什么时候是居民的“方便时间”?:试用住院医师学习日志作为住院医师异步学习工具。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2461579
Tadayuki Hashimoto, Shoko Ariyoshi, Taira Ariyoshi, Ryosuke Horitani, Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda, Kanapa Kornsawad, Shunsuke Kosugi, Makoto Kikukawa, Tomio Suzuki
{"title":"什么时候是居民的“方便时间”?:试用住院医师学习日志作为住院医师异步学习工具。","authors":"Tadayuki Hashimoto, Shoko Ariyoshi, Taira Ariyoshi, Ryosuke Horitani, Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda, Kanapa Kornsawad, Shunsuke Kosugi, Makoto Kikukawa, Tomio Suzuki","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2461579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of online learning in health professions education has grown rapidly, offering flexibility to learners worldwide. Asynchronous online learning allows residents to engage with educational content at a time convenient for them, accommodating their demanding schedules. This study aims to reveal how residents approach asynchronous online learning during their residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Resident Study Log, an asynchronous learning tool, was introduced in a teaching hospital in Japan. This tool facilitated residents to share daily reflections on their learning experiences, allowing supervising physicians outside of their regular clinical teams to provide feedback. Posts shared between April 2020 and July 2021 were reviewed. The outcome measured included the frequency and timing of posts as well as residents' satisfaction and perceived burden, which were assessed through anonymous surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 residents participated during the study period, posting 599 entries on the Resident Study Log, averaging one post per resident every two days. Participants reported an average satisfaction score of 5.3 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not satisfied at all' and 6 indicated 'very satisfied'), while the perceived burden averaged 4.0 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not burdensome at all' and 6 indicated 'very burdensome'). Notably, posting activity peaked at around 23:00, with 17.4% of posts created between midnight and 5:00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Resident Study Log was a simple, low-cost tool, with high satisfaction levels among residents. However, the late-night posting pattern raises concerns about resident well-being and sleep hygiene. As asynchronous learning is increasingly more prevalent, it is crucial to ensure it does not inadvertently impose hidden burdens on learners' overall well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2461579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When is \\\"convenient time\\\" for residents?: a trial of Resident Study Log as asynchronous learning tool for residents.\",\"authors\":\"Tadayuki Hashimoto, Shoko Ariyoshi, Taira Ariyoshi, Ryosuke Horitani, Mohammad Adrian Hasdianda, Kanapa Kornsawad, Shunsuke Kosugi, Makoto Kikukawa, Tomio Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10872981.2025.2461579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of online learning in health professions education has grown rapidly, offering flexibility to learners worldwide. Asynchronous online learning allows residents to engage with educational content at a time convenient for them, accommodating their demanding schedules. This study aims to reveal how residents approach asynchronous online learning during their residency training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Resident Study Log, an asynchronous learning tool, was introduced in a teaching hospital in Japan. This tool facilitated residents to share daily reflections on their learning experiences, allowing supervising physicians outside of their regular clinical teams to provide feedback. Posts shared between April 2020 and July 2021 were reviewed. The outcome measured included the frequency and timing of posts as well as residents' satisfaction and perceived burden, which were assessed through anonymous surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 residents participated during the study period, posting 599 entries on the Resident Study Log, averaging one post per resident every two days. Participants reported an average satisfaction score of 5.3 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not satisfied at all' and 6 indicated 'very satisfied'), while the perceived burden averaged 4.0 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not burdensome at all' and 6 indicated 'very burdensome'). Notably, posting activity peaked at around 23:00, with 17.4% of posts created between midnight and 5:00.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Resident Study Log was a simple, low-cost tool, with high satisfaction levels among residents. However, the late-night posting pattern raises concerns about resident well-being and sleep hygiene. As asynchronous learning is increasingly more prevalent, it is crucial to ensure it does not inadvertently impose hidden burdens on learners' overall well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"2461579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789214/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2461579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2461579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线学习在卫生专业教育中的整合发展迅速,为全球学习者提供了灵活性。异步在线学习允许居民在方便的时间参与教育内容,以适应他们苛刻的时间表。本研究旨在揭示住院医师在住院医师培训期间如何进行异步在线学习。方法:在日本某教学医院采用异步学习工具“住院医师学习日志”。这个工具方便住院医生分享他们的日常学习经验,允许他们常规临床团队之外的监督医生提供反馈。对2020年4月至2021年7月期间分享的帖子进行了审查。测量的结果包括发帖的频率和时间,以及居民的满意度和感知负担,这些都是通过匿名调查来评估的。结果:共有31位居民参与了研究期间,在居民研究日志上发表了599篇文章,平均每两天发表一篇文章。参与者报告的平均满意度得分为5.3分,满分为6.0分(6分李克特量表,1分表示“完全不满意”,6分表示“非常满意”),而感知负担的平均得分为4.0分,满分为6.0分(6分李克特量表,1分表示“完全不负担”,6分表示“非常负担”)。值得注意的是,发布活动在23:00左右达到顶峰,17.4%的帖子是在午夜到5:00之间创建的。结论:居民学习日志是一种简单、低成本的工具,居民满意度高。然而,这种深夜发帖的模式引发了人们对居民健康和睡眠卫生的担忧。随着异步学习越来越普遍,确保它不会无意中给学习者的整体福祉带来隐性负担至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

When is "convenient time" for residents?: a trial of Resident Study Log as asynchronous learning tool for residents.

When is "convenient time" for residents?: a trial of Resident Study Log as asynchronous learning tool for residents.

Introduction: The integration of online learning in health professions education has grown rapidly, offering flexibility to learners worldwide. Asynchronous online learning allows residents to engage with educational content at a time convenient for them, accommodating their demanding schedules. This study aims to reveal how residents approach asynchronous online learning during their residency training.

Methods: The Resident Study Log, an asynchronous learning tool, was introduced in a teaching hospital in Japan. This tool facilitated residents to share daily reflections on their learning experiences, allowing supervising physicians outside of their regular clinical teams to provide feedback. Posts shared between April 2020 and July 2021 were reviewed. The outcome measured included the frequency and timing of posts as well as residents' satisfaction and perceived burden, which were assessed through anonymous surveys.

Results: A total of 31 residents participated during the study period, posting 599 entries on the Resident Study Log, averaging one post per resident every two days. Participants reported an average satisfaction score of 5.3 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not satisfied at all' and 6 indicated 'very satisfied'), while the perceived burden averaged 4.0 out of 6.0 (6-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated 'not burdensome at all' and 6 indicated 'very burdensome'). Notably, posting activity peaked at around 23:00, with 17.4% of posts created between midnight and 5:00.

Conclusion: The Resident Study Log was a simple, low-cost tool, with high satisfaction levels among residents. However, the late-night posting pattern raises concerns about resident well-being and sleep hygiene. As asynchronous learning is increasingly more prevalent, it is crucial to ensure it does not inadvertently impose hidden burdens on learners' overall well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信