印度农村怀孕留守妇女的健康经历:NFHS-5调查数据研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shakeel Ahmed, Sandhya R Mahapatro
{"title":"印度农村怀孕留守妇女的健康经历:NFHS-5调查数据研究","authors":"Shakeel Ahmed, Sandhya R Mahapatro","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2025.2459759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a descriptive study based on National Family Health Survey- Round 5 (2020-21) dataset, comparing two groups of Indian women: \"stay-behind pregnant women\" and \"women who are living with their husbands.\" We applied z-test analyzing health status and healthcare access between the two groups. The result shows both health status (D<sub>Mean Hemoglobin</sub> = -2.02, <i>p</i> = .002; <sub>DMean Sys BP</sub> = -2.48, <i>p</i> = .001; D<sub>Mean Dias BP</sub> = -1.53, <i>p</i> = .003; D<sub>Anemic</sub> = 0.04, <i>p</i> = .006) and healthcare access (D<sub>Access to public healthcare</sub> = -4.6 percent, <i>p</i> = .005; D<sub>Access to private healthcare</sub> = 10.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002, D<sub>Others</sub> = -9.3 percent, <i>p</i> = .001) are significantly lower among \"stay-behind pregnant women.\" The intake of nutritious food among stay-behind pregnant women is relatively low (D<sub>Pulses</sub> = -7.9 percent, <i>p</i> = .003; D<sub>Veg</sub> = -3.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002; D<sub>Fruits</sub> = -5.5 percent, 0.005; D<sub>Eggs</sub> = -3.8 percent, <i>p</i> = .004; D<sub>Meat</sub> = -3.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002) which contributes to their poor health status. Overall, it is concluded that the health status and healthcare access of \"stay-behind pregnant women\" are poorer than others. Future studies can explore the role of empowerment of \"stay-behind pregnant women\" in ensuring their better health and healthcare access.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":" ","pages":"197-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health experience for pregnant stay-behind women in rural India: A study on NFHS-5 survey data.\",\"authors\":\"Shakeel Ahmed, Sandhya R Mahapatro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03630242.2025.2459759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This is a descriptive study based on National Family Health Survey- Round 5 (2020-21) dataset, comparing two groups of Indian women: \\\"stay-behind pregnant women\\\" and \\\"women who are living with their husbands.\\\" We applied z-test analyzing health status and healthcare access between the two groups. The result shows both health status (D<sub>Mean Hemoglobin</sub> = -2.02, <i>p</i> = .002; <sub>DMean Sys BP</sub> = -2.48, <i>p</i> = .001; D<sub>Mean Dias BP</sub> = -1.53, <i>p</i> = .003; D<sub>Anemic</sub> = 0.04, <i>p</i> = .006) and healthcare access (D<sub>Access to public healthcare</sub> = -4.6 percent, <i>p</i> = .005; D<sub>Access to private healthcare</sub> = 10.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002, D<sub>Others</sub> = -9.3 percent, <i>p</i> = .001) are significantly lower among \\\"stay-behind pregnant women.\\\" The intake of nutritious food among stay-behind pregnant women is relatively low (D<sub>Pulses</sub> = -7.9 percent, <i>p</i> = .003; D<sub>Veg</sub> = -3.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002; D<sub>Fruits</sub> = -5.5 percent, 0.005; D<sub>Eggs</sub> = -3.8 percent, <i>p</i> = .004; D<sub>Meat</sub> = -3.4 percent, <i>p</i> = .002) which contributes to their poor health status. Overall, it is concluded that the health status and healthcare access of \\\"stay-behind pregnant women\\\" are poorer than others. Future studies can explore the role of empowerment of \\\"stay-behind pregnant women\\\" in ensuring their better health and healthcare access.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2459759\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2459759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一项基于全国家庭健康调查-第5轮(2020-21)数据集的描述性研究,比较了两组印度妇女:“留守孕妇”和“与丈夫同住的妇女”。我们应用z检验分析两组之间的健康状况和医疗保健可及性。结果显示两组健康状况(DMean Hemoglobin = -2.02, p = 0.002;DMean Sys BP = -2.48, p = .001;DMean Dias BP = -1.53, p = 0.003;贫血= 0.04,p = 0.006)和医疗保健可及性(公共医疗保健可及性= - 4.6%,p = 0.005;获得私人医疗保健= 10.4%,p =。002, DOthers = - 9.3%, p = .001)在“留守孕妇”中明显更低。留守孕妇营养食物的摄入量相对较低(d豆类= - 7.9%,p = 0.003;DVeg = - 3.4%, p = 0.002;DFruits = - 5.5%, 0.005;鸡蛋= - 3.8%,p = 0.004;肉类= - 3.4%,p = .002),这导致他们的健康状况不佳。总体而言,“留守孕妇”的健康状况和获得保健服务的机会比其他孕妇差。未来的研究可以探索赋予“留守孕妇”权力在确保她们更好的健康和获得医疗保健方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health experience for pregnant stay-behind women in rural India: A study on NFHS-5 survey data.

This is a descriptive study based on National Family Health Survey- Round 5 (2020-21) dataset, comparing two groups of Indian women: "stay-behind pregnant women" and "women who are living with their husbands." We applied z-test analyzing health status and healthcare access between the two groups. The result shows both health status (DMean Hemoglobin = -2.02, p = .002; DMean Sys BP = -2.48, p = .001; DMean Dias BP = -1.53, p = .003; DAnemic = 0.04, p = .006) and healthcare access (DAccess to public healthcare = -4.6 percent, p = .005; DAccess to private healthcare = 10.4 percent, p = .002, DOthers = -9.3 percent, p = .001) are significantly lower among "stay-behind pregnant women." The intake of nutritious food among stay-behind pregnant women is relatively low (DPulses = -7.9 percent, p = .003; DVeg = -3.4 percent, p = .002; DFruits = -5.5 percent, 0.005; DEggs = -3.8 percent, p = .004; DMeat = -3.4 percent, p = .002) which contributes to their poor health status. Overall, it is concluded that the health status and healthcare access of "stay-behind pregnant women" are poorer than others. Future studies can explore the role of empowerment of "stay-behind pregnant women" in ensuring their better health and healthcare access.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信