抗xa直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在V - Leiden因子和凝血酶原G20210A纯合突变患者中的疗效和安全性

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ofir Dan, Oleg Pikovsky, Tomer Kerman, Shirly Amar, Anat Rabinovich
{"title":"抗xa直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在V - Leiden因子和凝血酶原G20210A纯合突变患者中的疗效和安全性","authors":"Ofir Dan, Oleg Pikovsky, Tomer Kerman, Shirly Amar, Anat Rabinovich","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03069-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PGM) are the most common types of inherited thrombophilia, predisposing to increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. The homozygous and compound heterozygous forms of these mutations are extremely rare. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as the primary treatment for VTE, data on their use in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia are limited. To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. VKA in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL and PGM. This retrospective cohort study included adults with homozygous/compound heterozygous FVL and/or PGM who experienced a thrombotic event between 2000 and 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent thrombosis in patients with high-risk inherited thrombophilia treated with DOACs versus VKAs. The secondary outcome included a comparison of rates of bleeding complications between these groups. The types of bleeding were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Of 56 patients included 28 received DOACs and 28 received VKAs. There was no significant difference in recurrent VTE rates (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 0/28, 0% VKA group) or major bleeding (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 1/28, 3.6% VKA group). This is the largest cohort of patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, providing valuable insights into DOAC use in this group. The findings suggest that DOACs may represent an effective and safe alternative to VKAs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and optimize anticoagulant management in this challenging patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"188-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients homozygous for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations.\",\"authors\":\"Ofir Dan, Oleg Pikovsky, Tomer Kerman, Shirly Amar, Anat Rabinovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-025-03069-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PGM) are the most common types of inherited thrombophilia, predisposing to increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. The homozygous and compound heterozygous forms of these mutations are extremely rare. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as the primary treatment for VTE, data on their use in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia are limited. To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. VKA in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL and PGM. This retrospective cohort study included adults with homozygous/compound heterozygous FVL and/or PGM who experienced a thrombotic event between 2000 and 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent thrombosis in patients with high-risk inherited thrombophilia treated with DOACs versus VKAs. The secondary outcome included a comparison of rates of bleeding complications between these groups. The types of bleeding were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Of 56 patients included 28 received DOACs and 28 received VKAs. There was no significant difference in recurrent VTE rates (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 0/28, 0% VKA group) or major bleeding (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 1/28, 3.6% VKA group). This is the largest cohort of patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, providing valuable insights into DOAC use in this group. The findings suggest that DOACs may represent an effective and safe alternative to VKAs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and optimize anticoagulant management in this challenging patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"188-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03069-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03069-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因子V Leiden (FVL)和凝血酶原G20210A突变(PGM)是最常见的遗传性血栓病类型,易增加静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险。这些突变的纯合和复合杂合形式极为罕见。虽然直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)已取代维生素K拮抗剂(vka)成为静脉血栓栓塞的主要治疗方法,但其在高危遗传性血栓患者中的应用数据有限。比较DOACs与VKA治疗包括FVL和PGM在内的高危遗传性血栓患者的疗效和安全性。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2000年至2022年间发生血栓事件的纯合子/复合杂合子FVL和/或PGM的成年人。研究的主要终点是高危遗传性血栓患者接受doac与vka治疗后血栓复发的发生率。次要结果包括两组间出血并发症发生率的比较。根据ISTH标准确定出血类型。56例患者中28例接受doac治疗,28例接受vka治疗。静脉血栓栓塞复发率(1/ 28,3.6% DOAC组vs. 0/ 28,0% VKA组)或大出血(1/ 28,3.6% DOAC组vs. 1/ 28,3.6% VKA组)无显著差异。这是最大的高风险遗传性血栓患者队列,为DOAC在该组中的应用提供了有价值的见解。研究结果表明,doac可能是vka的一种有效和安全的替代方案。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果,并优化这一具有挑战性的患者群体的抗凝治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients homozygous for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations.

Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A mutation (PGM) are the most common types of inherited thrombophilia, predisposing to increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. The homozygous and compound heterozygous forms of these mutations are extremely rare. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as the primary treatment for VTE, data on their use in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia are limited. To compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. VKA in patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL and PGM. This retrospective cohort study included adults with homozygous/compound heterozygous FVL and/or PGM who experienced a thrombotic event between 2000 and 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent thrombosis in patients with high-risk inherited thrombophilia treated with DOACs versus VKAs. The secondary outcome included a comparison of rates of bleeding complications between these groups. The types of bleeding were defined according to the ISTH criteria. Of 56 patients included 28 received DOACs and 28 received VKAs. There was no significant difference in recurrent VTE rates (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 0/28, 0% VKA group) or major bleeding (1/28, 3.6% DOAC group vs. 1/28, 3.6% VKA group). This is the largest cohort of patients with high-risk hereditary thrombophilia, providing valuable insights into DOAC use in this group. The findings suggest that DOACs may represent an effective and safe alternative to VKAs. Further research is warranted to confirm these results and optimize anticoagulant management in this challenging patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信