国立卫生研究院:麻醉学研究经费的性别差异分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mah I Kan Changez, Amolpreet S Toor, Maida Tiwana, Sarmad Masud, Denise J Wooding, Faisal Khosa
{"title":"国立卫生研究院:麻醉学研究经费的性别差异分析。","authors":"Mah I Kan Changez, Amolpreet S Toor, Maida Tiwana, Sarmad Masud, Denise J Wooding, Faisal Khosa","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2025.2460664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although studies have shown an increase in the representation of women in academic anesthesiology, it remains one of the medical specialties most dominated by men. While gender disparities have been identified in academic anesthesiology, literature on discrepancies in funding allocated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is scarce. The objective of the present study was to explore these discrepancies from 2017 to 2020 and assess potential changes in funding trends over time. Publicly available funding data was retrospectively obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure and Results (RePORTER) database for fiscal years 2017 to 2020. Information regarding each principal investigator (PI) was obtained from the Scopus database and institutional websites. For statistical comparison of continuous variables, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Simple linear regression analyses assessed the relationship between fiscal year and number of NIH grants awarded to PIs. Median NIH amount per grant [interquartile range (IQR)] was determined to be $359,038 ($233,947-$476,933) for PIs that were men, greater than that of $330,865 ($164,268-$458,785) for PIs that were women (<i>p</i> < .05). Similarly, men received a greater median NIH grant amount per PI, with a value of $348,751 ($222,043-$442,075), compared to women who received $268,634 ($161,159-$414,384) (<i>p</i> < .05). When stratified by terminal degree, significantly higher median grant amounts (<i>p</i> < .05) were awarded to MD and PhD holders who were men versus their women counterparts. Lastly, an increasing trend in obtaining NIH grants between 2017 and 2020 was observed for PIs that were men overall, including PIs holding MD/PhD degrees (<i>p</i> < .05). No such trend was observed for PIs who were women. This study demonstrates a significantly greater number of NIH grants and higher award values allocated to researchers who were men than researchers who were women in academic anesthesiology over the past four years. Moreover, an increase in the number of grants secured by PIs who were women from 2017-2020 was not observed. In the future, longitudinal trends in NIH funding for principal investigators (PIs) of both genders in anesthesiology should be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":" ","pages":"208-218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National institutes of health: Analysis of gender differences in anesthesiology research funding.\",\"authors\":\"Mah I Kan Changez, Amolpreet S Toor, Maida Tiwana, Sarmad Masud, Denise J Wooding, Faisal Khosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03630242.2025.2460664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although studies have shown an increase in the representation of women in academic anesthesiology, it remains one of the medical specialties most dominated by men. While gender disparities have been identified in academic anesthesiology, literature on discrepancies in funding allocated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is scarce. The objective of the present study was to explore these discrepancies from 2017 to 2020 and assess potential changes in funding trends over time. Publicly available funding data was retrospectively obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure and Results (RePORTER) database for fiscal years 2017 to 2020. Information regarding each principal investigator (PI) was obtained from the Scopus database and institutional websites. For statistical comparison of continuous variables, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Simple linear regression analyses assessed the relationship between fiscal year and number of NIH grants awarded to PIs. Median NIH amount per grant [interquartile range (IQR)] was determined to be $359,038 ($233,947-$476,933) for PIs that were men, greater than that of $330,865 ($164,268-$458,785) for PIs that were women (<i>p</i> < .05). Similarly, men received a greater median NIH grant amount per PI, with a value of $348,751 ($222,043-$442,075), compared to women who received $268,634 ($161,159-$414,384) (<i>p</i> < .05). When stratified by terminal degree, significantly higher median grant amounts (<i>p</i> < .05) were awarded to MD and PhD holders who were men versus their women counterparts. Lastly, an increasing trend in obtaining NIH grants between 2017 and 2020 was observed for PIs that were men overall, including PIs holding MD/PhD degrees (<i>p</i> < .05). No such trend was observed for PIs who were women. This study demonstrates a significantly greater number of NIH grants and higher award values allocated to researchers who were men than researchers who were women in academic anesthesiology over the past four years. Moreover, an increase in the number of grants secured by PIs who were women from 2017-2020 was not observed. In the future, longitudinal trends in NIH funding for principal investigators (PIs) of both genders in anesthesiology should be investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"208-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2460664\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2460664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然研究表明,在学术麻醉学中,女性的代表性有所增加,但它仍然是男性占主导地位的医学专业之一。虽然在学术麻醉学中已经发现了性别差异,但关于美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)拨款差异的文献很少。本研究的目的是探讨从2017年到2020年的这些差异,并评估随着时间的推移资金趋势的潜在变化。公开可用的资金数据回顾性地从NIH研究组合在线报告工具支出和结果(RePORTER)数据库中获得2017至2020财政年度。每位主要研究者(PI)的信息均来自Scopus数据库和各机构网站。对于连续变量的统计比较,采用Mann-Whitney U检验。简单的线性回归分析评估了财政年度与NIH授予pi的拨款数量之间的关系。NIH每笔拨款的中位数[四分位数范围(IQR)]确定为男性pi为359,038美元(233,947美元- 476,933美元),高于女性pi为330,865美元(164,268美元- 458,785美元)(p p p p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National institutes of health: Analysis of gender differences in anesthesiology research funding.

Although studies have shown an increase in the representation of women in academic anesthesiology, it remains one of the medical specialties most dominated by men. While gender disparities have been identified in academic anesthesiology, literature on discrepancies in funding allocated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is scarce. The objective of the present study was to explore these discrepancies from 2017 to 2020 and assess potential changes in funding trends over time. Publicly available funding data was retrospectively obtained from the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditure and Results (RePORTER) database for fiscal years 2017 to 2020. Information regarding each principal investigator (PI) was obtained from the Scopus database and institutional websites. For statistical comparison of continuous variables, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed. Simple linear regression analyses assessed the relationship between fiscal year and number of NIH grants awarded to PIs. Median NIH amount per grant [interquartile range (IQR)] was determined to be $359,038 ($233,947-$476,933) for PIs that were men, greater than that of $330,865 ($164,268-$458,785) for PIs that were women (p < .05). Similarly, men received a greater median NIH grant amount per PI, with a value of $348,751 ($222,043-$442,075), compared to women who received $268,634 ($161,159-$414,384) (p < .05). When stratified by terminal degree, significantly higher median grant amounts (p < .05) were awarded to MD and PhD holders who were men versus their women counterparts. Lastly, an increasing trend in obtaining NIH grants between 2017 and 2020 was observed for PIs that were men overall, including PIs holding MD/PhD degrees (p < .05). No such trend was observed for PIs who were women. This study demonstrates a significantly greater number of NIH grants and higher award values allocated to researchers who were men than researchers who were women in academic anesthesiology over the past four years. Moreover, an increase in the number of grants secured by PIs who were women from 2017-2020 was not observed. In the future, longitudinal trends in NIH funding for principal investigators (PIs) of both genders in anesthesiology should be investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信