医疗保险中孤独、社会孤立的成年人的医患沟通。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sungchul Park PhD , Ann M. Nguyen PhD , Zoe Lindenfeld PhD , Ji Eun Chang PhD
{"title":"医疗保险中孤独、社会孤立的成年人的医患沟通。","authors":"Sungchul Park PhD ,&nbsp;Ann M. Nguyen PhD ,&nbsp;Zoe Lindenfeld PhD ,&nbsp;Ji Eun Chang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older adults experiencing loneliness or social isolation may experience poor patient–provider communication, potentially contributing to suboptimal healthcare utilization, particularly in mental healthcare. However, empirical evidence is limited. Thus, this study examined whether there were differences in patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes were patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization. The primary independent variables were loneliness and social isolation. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted differences in outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation. The analysis was conducted in September 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 4,433 Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness were 4.0 percentage points (95% CI=1.0, 7.1) more likely to report poor patient–provider communication compared to those without loneliness. Similarly, those with social isolation were 2.0 percentage points (1.1, 2.9) more likely to report poor communication than those without social isolation. The rates of mental healthcare utilization were higher among those with loneliness (1.8 [1.0, 2.6], 1.5 [0.8, 2.2], and 3.1 [1.1, 5.1] for social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) or social isolation (2.3 [0.6, 4.0] for psychiatrists), but the overall level of mental healthcare utilization remained relatively low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight significant disparities in patient–provider communication among Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness and social isolation. These disparities may partly result from limited engagement with mental health services, which could help address their specific healthcare needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"68 5","pages":"Pages 905-913"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient–Provider Communication for Lonely, Socially Isolated Adults in Medicare\",\"authors\":\"Sungchul Park PhD ,&nbsp;Ann M. Nguyen PhD ,&nbsp;Zoe Lindenfeld PhD ,&nbsp;Ji Eun Chang PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Older adults experiencing loneliness or social isolation may experience poor patient–provider communication, potentially contributing to suboptimal healthcare utilization, particularly in mental healthcare. However, empirical evidence is limited. Thus, this study examined whether there were differences in patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes were patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization. The primary independent variables were loneliness and social isolation. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted differences in outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation. The analysis was conducted in September 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample included 4,433 Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness were 4.0 percentage points (95% CI=1.0, 7.1) more likely to report poor patient–provider communication compared to those without loneliness. Similarly, those with social isolation were 2.0 percentage points (1.1, 2.9) more likely to report poor communication than those without social isolation. The rates of mental healthcare utilization were higher among those with loneliness (1.8 [1.0, 2.6], 1.5 [0.8, 2.2], and 3.1 [1.1, 5.1] for social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) or social isolation (2.3 [0.6, 4.0] for psychiatrists), but the overall level of mental healthcare utilization remained relatively low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight significant disparities in patient–provider communication among Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness and social isolation. These disparities may partly result from limited engagement with mental health services, which could help address their specific healthcare needs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 905-913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725000327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725000327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:经历孤独或社会孤立的老年人可能会经历不良的医患沟通,这可能导致医疗保健利用率低于最佳水平,特别是在精神卫生保健方面。然而,经验证据有限。因此,本研究考察了有无孤独和社会隔离的医疗保险受益人之间的患者-提供者沟通和医疗保健利用是否存在差异。方法:本研究使用2021年医疗支出小组调查的数据进行了横断面研究。结果是患者-提供者沟通和卫生保健利用。主要的自变量是孤独和社会隔离。进行回归分析以估计有和没有孤独和社会隔离的医疗保险受益人之间结果的调整差异。该分析是在2024年9月进行的。结果:样本包括4433名医疗保险受益人。与没有孤独感的人相比,经历孤独感的医疗保险受益人报告患者与提供者沟通不良的可能性要高4.0个百分点(95% CI: 1.0-7.1)。同样,那些与社会隔离的人比那些没有社会隔离的人报告沟通不良的可能性高出2.0个百分点(1.1-2.9)。孤独感(社会工作者、心理学家和精神科医生分别为1.8[1.0-2.6]、1.5[0.8-2.2]和3.1[1.1-5.1])或社会孤立(精神科医生为2.3[0.6,4.0])的精神卫生保健使用率较高,但总体水平仍相对较低。结论:这些发现突出了在经历孤独和社会隔离的医疗保险受益人中患者与提供者沟通的显著差异。这些差异在一定程度上可能是由于对精神卫生服务的参与有限,而精神卫生服务可以帮助解决他们的具体卫生保健需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient–Provider Communication for Lonely, Socially Isolated Adults in Medicare

Introduction

Older adults experiencing loneliness or social isolation may experience poor patient–provider communication, potentially contributing to suboptimal healthcare utilization, particularly in mental healthcare. However, empirical evidence is limited. Thus, this study examined whether there were differences in patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation.

Methods

This study conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes were patient–provider communication and healthcare utilization. The primary independent variables were loneliness and social isolation. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted differences in outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation. The analysis was conducted in September 2024.

Results

The sample included 4,433 Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness were 4.0 percentage points (95% CI=1.0, 7.1) more likely to report poor patient–provider communication compared to those without loneliness. Similarly, those with social isolation were 2.0 percentage points (1.1, 2.9) more likely to report poor communication than those without social isolation. The rates of mental healthcare utilization were higher among those with loneliness (1.8 [1.0, 2.6], 1.5 [0.8, 2.2], and 3.1 [1.1, 5.1] for social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) or social isolation (2.3 [0.6, 4.0] for psychiatrists), but the overall level of mental healthcare utilization remained relatively low.

Conclusions

These findings highlight significant disparities in patient–provider communication among Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness and social isolation. These disparities may partly result from limited engagement with mental health services, which could help address their specific healthcare needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信