慢性鼻鼻窦炎伴息肉的鼻腔皮质类固醇给药方法:系统综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1147
Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul
{"title":"慢性鼻鼻窦炎伴息肉的鼻腔皮质类固醇给药方法:系统综述。","authors":"Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Robert E Gurevich, Ajibola B Bakare, Dylan A Levy, Edward D McCoul\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1502-1511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述评价和比较不同鼻内皮质类固醇给药方法治疗慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的疗效和安全性。数据来源:Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)、PubMed和Web of Science从1980年1月1日到2024年1月9日进行系统检索。综述方法:两名独立的综述者检索了4个数据库的英文前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT),比较了皮质类固醇治疗CRSwNP的不同给药方法。研究因特定原因(错误的比较、错误的干预、错误的患者群体和错误的给药途径)而被排除。结果:数据检索确定了2282项研究。在剔除重复项后,1503项研究通过标题和摘要进行筛选,1479项因不符合标准而被排除。评估了18篇全文文章的合格性,并纳入了5项随机对照试验。雾化器、气雾剂和鼻滴等短期和长期治疗方法均显示出与口服皮质类固醇(OCS)相似的疗效,但安全性更好。长期使用水样喷雾剂有临床改善,但效果不如其他非水样给药方法。结论:非水给药方法,包括喷雾器、气溶胶喷雾剂和滴鼻剂,是一种安全的替代OCS的方法,没有全身副作用。应告知使用含水制剂的患者长期坚持治疗以改善症状的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review.

Objective: This systematic review evaluates and compares the efficacy and safety of different intranasal corticosteroid delivery methods for treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

Data sources: Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1, 1980 to January 9, 2024.

Review methods: Two independent reviewers searched 4 databases for English-language, prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT), comparing different delivery methods of corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP. Studies were excluded for specific reasons (wrong comparisons, wrong intervention, wrong patient population, and wrong route of administration).

Results: The data search identified 2282 studies. After removing duplicates, 1503 studies were screened by title and abstract, with 1479 excluded for not meeting criteria. Eighteen full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 5 RCTs were included in the review. Both short- and long-term treatments with nebulizer, aerosol spray, and nasal drop methods demonstrated similar efficacy to oral corticosteroids (OCS) but with a better safety profile. Long-term use of aqueous sprays showed clinical improvement but was less effective than other non-aqueous delivery methods.

Conclusion: Non-aqueous delivery methods, including nebulizers, aerosol sprays, and nasal drops offer a safe alternative to OCS without systemic side effects. Patients using aqueous formulations should be advised on the importance of long-term adherence to achieve symptom improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信