国际癌症研究机构致癌物的关键特征研讨会:评估致癌物危害机理证据的终点的评估。

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1289/EHP15389
David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia
{"title":"国际癌症研究机构致癌物的关键特征研讨会:评估致癌物危害机理证据的终点的评估。","authors":"David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia","doi":"10.1289/EHP15389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The <i>International Agency for Research on Cancer</i> (<i>IARC</i>) <i>Monographs</i> programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future <i>IARC Monographs</i> evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the <i>IARC Monographs</i> experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: <i>a</i>) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, <i>b</i>) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and <i>c</i>) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of <i>in silico</i>, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the <i>IARC Monographs</i> or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 2","pages":"25001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards.\",\"authors\":\"David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia\",\"doi\":\"10.1289/EHP15389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The <i>International Agency for Research on Cancer</i> (<i>IARC</i>) <i>Monographs</i> programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future <i>IARC Monographs</i> evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the <i>IARC Monographs</i> experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: <i>a</i>) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, <i>b</i>) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and <i>c</i>) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of <i>in silico</i>, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the <i>IARC Monographs</i> or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"133 2\",\"pages\":\"25001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790013/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:致癌物的10个关键特征(KCs)构成了一个框架的基础,用于识别、组织和评估与致癌物危害识别相关的机制证据。这10个KCs与致癌物致癌的机制有关。国际癌症研究机构(IARC)专著计划成功地应用了KCs框架,对不同类型的暴露进行了机制评估,包括化学品、金属和复杂的暴露,如环境、职业或饮食暴露。该框架的使用大大增强了相关机制数据的识别和组织,最大限度地减少了评估中的偏差,并丰富了关于已知和疑似致癌物机制的知识库。目的:我们试图报告由IARC召集的IARC科学研讨会的主要结果,该研讨会旨在建立在未来IARC专著评估中适当、透明和统一的KCs应用。方法:一组来自不同学科的专家回顾了IARC专著在致癌物质KCs方面的经验,讨论了三个主要主题:A)形成KCs证据基础的终点的解释,b)对KCs的新分析数据的整合,以及c)将机制证据整合为癌症危害识别的一部分。研讨会参与者评估了多个kcs相关终点的相关性和信息量,以评估暴露于人类和实验系统的研究中的机制证据。讨论:就如何加强硅、分子和细胞高输出和高通量数据的使用达成共识。此外,还探讨了整合主要癌症中心证据的方法,以及改进癌症危害机制评估方法的机会。本文和即将发布的国际癌症研究机构技术报告中所描述的发现将支持未来的专家工作组在国际癌症研究机构各专论或其他情况下,根据KCs框架报告和解释结果。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards.

Background: The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.

Objectives: We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future IARC Monographs evaluations.

Methods: A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the IARC Monographs experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: a) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, b) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and c) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.

Discussion: Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of in silico, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the IARC Monographs or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信