多发性硬化症认知量表(MSCS):患者报告的认知困难的一个简短的心理计量学稳健度量。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1177/13524585241309805
James F Sumowski, Joshua Sandry
{"title":"多发性硬化症认知量表(MSCS):患者报告的认知困难的一个简短的心理计量学稳健度量。","authors":"James F Sumowski, Joshua Sandry","doi":"10.1177/13524585241309805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing metrics of patient-reported cognitive difficulties in multiple sclerosis (MS) are lengthy, lack psychometric rigor, and/or fail to query prevalent expressive language deficits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits that includes language items; the Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on 20 Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) items plus five newly developed language questions in a large MS sample and matched respondents without neurologic disease. Independent confirmatory principal components analysis (PCA) assessed EFA factor structure. Reliability of the new scale and subscales, and relationships with objective cognitive impairment and cognitive change, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA in patients (<i>n</i> = 502) and controls (<i>n</i> = 350), item analyses, and confirmatory PCA in an independent sample (<i>n</i> = 361 patients; 150 controls) supported construction of an eight-item scale with four two-item subscales: Executive/Speed, Working Memory, Expressive Language, and Episodic Memory. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent for the total MSCS (<i>α</i> = 0.93, ICC = 0.95) and good for each subscale (<i>α</i>'s:0.83-0.87; ICCs: 0.86-0.92). MSCS showed medium-size links to cross-sectional objective cognitive impairment (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = .06) and cognitive change over time (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = .07); the traditional PDQ did not (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup>s = 0.01 and 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The brief MSCS is a psychometrically robust, reliable, and valid metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits in MS that holds promise for improving assessment of MS cognitive dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"352-362"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS): A brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive difficulty.\",\"authors\":\"James F Sumowski, Joshua Sandry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13524585241309805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing metrics of patient-reported cognitive difficulties in multiple sclerosis (MS) are lengthy, lack psychometric rigor, and/or fail to query prevalent expressive language deficits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits that includes language items; the Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on 20 Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) items plus five newly developed language questions in a large MS sample and matched respondents without neurologic disease. Independent confirmatory principal components analysis (PCA) assessed EFA factor structure. Reliability of the new scale and subscales, and relationships with objective cognitive impairment and cognitive change, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA in patients (<i>n</i> = 502) and controls (<i>n</i> = 350), item analyses, and confirmatory PCA in an independent sample (<i>n</i> = 361 patients; 150 controls) supported construction of an eight-item scale with four two-item subscales: Executive/Speed, Working Memory, Expressive Language, and Episodic Memory. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent for the total MSCS (<i>α</i> = 0.93, ICC = 0.95) and good for each subscale (<i>α</i>'s:0.83-0.87; ICCs: 0.86-0.92). MSCS showed medium-size links to cross-sectional objective cognitive impairment (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = .06) and cognitive change over time (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = .07); the traditional PDQ did not (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup>s = 0.01 and 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The brief MSCS is a psychometrically robust, reliable, and valid metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits in MS that holds promise for improving assessment of MS cognitive dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"352-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11907727/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Sclerosis Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241309805\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585241309805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多发性硬化症(MS)患者报告的认知困难的现有指标冗长,缺乏心理测量的严谨性,和/或未能查询普遍的表达性语言缺陷。目的:开发一个简短的心理测量稳健的衡量标准,病人报告的认知缺陷,包括语言项目;多发性硬化认知量表(MSCS)方法:采用探索性因素分析(EFA)方法,对20个认知缺陷问卷(PDQ)题项和5个新开发的语言题项进行分析。独立验证性主成分分析(PCA)评估EFA因子结构。评估新量表及其子量表的可靠性,以及与客观认知障碍和认知改变的关系。结果:患者(n = 502)和对照组(n = 350)的EFA,独立样本(n = 361)的项目分析和验证性PCA;150个对照)支持构建一个8项量表,其中包含4个2项子量表:执行/速度、工作记忆、表达性语言和情景记忆。总体MSCS的内部一致性和重测信度较好(α = 0.93, ICC = 0.95),各子量表的内部一致性和重测信度较好(α = 0.83-0.87;可以:0.86 - -0.92)。MSCS与横断面客观认知障碍(η2 = .06)和随时间变化的认知变化(η2 = .07)存在中等程度的联系;传统PDQ无显著差异(η2s = 0.01和0.02)。结论:简短的MSCS是一种心理测量学上稳健、可靠和有效的MS患者报告的认知缺陷指标,有望改善MS认知功能障碍的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS): A brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive difficulty.

Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS): A brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive difficulty.

Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS): A brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive difficulty.

Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS): A brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive difficulty.

Background: Existing metrics of patient-reported cognitive difficulties in multiple sclerosis (MS) are lengthy, lack psychometric rigor, and/or fail to query prevalent expressive language deficits.

Objective: Develop a brief psychometrically robust metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits that includes language items; the Multiple Sclerosis Cognitive Scale (MSCS).

Method: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on 20 Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) items plus five newly developed language questions in a large MS sample and matched respondents without neurologic disease. Independent confirmatory principal components analysis (PCA) assessed EFA factor structure. Reliability of the new scale and subscales, and relationships with objective cognitive impairment and cognitive change, were assessed.

Results: EFA in patients (n = 502) and controls (n = 350), item analyses, and confirmatory PCA in an independent sample (n = 361 patients; 150 controls) supported construction of an eight-item scale with four two-item subscales: Executive/Speed, Working Memory, Expressive Language, and Episodic Memory. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were excellent for the total MSCS (α = 0.93, ICC = 0.95) and good for each subscale (α's:0.83-0.87; ICCs: 0.86-0.92). MSCS showed medium-size links to cross-sectional objective cognitive impairment (η2 = .06) and cognitive change over time (η2 = .07); the traditional PDQ did not (η2s = 0.01 and 0.02).

Conclusion: The brief MSCS is a psychometrically robust, reliable, and valid metric of patient-reported cognitive deficits in MS that holds promise for improving assessment of MS cognitive dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信