英国非洲黑人和加勒比黑人后裔妇女乳腺癌筛查障碍和旨在提高参与的干预措施的系统回顾。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Anietie E Aliu, Robert S Kerrison, Afrodita Marcu
{"title":"英国非洲黑人和加勒比黑人后裔妇女乳腺癌筛查障碍和旨在提高参与的干预措施的系统回顾。","authors":"Anietie E Aliu, Robert S Kerrison, Afrodita Marcu","doi":"10.1002/pon.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared with the general population, Black African and Black Caribbean women, living in the UK, are less likely to participate in breast cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this review were to: (1) systematically describe the barriers to breast cancer screening, experienced by women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent, living in the UK and (2) identify which barriers interventions attempting to reduce inequalities have targeted, and whether they have been effective at increasing participation in breast cancer screening, among women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of primary research published in peer-reviewed journals. Seven databases were searched, yielding eight articles for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to breast cancer screening participation were categorised into six analytical themes: 'Understanding of, and concerns about, breast screening, the procedure and the reliability of test results', 'Misconceptions about, and lack of understanding of, the causes of breast cancer and personal risk', 'Emotional responses to cancer and screening', 'General barriers to accessing healthcare services (including breast screening)', 'Beliefs about cancer as a treatable disease' and 'Religious beliefs, cultural taboos and stigma'. These findings derive largely from studies with women who were not eligible for screening. Four studies testing interventions to promote uptake among ethnic minority groups were identified. None of them targeted Black African or Black Caribbean women, specifically; however, it was possible to extract data, for these groups, from the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research with women who are eligible for screening (but do not attend) is needed to verify the findings of this review. Studies targeting barriers experienced by Black women, particularly, are needed to reduce inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70093"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening, and of Interventions Designed to Increase Participation, Among Women of Black African and Black Caribbean Descent in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Anietie E Aliu, Robert S Kerrison, Afrodita Marcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.70093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared with the general population, Black African and Black Caribbean women, living in the UK, are less likely to participate in breast cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this review were to: (1) systematically describe the barriers to breast cancer screening, experienced by women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent, living in the UK and (2) identify which barriers interventions attempting to reduce inequalities have targeted, and whether they have been effective at increasing participation in breast cancer screening, among women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of primary research published in peer-reviewed journals. Seven databases were searched, yielding eight articles for inclusion in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to breast cancer screening participation were categorised into six analytical themes: 'Understanding of, and concerns about, breast screening, the procedure and the reliability of test results', 'Misconceptions about, and lack of understanding of, the causes of breast cancer and personal risk', 'Emotional responses to cancer and screening', 'General barriers to accessing healthcare services (including breast screening)', 'Beliefs about cancer as a treatable disease' and 'Religious beliefs, cultural taboos and stigma'. These findings derive largely from studies with women who were not eligible for screening. Four studies testing interventions to promote uptake among ethnic minority groups were identified. None of them targeted Black African or Black Caribbean women, specifically; however, it was possible to extract data, for these groups, from the studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further research with women who are eligible for screening (but do not attend) is needed to verify the findings of this review. Studies targeting barriers experienced by Black women, particularly, are needed to reduce inequalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"e70093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho‐Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70093\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与一般人群相比,生活在英国的非洲黑人和加勒比黑人妇女参加乳腺癌筛查的可能性较低。目的:本综述的目的是:(1)系统地描述生活在英国的非洲黑人和加勒比黑人后裔妇女在乳腺癌筛查方面遇到的障碍;(2)确定试图减少不平等的干预措施针对哪些障碍,以及这些干预措施是否有效地增加了非洲黑人和加勒比黑人后裔妇女对乳腺癌筛查的参与。方法:我们对发表在同行评议期刊上的主要研究进行了混合方法的系统综述。在7个数据库中进行了检索,得到8篇文章纳入综述。结果:参与乳腺癌筛查的障碍分为六个分析主题:“对乳腺癌筛查、程序和检测结果可靠性的理解和关注”、“对乳腺癌病因和个人风险的误解和不了解”、“对癌症和筛查的情绪反应”、“获得保健服务(包括乳腺癌筛查)的一般障碍”、“认为癌症是一种可治疗疾病的信念”和“宗教信仰、文化禁忌和耻辱”。这些发现主要来自对不符合筛查条件的妇女的研究。确定了四项测试干预措施以促进少数民族群体吸收的研究。他们都没有专门针对非洲黑人或加勒比黑人妇女;然而,从这些研究中提取这些群体的数据是可能的。结论:需要对有资格接受筛查(但未参加筛查)的女性进行进一步研究,以验证本综述的发现。为了减少不平等现象,特别需要针对黑人妇女遇到的障碍进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening, and of Interventions Designed to Increase Participation, Among Women of Black African and Black Caribbean Descent in the UK.

Background: Compared with the general population, Black African and Black Caribbean women, living in the UK, are less likely to participate in breast cancer screening.

Aims: The aims of this review were to: (1) systematically describe the barriers to breast cancer screening, experienced by women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent, living in the UK and (2) identify which barriers interventions attempting to reduce inequalities have targeted, and whether they have been effective at increasing participation in breast cancer screening, among women of Black African and Black Caribbean descent.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of primary research published in peer-reviewed journals. Seven databases were searched, yielding eight articles for inclusion in the review.

Results: Barriers to breast cancer screening participation were categorised into six analytical themes: 'Understanding of, and concerns about, breast screening, the procedure and the reliability of test results', 'Misconceptions about, and lack of understanding of, the causes of breast cancer and personal risk', 'Emotional responses to cancer and screening', 'General barriers to accessing healthcare services (including breast screening)', 'Beliefs about cancer as a treatable disease' and 'Religious beliefs, cultural taboos and stigma'. These findings derive largely from studies with women who were not eligible for screening. Four studies testing interventions to promote uptake among ethnic minority groups were identified. None of them targeted Black African or Black Caribbean women, specifically; however, it was possible to extract data, for these groups, from the studies.

Conclusion: Further research with women who are eligible for screening (but do not attend) is needed to verify the findings of this review. Studies targeting barriers experienced by Black women, particularly, are needed to reduce inequalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信