大流行防备:分析美洲区域呼吸道病原体大流行的国家计划。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Andrea Patricia Villalobos Rodríguez, Iyanna Wellington Perkins, Shoa Moosavi, Ana de la Garza, Ángel Rodríguez, Britney McMurren, Juliana Almeida Leite, Jairo Méndez-Rico, Lidia Redondo-Bravo, Miriam Esther Blanco Reyes, Olaya Astudillo, Paula Couto, Priscila S Born, Sarah Hess, Shoshanna Goldin, Hannah Lewis, Tamara Mancero, Andrea S Vicari, Marc Rondy
{"title":"大流行防备:分析美洲区域呼吸道病原体大流行的国家计划。","authors":"Andrea Patricia Villalobos Rodríguez, Iyanna Wellington Perkins, Shoa Moosavi, Ana de la Garza, Ángel Rodríguez, Britney McMurren, Juliana Almeida Leite, Jairo Méndez-Rico, Lidia Redondo-Bravo, Miriam Esther Blanco Reyes, Olaya Astudillo, Paula Couto, Priscila S Born, Sarah Hess, Shoshanna Goldin, Hannah Lewis, Tamara Mancero, Andrea S Vicari, Marc Rondy","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To identify gaps and define priority actions to strengthen national pandemic preparedness and response plans, we assessed the concordance between national plans for respiratory pathogens against the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic checklist and the States Parties Annual Report (SPAR) in the Americas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, semiquantitative study, we reviewed the most recent respiratory pandemic plans for 35 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) member states and assessed their concordance with (1) actionable guidelines in WHO pandemic checklist and (2) International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) core capacities using the latest SPAR tool. We developed 25 tracking questions to identify gaps, strengths, and opportunities for improvement using a 5-point scale. We compared the average SPAR score and the Pandemic Plans score to assess areas of convergence and variance between preparedness and capacities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 35 respiratory pandemic plans (2005-2024): 29 were influenza specific, 5 were COVID-19 specific, and 1 was not pathogen specific. Most national plans showed limited alignment with the content recommended in the pandemic checklist. The lowest concordance between plans and checklist was in public health and social measures (80% of plans with score of 1); emergency, logistics and supply chain management (74%); and research and development (71%). Conversely, the strongest subcomponents were policy, legal, and normative instruments (45% of plans with score 4 or 5); coordination (46%); and surveillance: early detection and assessment (43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is recommended that countries build on the strengths of their national pandemic preparedness and response plans and update them using PRET module 1. This will support countries advance the capacities required by the IHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"S90-S99"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic Preparedness: Analyzing National Plans for Respiratory Pathogen Pandemics in the Americas Region.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Patricia Villalobos Rodríguez, Iyanna Wellington Perkins, Shoa Moosavi, Ana de la Garza, Ángel Rodríguez, Britney McMurren, Juliana Almeida Leite, Jairo Méndez-Rico, Lidia Redondo-Bravo, Miriam Esther Blanco Reyes, Olaya Astudillo, Paula Couto, Priscila S Born, Sarah Hess, Shoshanna Goldin, Hannah Lewis, Tamara Mancero, Andrea S Vicari, Marc Rondy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To identify gaps and define priority actions to strengthen national pandemic preparedness and response plans, we assessed the concordance between national plans for respiratory pathogens against the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic checklist and the States Parties Annual Report (SPAR) in the Americas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, semiquantitative study, we reviewed the most recent respiratory pandemic plans for 35 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) member states and assessed their concordance with (1) actionable guidelines in WHO pandemic checklist and (2) International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) core capacities using the latest SPAR tool. We developed 25 tracking questions to identify gaps, strengths, and opportunities for improvement using a 5-point scale. We compared the average SPAR score and the Pandemic Plans score to assess areas of convergence and variance between preparedness and capacities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 35 respiratory pandemic plans (2005-2024): 29 were influenza specific, 5 were COVID-19 specific, and 1 was not pathogen specific. Most national plans showed limited alignment with the content recommended in the pandemic checklist. The lowest concordance between plans and checklist was in public health and social measures (80% of plans with score of 1); emergency, logistics and supply chain management (74%); and research and development (71%). Conversely, the strongest subcomponents were policy, legal, and normative instruments (45% of plans with score 4 or 5); coordination (46%); and surveillance: early detection and assessment (43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is recommended that countries build on the strengths of their national pandemic preparedness and response plans and update them using PRET module 1. This will support countries advance the capacities required by the IHR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"S90-S99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:《国际卫生条例(2005)》要求缔约国发展发现、评估和应对公共卫生威胁的能力,并通过《缔约国年度报告》向世界卫生大会报告。国家大流行病防范和应对计划(PPRP)有助于提高国家能力,但这两种工具之间存在一些差异。为了确定差距并确定加强大流行计划的优先行动,我们根据2023年发布的大流行清单和SPAR评估了国家大流行防范和应对呼吸道病原体计划之间的一致性。方法:在这项于2024年8月进行的回顾性半定量研究中,我们审查了35个泛美卫生组织成员国最近的呼吸道大流行计划,并使用最新的SPAR工具评估了它们与(1)世界卫生组织大流行清单中的可操作指南和(2)《国际卫生条例(2005)》核心能力的一致性。我们制定了25个跟踪问题,以确定大流行计划中的差距、优势和改进机会,使用基于世卫组织新出现威胁的准备和复原力(PRET)模块1中描述的能力和能力建立的大流行核对表。我们使用了五分制(从1分,即未提及子成分,到5分,即在所有级别都描述了子成分),并计算了每个成分的平均大流行计划得分(PP得分)。对2005-2024年大流行计划的数据进行了汇编、选择、分析和评分。我们比较了SPAR平均得分和PP得分,以评估准备和能力之间的趋同和差异领域。使用R和Excel进行分析。结果:我们分析了35个呼吸道大流行计划:29个是流感特异性的,5个是covid -19特异性的,1个是非病原体特异性的。大多数目前的国家计划与预防病毒小组大流行核对表中建议的内容一致程度有限。在区域一级,计划与大流行核对表之间的一致性最低的是以下子组成部分公共卫生和社会措施(80%的计划得分为1分);应急、物流和供应链管理(74%);研究与开发(71%)。相反,最强的子组件(≥40%的计划,得分为4或5)是:政策,法律和规范工具(45%);协调(46%);监测:早期发现和评估(43%)。在大多数国家,SPAR得分倾向于高于PP得分,除了阿根廷(最新审查的计划),其模式相反,PP得分超过SPAR得分。结论:鉴于目前的计划与预防措施模块1倡议所支持的全球标准之间存在差距,建议各国利用其国家大流行病防范和应对计划的优势,并使用预防措施模块1对其进行更新。这将支持各国提高《国际卫生条例》所要求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandemic Preparedness: Analyzing National Plans for Respiratory Pathogen Pandemics in the Americas Region.

Background: To identify gaps and define priority actions to strengthen national pandemic preparedness and response plans, we assessed the concordance between national plans for respiratory pathogens against the World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic checklist and the States Parties Annual Report (SPAR) in the Americas.

Methods: In this retrospective, semiquantitative study, we reviewed the most recent respiratory pandemic plans for 35 Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) member states and assessed their concordance with (1) actionable guidelines in WHO pandemic checklist and (2) International Health Regulations (IHR) (2005) core capacities using the latest SPAR tool. We developed 25 tracking questions to identify gaps, strengths, and opportunities for improvement using a 5-point scale. We compared the average SPAR score and the Pandemic Plans score to assess areas of convergence and variance between preparedness and capacities.

Results: We analyzed 35 respiratory pandemic plans (2005-2024): 29 were influenza specific, 5 were COVID-19 specific, and 1 was not pathogen specific. Most national plans showed limited alignment with the content recommended in the pandemic checklist. The lowest concordance between plans and checklist was in public health and social measures (80% of plans with score of 1); emergency, logistics and supply chain management (74%); and research and development (71%). Conversely, the strongest subcomponents were policy, legal, and normative instruments (45% of plans with score 4 or 5); coordination (46%); and surveillance: early detection and assessment (43%).

Conclusions: It is recommended that countries build on the strengths of their national pandemic preparedness and response plans and update them using PRET module 1. This will support countries advance the capacities required by the IHR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infectious Diseases
Journal of Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
449
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信