Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul
{"title":"慢性鼻鼻窦炎伴息肉的鼻腔皮质类固醇给药方法:系统综述。","authors":"Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1502-1511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本系统综述评价和比较不同鼻内皮质类固醇给药方法治疗慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的疗效和安全性。数据来源:Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)、PubMed和Web of Science从1980年1月1日到2024年1月9日进行系统检索。综述方法:两名独立的综述者检索了4个数据库的英文前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT),比较了皮质类固醇治疗CRSwNP的不同给药方法。研究因特定原因(错误的比较、错误的干预、错误的患者群体和错误的给药途径)而被排除。结果:数据检索确定了2282项研究。在剔除重复项后,1503项研究通过标题和摘要进行筛选,1479项因不符合标准而被排除。评估了18篇全文文章的合格性,并纳入了5项随机对照试验。雾化器、气雾剂和鼻滴等短期和长期治疗方法均显示出与口服皮质类固醇(OCS)相似的疗效,但安全性更好。长期使用水样喷雾剂有临床改善,但效果不如其他非水样给药方法。结论:非水给药方法,包括喷雾器、气溶胶喷雾剂和滴鼻剂,是一种安全的替代OCS的方法,没有全身副作用。应告知使用含水制剂的患者长期坚持治疗以改善症状的重要性。
Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review.
Objective: This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).
Data sources: Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.
Review methods: Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).
Results: The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.
Conclusion: Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.
期刊介绍:
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.