确定燧石文物上邻近疤痕的相对年代的可靠性和有效性

IF 2.6 1区地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY

Journal of Archaeological Science Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2025.106156

Małgorzata Kot , Jerzy Tyszkiewicz , Michał Leloch , Natalia Gryczewska , Sebastian Miller

{"title":"确定燧石文物上邻近疤痕的相对年代的可靠性和有效性","authors":"Małgorzata Kot , Jerzy Tyszkiewicz , Michał Leloch , Natalia Gryczewska , Sebastian Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to experimentally test the credibility of the diacritic analysis, which is one of the methods used to study lithic knapping technology. A series of blind tests conducted by lithic experts and students on experimentally knapped artefacts were used to estimate the reliability and validity of the method. The estimated average error rate was 21%, although it was smaller among the experts in the method (15%) and higher (25%) for the beginners. Further analyses indicated that the errors were not made randomly but concentrated in challenging spots. We additionally tested several factors that might influence the difficulty of identifying the scar chronology and, therefore, suggested a set of actions that can prevent errors when determining the relative chronology of scars on lithic artefacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 106156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity in determining the relative chronology between neighbouring scars on flint artefacts\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Kot , Jerzy Tyszkiewicz , Michał Leloch , Natalia Gryczewska , Sebastian Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We aimed to experimentally test the credibility of the diacritic analysis, which is one of the methods used to study lithic knapping technology. A series of blind tests conducted by lithic experts and students on experimentally knapped artefacts were used to estimate the reliability and validity of the method. The estimated average error rate was 21%, although it was smaller among the experts in the method (15%) and higher (25%) for the beginners. Further analyses indicated that the errors were not made randomly but concentrated in challenging spots. We additionally tested several factors that might influence the difficulty of identifying the scar chronology and, therefore, suggested a set of actions that can prevent errors when determining the relative chronology of scars on lithic artefacts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"175 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325000056\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325000056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是通过实验来检验变音符分析的可信度，这是研究岩屑敲击技术的方法之一。由岩屑专家和学生对实验捕获的文物进行了一系列盲测，以评估该方法的信度和效度。估计的平均错误率为21%，尽管专家的错误率较小（15%），初学者的错误率较高（25%）。进一步的分析表明，这些错误不是随机产生的，而是集中在具有挑战性的地方。我们还测试了几个可能影响识别疤痕年代的因素，因此，我们提出了一套措施，可以防止在确定石器文物上疤痕的相对年代时出现错误。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reliability and validity in determining the relative chronology between neighbouring scars on flint artefacts

We aimed to experimentally test the credibility of the diacritic analysis, which is one of the methods used to study lithic knapping technology. A series of blind tests conducted by lithic experts and students on experimentally knapped artefacts were used to estimate the reliability and validity of the method. The estimated average error rate was 21%, although it was smaller among the experts in the method (15%) and higher (25%) for the beginners. Further analyses indicated that the errors were not made randomly but concentrated in challenging spots. We additionally tested several factors that might influence the difficulty of identifying the scar chronology and, therefore, suggested a set of actions that can prevent errors when determining the relative chronology of scars on lithic artefacts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

7.10%

发文量

112

审稿时长

49 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.