美国种族/民族和出生亚群产前护理利用的差异。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Choi Sugy , Pearl A. McElfish , Clare C. Brown
{"title":"美国种族/民族和出生亚群产前护理利用的差异。","authors":"Choi Sugy ,&nbsp;Pearl A. McElfish ,&nbsp;Clare C. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate disparities in prenatal care among granular (disaggregated) racial/ethnic subgroups overall and by nativity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed singleton live births among United States (US) residents from the National Center for Health Statistics Birth Certificate Data (2018–2022) to evaluate first trimester prenatal care initiation and prenatal care adequacy using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions and used marginal effects to assess adjusted differences among 7 broad racial/ethnic categories (e.g., Asian) and 16 disaggregated subgroups (e.g., Chinese). Disaggregated subgroups came from Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and Hispanic categories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the sample (<em>n</em> = 15,882,850), 78.4 % had first trimester prenatal care, and 76.2 % had adequate prenatal care. Adjusted rates of first trimester prenatal care ranged from 60.1 % among NHPI individuals to 82.5 % among White individuals, and prenatal care adequacy ranged from 54.3 % among NHPI individuals to 80.1 % among White individuals. Compared to US-born individuals, foreign-born individuals had lower first trimester care and prenatal care adequacy among most racial/ethnic broad categories and subgroups. The rates of both outcomes among each NHPI subgroup were lower than every other racial/ethnic subgroup evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant disparities in first trimester prenatal care initiation and adequacy exist based on race/ethnicity and nativity, with the largest disparities among NHPI individuals. These findings highlight the need for focused public health interventions to address disparities in prenatal care access and quality, ultimately promoting both infant and maternal health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 108238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in prenatal care utilization among racial/ethnic and nativity subgroups in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Choi Sugy ,&nbsp;Pearl A. McElfish ,&nbsp;Clare C. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate disparities in prenatal care among granular (disaggregated) racial/ethnic subgroups overall and by nativity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed singleton live births among United States (US) residents from the National Center for Health Statistics Birth Certificate Data (2018–2022) to evaluate first trimester prenatal care initiation and prenatal care adequacy using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions and used marginal effects to assess adjusted differences among 7 broad racial/ethnic categories (e.g., Asian) and 16 disaggregated subgroups (e.g., Chinese). Disaggregated subgroups came from Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and Hispanic categories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the sample (<em>n</em> = 15,882,850), 78.4 % had first trimester prenatal care, and 76.2 % had adequate prenatal care. Adjusted rates of first trimester prenatal care ranged from 60.1 % among NHPI individuals to 82.5 % among White individuals, and prenatal care adequacy ranged from 54.3 % among NHPI individuals to 80.1 % among White individuals. Compared to US-born individuals, foreign-born individuals had lower first trimester care and prenatal care adequacy among most racial/ethnic broad categories and subgroups. The rates of both outcomes among each NHPI subgroup were lower than every other racial/ethnic subgroup evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significant disparities in first trimester prenatal care initiation and adequacy exist based on race/ethnicity and nativity, with the largest disparities among NHPI individuals. These findings highlight the need for focused public health interventions to address disparities in prenatal care access and quality, ultimately promoting both infant and maternal health equity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743525000210\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743525000210","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估颗粒(分类)种族/民族亚群总体和出生的产前护理差异。方法:我们分析了美国(US)居民中来自国家卫生统计中心出生证明数据(2018-2022)的单胎活产婴儿,使用产前护理利用指数的充分性来评估妊娠早期产前护理的开始和产前护理的充分性。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,并使用边际效应来评估7个广泛的种族/民族类别(如亚洲人)和16个分类亚组(如中国人)之间的调整差异。细分的亚组来自亚洲人、夏威夷原住民和其他太平洋岛民(NHPI)和西班牙裔。结果:在样本(n = 15,882,850)中,78.4%的人有妊娠早期产前护理,76.2%的人有充分的产前护理。产前护理调整率在白人中从60.1%到82.5%不等,产前护理充足性在白人中从54.3%到80.1%不等。与美国出生的人相比,在大多数种族/民族大类和亚组中,外国出生的人的妊娠早期护理和产前护理充分性较低。在每个NHPI亚组中,这两种结果的发生率都低于评估的所有其他种族/族裔亚组。结论:基于种族/民族和出生,早期孕期产前护理的启动和充足性存在显著差异,其中NHPI个体差异最大。这些发现突出表明,需要有重点的公共卫生干预措施,以解决产前护理机会和质量方面的差异,最终促进婴儿和孕产妇保健公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disparities in prenatal care utilization among racial/ethnic and nativity subgroups in the United States

Objective

To evaluate disparities in prenatal care among granular (disaggregated) racial/ethnic subgroups overall and by nativity.

Methods

We analyzed singleton live births among United States (US) residents from the National Center for Health Statistics Birth Certificate Data (2018–2022) to evaluate first trimester prenatal care initiation and prenatal care adequacy using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. We conducted multivariable logistic regressions and used marginal effects to assess adjusted differences among 7 broad racial/ethnic categories (e.g., Asian) and 16 disaggregated subgroups (e.g., Chinese). Disaggregated subgroups came from Asian, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHPI) and Hispanic categories.

Results

Among the sample (n = 15,882,850), 78.4 % had first trimester prenatal care, and 76.2 % had adequate prenatal care. Adjusted rates of first trimester prenatal care ranged from 60.1 % among NHPI individuals to 82.5 % among White individuals, and prenatal care adequacy ranged from 54.3 % among NHPI individuals to 80.1 % among White individuals. Compared to US-born individuals, foreign-born individuals had lower first trimester care and prenatal care adequacy among most racial/ethnic broad categories and subgroups. The rates of both outcomes among each NHPI subgroup were lower than every other racial/ethnic subgroup evaluated.

Conclusions

Significant disparities in first trimester prenatal care initiation and adequacy exist based on race/ethnicity and nativity, with the largest disparities among NHPI individuals. These findings highlight the need for focused public health interventions to address disparities in prenatal care access and quality, ultimately promoting both infant and maternal health equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信