{"title":"两种肠道病毒71型疫苗免疫监测后的不良事件:中国现实世界的比较研究","authors":"Yiqing Zhu, Yihan Wang, Jinghui Wang, Yafei Wang, Li Sun, Shiheng Cui, Jing Li, Yu Guo","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2025.2458831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To comprehensively assess the safety and difference of two types of EV71 vaccines: EV71-Vero, produced using Vero cells and EV71-H2, using human diploid cells. Our research included children of the recommended age who voluntarily received the EV71 vaccine in Hebei Province from 2019 to 2023. Detailed data on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) were collected, analyzed and compared for EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines. With 477 AEFI reported, the reported rate was 14.21 per 100,000 doses. Most cases occurred in infants under one year of age (45.91%). No significant differences in the AEFI reported rate were found between two types of EV71 vaccines across various demographic. However, a higher number of AEFI was reported in children under 1-year old following EV71-Vero compared to EV71-H2 with a reversal in 4-5 years- group (<i>χ</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 13.90, <i>p</i> = .01). The prognosis of cured took higher proportion for EV71-Vero than for EV71-H2 while inversely with improved outcome. The EV71 vaccine is advisable recommend to the appropriate age children to prevent EV7l infection. Both the EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines have good safety profiles. The reported AEFI, primarily high fever and allergic reactions, showed no significant differences in reported rates or case characteristics between the two types.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"21 1","pages":"2458831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events following immunization surveillance on two types of enterovirus 71 vaccines: A real-world comparative study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yiqing Zhu, Yihan Wang, Jinghui Wang, Yafei Wang, Li Sun, Shiheng Cui, Jing Li, Yu Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21645515.2025.2458831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To comprehensively assess the safety and difference of two types of EV71 vaccines: EV71-Vero, produced using Vero cells and EV71-H2, using human diploid cells. Our research included children of the recommended age who voluntarily received the EV71 vaccine in Hebei Province from 2019 to 2023. Detailed data on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) were collected, analyzed and compared for EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines. With 477 AEFI reported, the reported rate was 14.21 per 100,000 doses. Most cases occurred in infants under one year of age (45.91%). No significant differences in the AEFI reported rate were found between two types of EV71 vaccines across various demographic. However, a higher number of AEFI was reported in children under 1-year old following EV71-Vero compared to EV71-H2 with a reversal in 4-5 years- group (<i>χ</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 13.90, <i>p</i> = .01). The prognosis of cured took higher proportion for EV71-Vero than for EV71-H2 while inversely with improved outcome. The EV71 vaccine is advisable recommend to the appropriate age children to prevent EV7l infection. Both the EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines have good safety profiles. The reported AEFI, primarily high fever and allergic reactions, showed no significant differences in reported rates or case characteristics between the two types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"2458831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792819/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2458831\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2458831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
综合评价两种EV71疫苗的安全性和差异:使用Vero细胞生产的EV71-Vero和使用人二倍体细胞生产的EV71- h2。我们的研究包括河北省2019 - 2023年自愿接种EV71疫苗的推荐年龄儿童。收集、分析和比较了EV71-Vero和EV71-H2疫苗免疫后不良事件的详细数据。报告了477例AEFI,报告的发生率为每10万剂14.21例。以1岁以下婴幼儿居多(45.91%)。两种类型的EV71疫苗在不同人群中报告的AEFI率没有显著差异。然而,与EV71-H2组相比,EV71-Vero组1岁以下儿童的AEFI发生率较高,4-5岁组出现逆转(χ2 = 13.90, p = 0.01)。EV71-Vero的治愈预后比例高于EV71-H2,而与预后改善成反比。建议适当年龄的儿童接种EV71疫苗,以预防EV71感染。EV71-Vero和EV71-H2疫苗均具有良好的安全性。报告的AEFI,主要是高烧和过敏反应,在两种类型的报告率或病例特征上没有显着差异。
Adverse events following immunization surveillance on two types of enterovirus 71 vaccines: A real-world comparative study in China.
To comprehensively assess the safety and difference of two types of EV71 vaccines: EV71-Vero, produced using Vero cells and EV71-H2, using human diploid cells. Our research included children of the recommended age who voluntarily received the EV71 vaccine in Hebei Province from 2019 to 2023. Detailed data on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) were collected, analyzed and compared for EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines. With 477 AEFI reported, the reported rate was 14.21 per 100,000 doses. Most cases occurred in infants under one year of age (45.91%). No significant differences in the AEFI reported rate were found between two types of EV71 vaccines across various demographic. However, a higher number of AEFI was reported in children under 1-year old following EV71-Vero compared to EV71-H2 with a reversal in 4-5 years- group (χ2 = 13.90, p = .01). The prognosis of cured took higher proportion for EV71-Vero than for EV71-H2 while inversely with improved outcome. The EV71 vaccine is advisable recommend to the appropriate age children to prevent EV7l infection. Both the EV71-Vero and EV71-H2 vaccines have good safety profiles. The reported AEFI, primarily high fever and allergic reactions, showed no significant differences in reported rates or case characteristics between the two types.
期刊介绍:
(formerly Human Vaccines; issn 1554-8619)
Vaccine research and development is extending its reach beyond the prevention of bacterial or viral diseases. There are experimental vaccines for immunotherapeutic purposes and for applications outside of infectious diseases, in diverse fields such as cancer, autoimmunity, allergy, Alzheimer’s and addiction. Many of these vaccines and immunotherapeutics should become available in the next two decades, with consequent benefit for human health. Continued advancement in this field will benefit from a forum that can (A) help to promote interest by keeping investigators updated, and (B) enable an exchange of ideas regarding the latest progress in the many topics pertaining to vaccines and immunotherapeutics.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics provides such a forum. It is published monthly in a format that is accessible to a wide international audience in the academic, industrial and public sectors.