{"title":"st段抬高型心肌梗死患者微血管功能障碍及微循环阻力指数的急中期评价。","authors":"Shojiro Hirano, Takayuki Yabe, Yosuke Oka, Hiroto Aikawa, Hideo Amano, Takanori Ikeda","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), despite exhibiting normal patency in the culprit arteries following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary microvessels do not recover adequately, leading to microvascular dysfunction (MVD). Limited data are available regarding microcirculation assessed through invasive measures during the midterm period. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of MVD in STEMI patients using the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) during the midterm period.We prospectively evaluated 41 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI. IMR was measured by placing a coronary pressure wire with intravenous adenosine at 1 week as the acute phase and at 6 months after primary PCI as the midterm period. An improvement in IMR was observed from baseline to follow-up, with values changing from 30.00 (15.00-45.50) to 19.00 (10.50-30.50) (P = 0.020). The degree of MVD significantly decreased during follow-up (from 61.0% to 34.1%, McNemar's test: P = 0.016). Compared to patients with normal microcirculation, those with MVD (IMR > 25) at midterm follow-up exhibited significantly elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide (180.25 [68.25-370.65] pg/mL versus 75.90 [18.70-169.70] pg/mL, P = 0.043) and prolonged symptom-onset-to-balloon time (727.00 [213.50-1170.00] minutes versus 186.00 [125.00-316.00] minutes, P = 0.002).These findings indicate that the extent of MVD 6 months post-PCI has significantly diminished compared to discharge levels and is associated with symptom-onset-to-balloon time. Therefore, MVD in patients with STEMI can potentially improve in the midterm under specific circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute and Mid-Term Assessment of Microvascular Dysfunction with Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Shojiro Hirano, Takayuki Yabe, Yosuke Oka, Hiroto Aikawa, Hideo Amano, Takanori Ikeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/ihj.24-447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), despite exhibiting normal patency in the culprit arteries following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary microvessels do not recover adequately, leading to microvascular dysfunction (MVD). Limited data are available regarding microcirculation assessed through invasive measures during the midterm period. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of MVD in STEMI patients using the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) during the midterm period.We prospectively evaluated 41 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI. IMR was measured by placing a coronary pressure wire with intravenous adenosine at 1 week as the acute phase and at 6 months after primary PCI as the midterm period. An improvement in IMR was observed from baseline to follow-up, with values changing from 30.00 (15.00-45.50) to 19.00 (10.50-30.50) (P = 0.020). The degree of MVD significantly decreased during follow-up (from 61.0% to 34.1%, McNemar's test: P = 0.016). Compared to patients with normal microcirculation, those with MVD (IMR > 25) at midterm follow-up exhibited significantly elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide (180.25 [68.25-370.65] pg/mL versus 75.90 [18.70-169.70] pg/mL, P = 0.043) and prolonged symptom-onset-to-balloon time (727.00 [213.50-1170.00] minutes versus 186.00 [125.00-316.00] minutes, P = 0.002).These findings indicate that the extent of MVD 6 months post-PCI has significantly diminished compared to discharge levels and is associated with symptom-onset-to-balloon time. Therefore, MVD in patients with STEMI can potentially improve in the midterm under specific circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International heart journal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-447\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在诊断为st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的患者中,尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后罪魁动脉通畅正常,但冠状动脉微血管不能充分恢复,导致微血管功能障碍(MVD)。中期通过侵入性措施评估的微循环数据有限。本研究旨在探讨STEMI患者中期微血管阻力指数(IMR)对MVD的评价。我们前瞻性评估了41例接受PCI治疗的STEMI患者。在急性期1周和初次PCI后6个月,通过放置冠脉压丝静脉滴注腺苷来测量IMR。从基线到随访观察到IMR的改善,其值从30.00(15.00-45.50)变化到19.00 (10.50-30.50)(P = 0.020)。随访期间MVD程度明显降低(由61.0%降至34.1%,McNemar检验:P = 0.016)。与微循环正常的患者相比,中期随访时MVD (IMR为bbb25)患者的脑钠肽水平显著升高(180.25 [68.25-370.65]pg/mL vs 75.90 [18.70-169.70] pg/mL, P = 0.043),症状发作至球囊时间延长(727.00[213.50-1170.00]分钟vs 186.00[125.00-316.00]分钟,P = 0.002)。这些发现表明,与出院水平相比,pci术后6个月MVD的范围明显减小,并且与症状发作到球囊时间有关。因此,在特定情况下,STEMI患者的MVD有可能在中期得到改善。
Acute and Mid-Term Assessment of Microvascular Dysfunction with Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.
In patients diagnosed with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), despite exhibiting normal patency in the culprit arteries following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary microvessels do not recover adequately, leading to microvascular dysfunction (MVD). Limited data are available regarding microcirculation assessed through invasive measures during the midterm period. This study aimed to investigate the assessment of MVD in STEMI patients using the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) during the midterm period.We prospectively evaluated 41 patients with STEMI who underwent PCI. IMR was measured by placing a coronary pressure wire with intravenous adenosine at 1 week as the acute phase and at 6 months after primary PCI as the midterm period. An improvement in IMR was observed from baseline to follow-up, with values changing from 30.00 (15.00-45.50) to 19.00 (10.50-30.50) (P = 0.020). The degree of MVD significantly decreased during follow-up (from 61.0% to 34.1%, McNemar's test: P = 0.016). Compared to patients with normal microcirculation, those with MVD (IMR > 25) at midterm follow-up exhibited significantly elevated levels of brain natriuretic peptide (180.25 [68.25-370.65] pg/mL versus 75.90 [18.70-169.70] pg/mL, P = 0.043) and prolonged symptom-onset-to-balloon time (727.00 [213.50-1170.00] minutes versus 186.00 [125.00-316.00] minutes, P = 0.002).These findings indicate that the extent of MVD 6 months post-PCI has significantly diminished compared to discharge levels and is associated with symptom-onset-to-balloon time. Therefore, MVD in patients with STEMI can potentially improve in the midterm under specific circumstances.
期刊介绍:
Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.