Giuseppe Consorti, Giulio Cirignaco, Gabriele Monarchi, Lisa Catarzi, Mariagrazia Paglianiti, Enrico Betti, Umberto Committeri, Lucrezia Togni, Marco Mascitti, Paolo Balercia, Andrea Santarelli
{"title":"专业口腔卫生在提高颌面外伤手术疗效中的作用。","authors":"Giuseppe Consorti, Giulio Cirignaco, Gabriele Monarchi, Lisa Catarzi, Mariagrazia Paglianiti, Enrico Betti, Umberto Committeri, Lucrezia Togni, Marco Mascitti, Paolo Balercia, Andrea Santarelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The oral cavity poses challenges in surgical interventions due to its microbial flora. Maxillofacial trauma surgeries are vulnerable to infections, complicating recovery. Traditional methods, including antibiotic prophylaxis, have limitations, highlighting the need for complementary strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of professional oral hygiene protocol on infection rates, mucosal health, and pain levels in maxillofacial trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 529 patients treated for maxillofacial trauma at the Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit of \"Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti\" in Ancona, Italy, from 2018 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Period 1 (2018-2020, no protocol) and Period 2 (2021-2023, protocol implemented). All patients were in good general health, with no systemic diseases compromising immunity or influencing surgical outcomes. The protocol included supragingival scaling 48 h preoperatively, chlorhexidine 0.20 % three times daily postoperatively, and standardized antibiotic and analgesic regimens. Data included infection rates, modified Beck Oral Assessment Scores and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and Chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Period 2 showed significantly lower infection rates (13.44 % vs. 19.48 %, p = 0.023), reduced pain scores (mean NRS: 4.6 vs. 5.4, p < 0.01) and improved mucosal health (mean BOAS: 2.91 vs. 3.75, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The professional oral hygiene protocol reduced postoperative complications, improved oral health, and enhanced patient comfort. These findings support the integration of structured oral hygiene measures into standard maxillofacial surgical care to optimize outcomes and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of professional oral hygiene in enhancing outcomes of maxillofacial trauma surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Consorti, Giulio Cirignaco, Gabriele Monarchi, Lisa Catarzi, Mariagrazia Paglianiti, Enrico Betti, Umberto Committeri, Lucrezia Togni, Marco Mascitti, Paolo Balercia, Andrea Santarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The oral cavity poses challenges in surgical interventions due to its microbial flora. Maxillofacial trauma surgeries are vulnerable to infections, complicating recovery. Traditional methods, including antibiotic prophylaxis, have limitations, highlighting the need for complementary strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the impact of professional oral hygiene protocol on infection rates, mucosal health, and pain levels in maxillofacial trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 529 patients treated for maxillofacial trauma at the Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit of \\\"Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti\\\" in Ancona, Italy, from 2018 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Period 1 (2018-2020, no protocol) and Period 2 (2021-2023, protocol implemented). All patients were in good general health, with no systemic diseases compromising immunity or influencing surgical outcomes. The protocol included supragingival scaling 48 h preoperatively, chlorhexidine 0.20 % three times daily postoperatively, and standardized antibiotic and analgesic regimens. Data included infection rates, modified Beck Oral Assessment Scores and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and Chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Period 2 showed significantly lower infection rates (13.44 % vs. 19.48 %, p = 0.023), reduced pain scores (mean NRS: 4.6 vs. 5.4, p < 0.01) and improved mucosal health (mean BOAS: 2.91 vs. 3.75, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The professional oral hygiene protocol reduced postoperative complications, improved oral health, and enhanced patient comfort. These findings support the integration of structured oral hygiene measures into standard maxillofacial surgical care to optimize outcomes and quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102269\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:口腔由于其微生物菌群对手术干预提出了挑战。颌面部创伤手术容易感染,使恢复复杂化。包括抗生素预防在内的传统方法具有局限性,因此需要补充策略。目的:本研究评估专业口腔卫生方案对颌面部创伤患者感染率、粘膜健康和疼痛水平的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析2018年至2023年在意大利安科纳“Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti”颌面外科治疗的529例颌面部创伤患者。患者分为两组:第一阶段(2018-2020年,无方案)和第二阶段(2021-2023年,实施方案)。所有患者总体健康状况良好,没有系统性疾病损害免疫力或影响手术结果。该方案包括术前48小时龈上刮治,术后每日三次使用0.20%氯己定,以及标准化的抗生素和镇痛方案。数据包括感染率、改良的贝克口腔评估评分和数值评定量表疼痛评分。统计学分析采用独立t检验和卡方检验,p < 0.05为显著性。结果:二期患者感染率明显降低(13.44% vs. 19.48%, p = 0.023),疼痛评分明显降低(平均NRS: 4.6 vs. 5.4, p < 0.01),粘膜健康状况明显改善(平均BOAS: 2.91 vs. 3.75, p < 0.001)。讨论:专业的口腔卫生方案减少了术后并发症,改善了口腔健康,提高了患者的舒适度。这些发现支持将结构化口腔卫生措施整合到标准颌面外科护理中,以优化结果和生活质量。
The role of professional oral hygiene in enhancing outcomes of maxillofacial trauma surgery.
Background: The oral cavity poses challenges in surgical interventions due to its microbial flora. Maxillofacial trauma surgeries are vulnerable to infections, complicating recovery. Traditional methods, including antibiotic prophylaxis, have limitations, highlighting the need for complementary strategies.
Objective: This study evaluated the impact of professional oral hygiene protocol on infection rates, mucosal health, and pain levels in maxillofacial trauma patients.
Material and methods: A retrospective study analyzed 529 patients treated for maxillofacial trauma at the Maxillo-Facial Surgery Unit of "Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti" in Ancona, Italy, from 2018 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: Period 1 (2018-2020, no protocol) and Period 2 (2021-2023, protocol implemented). All patients were in good general health, with no systemic diseases compromising immunity or influencing surgical outcomes. The protocol included supragingival scaling 48 h preoperatively, chlorhexidine 0.20 % three times daily postoperatively, and standardized antibiotic and analgesic regimens. Data included infection rates, modified Beck Oral Assessment Scores and Numerical Rating Scale pain scores. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests and Chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: Period 2 showed significantly lower infection rates (13.44 % vs. 19.48 %, p = 0.023), reduced pain scores (mean NRS: 4.6 vs. 5.4, p < 0.01) and improved mucosal health (mean BOAS: 2.91 vs. 3.75, p < 0.001).
Discussion: The professional oral hygiene protocol reduced postoperative complications, improved oral health, and enhanced patient comfort. These findings support the integration of structured oral hygiene measures into standard maxillofacial surgical care to optimize outcomes and quality of life.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.