调整-数字化作为转型过程和数字化逻辑和瑞典多样化初级保健逻辑之间的相互作用。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Karl Maack, Nanna Gillberg, Ewa Wikström
{"title":"调整-数字化作为转型过程和数字化逻辑和瑞典多样化初级保健逻辑之间的相互作用。","authors":"Karl Maack, Nanna Gillberg, Ewa Wikström","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to contribute with knowledge on the characteristics of the process of co-existence of value conflicts between managers, markets/businesses, patients, professionals and digital technology in primary care practices, to be able to nuance the array of descriptions of the consequences of introducing a digitalised care practice, such as telemedicine, into an already existing primary care organisation. Due to its organisational structure and dynamic environment with a multitude of professions and patients as well as influenced by managerial and market drivers, the primary care setting provides fertile ground for studying value conflicts from an institutional logic perspective.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This multi-source study utilises qualitative thematic content analysis on empirical data collected through interviews, a survey and documents, followed by an iterative analysis in regard to institutional logics based on the themes developed from empirical data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Coexistence and Adaptation: Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other. Digital Technology's Influence: Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic. Changing Healthcare Conditions: New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics. Patient Empowerment and Data Ownership: Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Medical Devices Regulation (MDR).</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>With its qualitative design there is not an emphasis on generalisability. The study is performed in a Swedish primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Regarding its practical implications, this study examines digitalisation and the introduction of eHealth solutions in primary care in Sweden. The adjustmentalisation of diverse institutional logics described in this study was used to try to facilitate the implementation of eHealth and telemedicine in primary care. This practical contribution could be used in other primary care organisation that plans to introduce eHealth solutions as part of their practices. This study may also have practical implications for other healthcare organisations since the presence of diverse institutional logics is not unique to primary care.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Firstly, this study confirms earlier studies that argue that co-existence of diverse logics is possible in everyday practice. However, we show that adjustmentalisation of the diverse logics rather than the balance of strengths between them, facilitates the transformation, regulation and coordination of the new eHealth practice in relation to established practices. Secondly, this study shows that the adjustmentalisation derives from societal challenges such as an ageing population, accessibility problems and the COVID pandemic that are used to legitimise the adjustmentalisation of diverse logics. Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong><i>Coexistence and adaptation:</i> Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other.<i>Digital technology's influence:</i> Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.<i>Changing healthcare conditions:</i> New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics.<i>Patient empowerment and data ownership:</i> Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like GDPR and MDR.<i>Future research directions:</i> Need for further research on digital technology's impact on shift and balance between logics, business development, patient participation and its potential to become a dominant logic.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjustmentalisation - digitalisation as transformation process and the interplay between a digital logic and diverse primary care logics in Sweden.\",\"authors\":\"Karl Maack, Nanna Gillberg, Ewa Wikström\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to contribute with knowledge on the characteristics of the process of co-existence of value conflicts between managers, markets/businesses, patients, professionals and digital technology in primary care practices, to be able to nuance the array of descriptions of the consequences of introducing a digitalised care practice, such as telemedicine, into an already existing primary care organisation. Due to its organisational structure and dynamic environment with a multitude of professions and patients as well as influenced by managerial and market drivers, the primary care setting provides fertile ground for studying value conflicts from an institutional logic perspective.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This multi-source study utilises qualitative thematic content analysis on empirical data collected through interviews, a survey and documents, followed by an iterative analysis in regard to institutional logics based on the themes developed from empirical data.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Coexistence and Adaptation: Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other. Digital Technology's Influence: Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic. Changing Healthcare Conditions: New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics. Patient Empowerment and Data Ownership: Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Medical Devices Regulation (MDR).</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>With its qualitative design there is not an emphasis on generalisability. The study is performed in a Swedish primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Regarding its practical implications, this study examines digitalisation and the introduction of eHealth solutions in primary care in Sweden. The adjustmentalisation of diverse institutional logics described in this study was used to try to facilitate the implementation of eHealth and telemedicine in primary care. This practical contribution could be used in other primary care organisation that plans to introduce eHealth solutions as part of their practices. This study may also have practical implications for other healthcare organisations since the presence of diverse institutional logics is not unique to primary care.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Firstly, this study confirms earlier studies that argue that co-existence of diverse logics is possible in everyday practice. However, we show that adjustmentalisation of the diverse logics rather than the balance of strengths between them, facilitates the transformation, regulation and coordination of the new eHealth practice in relation to established practices. Secondly, this study shows that the adjustmentalisation derives from societal challenges such as an ageing population, accessibility problems and the COVID pandemic that are used to legitimise the adjustmentalisation of diverse logics. Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong><i>Coexistence and adaptation:</i> Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other.<i>Digital technology's influence:</i> Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.<i>Changing healthcare conditions:</i> New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics.<i>Patient empowerment and data ownership:</i> Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like GDPR and MDR.<i>Future research directions:</i> Need for further research on digital technology's impact on shift and balance between logics, business development, patient participation and its potential to become a dominant logic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-07-2024-0281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在为初级保健实践中管理者、市场/企业、患者、专业人员和数字技术之间共存的价值冲突过程的特征做出贡献,以便能够细微差别地描述将数字化护理实践(如远程医疗)引入现有初级保健组织的后果。由于其组织结构和动态环境,以及众多的专业和患者,以及受管理和市场驱动因素的影响,初级保健环境为从制度逻辑角度研究价值冲突提供了肥沃的土壤。设计/方法/方法:这项多来源研究对通过访谈、调查和文件收集的经验数据进行定性主题内容分析,然后根据从经验数据中开发的主题对制度逻辑进行迭代分析。发现:共存与适应:不同的逻辑并非相互竞争或支配,而是通过调整而共存和转化。数字技术的影响:数字技术影响并与所有已建立的逻辑相互作用,潜在地作为一个独立的,不断发展的逻辑。不断变化的医疗保健条件:医疗保健中的新条件和数字解决方案可能会改变逻辑的平衡,可能会使管理和市场逻辑正常化。患者授权和数据所有权:根据《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)和《医疗器械条例》(MDR)等法规,越来越重视患者授权和透明的数据处理。研究局限/启示:定性设计并没有强调通用性。该研究是在瑞典的初级保健机构进行的。实际意义:关于其实际意义,本研究考察了数字化和在瑞典初级保健中引入电子健康解决方案。本研究中描述的各种制度逻辑的调整被用来试图促进初级保健中电子卫生和远程医疗的实施。这一实际贡献可用于计划将电子保健解决方案作为其实践的一部分引入的其他初级保健组织。本研究也可能对其他医疗机构具有实际意义,因为不同制度逻辑的存在并非初级保健所独有。原创性/价值:首先,本研究证实了早期的研究认为,在日常实践中,多种逻辑的共存是可能的。然而,我们表明,不同逻辑的调整,而不是它们之间的优势平衡,促进了与既定实践相关的新电子卫生实践的转型、监管和协调。其次,本研究表明,调整源于人口老龄化、无障碍问题和COVID大流行等社会挑战,这些挑战被用来使各种逻辑的调整合法化。数字技术影响并与所有已建立的逻辑相互作用,潜在地作为一个独立的,不断发展的逻辑。主要发现:共存与适应:不同的逻辑不是相互竞争、相互支配,而是相互共存、相互转化。数字技术的影响:数字技术影响并与所有已建立的逻辑相互作用,潜在地作为一个独立的,不断发展的逻辑。不断变化的医疗保健条件:医疗保健中的新条件和数字解决方案可能会改变逻辑的平衡,可能会使管理和市场逻辑正常化。患者授权和数据所有权:根据GDPR和MDR等法规,越来越重视患者授权和透明的数据处理。未来研究方向:需要进一步研究数字技术对逻辑、业务发展、患者参与之间的转移和平衡的影响及其成为主导逻辑的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjustmentalisation - digitalisation as transformation process and the interplay between a digital logic and diverse primary care logics in Sweden.

Purpose: This study aims to contribute with knowledge on the characteristics of the process of co-existence of value conflicts between managers, markets/businesses, patients, professionals and digital technology in primary care practices, to be able to nuance the array of descriptions of the consequences of introducing a digitalised care practice, such as telemedicine, into an already existing primary care organisation. Due to its organisational structure and dynamic environment with a multitude of professions and patients as well as influenced by managerial and market drivers, the primary care setting provides fertile ground for studying value conflicts from an institutional logic perspective.

Design/methodology/approach: This multi-source study utilises qualitative thematic content analysis on empirical data collected through interviews, a survey and documents, followed by an iterative analysis in regard to institutional logics based on the themes developed from empirical data.

Findings: Coexistence and Adaptation: Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other. Digital Technology's Influence: Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic. Changing Healthcare Conditions: New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics. Patient Empowerment and Data Ownership: Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Medical Devices Regulation (MDR).

Research limitations/implications: With its qualitative design there is not an emphasis on generalisability. The study is performed in a Swedish primary care setting.

Practical implications: Regarding its practical implications, this study examines digitalisation and the introduction of eHealth solutions in primary care in Sweden. The adjustmentalisation of diverse institutional logics described in this study was used to try to facilitate the implementation of eHealth and telemedicine in primary care. This practical contribution could be used in other primary care organisation that plans to introduce eHealth solutions as part of their practices. This study may also have practical implications for other healthcare organisations since the presence of diverse institutional logics is not unique to primary care.

Originality/value: Firstly, this study confirms earlier studies that argue that co-existence of diverse logics is possible in everyday practice. However, we show that adjustmentalisation of the diverse logics rather than the balance of strengths between them, facilitates the transformation, regulation and coordination of the new eHealth practice in relation to established practices. Secondly, this study shows that the adjustmentalisation derives from societal challenges such as an ageing population, accessibility problems and the COVID pandemic that are used to legitimise the adjustmentalisation of diverse logics. Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.

Key findings: Coexistence and adaptation: Different logics coexist and transform through adjustmentalisation rather than competing or dominating each other.Digital technology's influence: Digital technology influences and interacts with all established logics, potentially acting as a separate, evolving logic.Changing healthcare conditions: New conditions and digital solutions in healthcare may shift the balance of logics, potentially normalising managerial and market logics.Patient empowerment and data ownership: Increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and transparent data processing under regulations like GDPR and MDR.Future research directions: Need for further research on digital technology's impact on shift and balance between logics, business development, patient participation and its potential to become a dominant logic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信