback in rAN might reflect a marker of recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信