Nabila M H Ali, Samuel J R A Chawner, Leila Kushan-Wells, Carrie E Bearden, Jennifer Gladys Mulle, Rebecca M Pollak, Raquel E Gur, Wendy K Chung, Michael J Owen, Marianne B M van den Bree
{"title":"30种罕见变异基因型自闭症域的比较。","authors":"Nabila M H Ali, Samuel J R A Chawner, Leila Kushan-Wells, Carrie E Bearden, Jennifer Gladys Mulle, Rebecca M Pollak, Raquel E Gur, Wendy K Chung, Michael J Owen, Marianne B M van den Bree","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of Neurodevelopmental risk Copy Number Variants (ND-CNVs) and Single Gene Variants (SGVs) are strongly linked to elevated likelihood of autism. However, few studies have examined the impact on autism phenotypes across a wide range of rare variant genotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) scores (total and subdomains: social, communication, repetitive behaviour) in 1314 young people with one of thirty rare variant genotypes (15 ND-CNVs; n = 1005, 9.2 ± 3.5 years and 15 SGVs; n = 309, 8.3 ± 4.0 years). Comparisons were also conducted with young people without known genetic conditions (controls; n = 460, 10.6 ± 3.4 years) and with idiopathic autism (n = 480, 8.6 ± 3.2 years).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The prevalence of indicative autism (SCQ ≥ 22) was higher in those with a rare variant genotype compared to controls (32% vs 2%; OR = 43.1, CI = 6.6-282.2, p < 0.001) and in those with SGVs compared to ND-CNVs (53% vs 25%; OR = 4.00, CI = 2.2-7.3, p = 0.002). The prevalence of indicative autism varied considerably across the 30 rare variant genotypes (range 10-85%). SGVs were associated with greater impairment in total, social, communication and repetitive behaviour subdomains than ND-CNVs. However, genotype explained limited variation in these scores (η<sup>2</sup> between 11.8 and 21.4%), indicating more convergence than divergence in autism phenotype across rare variant genotypes. Comparisons with young people with idiopathic autism indicated no differences compared to those with ND-CNVs, whereas those with SGVs showed greater communication and less repetitive behaviour.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The likelihood of autism was higher across all rare variant genotypes, with individuals with SGVs showing higher prevalence and greater impairment compared to those with ND-CNVs. Despite subdomain-specific patterns, there was no strong evidence for specific genotype-phenotype associations. This suggests that rare variant genotypes alone may have limited predictive value for autism phenotypes and that other factors like polygenic risk and the environment are likely to play a role. Further research is needed in order to understand these influences, improve risk prediction and inform genetic counselling and interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was funded by the Tackling Multimorbidity at Scale Strategic Priorities Fund programme (MR/W014416/1) (van den Bree) delivered by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research in partnership with the Economic and Social Research Council and in collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. NIMH U01 MH119738-01 (van den Bree), IMAGINE study (Medical Research Council UK: MR/T033045/1; MR/N022572/1; and MR/L011166/1) (van den Bree) and Medical Research Council UK Centre Grant (MR/L010305/1) (Owen). SJRAC is funded by a Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW). We would also like to acknowledge NIH 1R01MH110701-01A1 (PI Mulle), U01MH119736 (CEB), R21MH116473 (CEB), and R01MH085953 (CEB), and the Simons Foundation (SFARI Explorer Award to CEB).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"112 ","pages":"105521"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of autism domains across thirty rare variant genotypes.\",\"authors\":\"Nabila M H Ali, Samuel J R A Chawner, Leila Kushan-Wells, Carrie E Bearden, Jennifer Gladys Mulle, Rebecca M Pollak, Raquel E Gur, Wendy K Chung, Michael J Owen, Marianne B M van den Bree\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of Neurodevelopmental risk Copy Number Variants (ND-CNVs) and Single Gene Variants (SGVs) are strongly linked to elevated likelihood of autism. However, few studies have examined the impact on autism phenotypes across a wide range of rare variant genotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) scores (total and subdomains: social, communication, repetitive behaviour) in 1314 young people with one of thirty rare variant genotypes (15 ND-CNVs; n = 1005, 9.2 ± 3.5 years and 15 SGVs; n = 309, 8.3 ± 4.0 years). Comparisons were also conducted with young people without known genetic conditions (controls; n = 460, 10.6 ± 3.4 years) and with idiopathic autism (n = 480, 8.6 ± 3.2 years).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The prevalence of indicative autism (SCQ ≥ 22) was higher in those with a rare variant genotype compared to controls (32% vs 2%; OR = 43.1, CI = 6.6-282.2, p < 0.001) and in those with SGVs compared to ND-CNVs (53% vs 25%; OR = 4.00, CI = 2.2-7.3, p = 0.002). The prevalence of indicative autism varied considerably across the 30 rare variant genotypes (range 10-85%). SGVs were associated with greater impairment in total, social, communication and repetitive behaviour subdomains than ND-CNVs. However, genotype explained limited variation in these scores (η<sup>2</sup> between 11.8 and 21.4%), indicating more convergence than divergence in autism phenotype across rare variant genotypes. Comparisons with young people with idiopathic autism indicated no differences compared to those with ND-CNVs, whereas those with SGVs showed greater communication and less repetitive behaviour.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The likelihood of autism was higher across all rare variant genotypes, with individuals with SGVs showing higher prevalence and greater impairment compared to those with ND-CNVs. Despite subdomain-specific patterns, there was no strong evidence for specific genotype-phenotype associations. This suggests that rare variant genotypes alone may have limited predictive value for autism phenotypes and that other factors like polygenic risk and the environment are likely to play a role. Further research is needed in order to understand these influences, improve risk prediction and inform genetic counselling and interventions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was funded by the Tackling Multimorbidity at Scale Strategic Priorities Fund programme (MR/W014416/1) (van den Bree) delivered by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research in partnership with the Economic and Social Research Council and in collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. NIMH U01 MH119738-01 (van den Bree), IMAGINE study (Medical Research Council UK: MR/T033045/1; MR/N022572/1; and MR/L011166/1) (van den Bree) and Medical Research Council UK Centre Grant (MR/L010305/1) (Owen). SJRAC is funded by a Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW). We would also like to acknowledge NIH 1R01MH110701-01A1 (PI Mulle), U01MH119736 (CEB), R21MH116473 (CEB), and R01MH085953 (CEB), and the Simons Foundation (SFARI Explorer Award to CEB).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"105521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105521\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105521","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多神经发育风险拷贝数变异(ND-CNVs)和单基因变异(SGVs)与自闭症的可能性升高密切相关。然而,很少有研究在广泛的罕见变异基因型中检查对自闭症表型的影响。方法:本研究比较了1314名具有30种罕见变异基因型(15种ND-CNVs;n = 1005, 9.2±3.5年,15例sgv;N = 309, 8.3±4.0年)。还与没有已知遗传条件的年轻人进行了比较(对照组;N = 460, 10.6±3.4岁)和特发性自闭症(N = 480, 8.6±3.2岁)。研究结果:与对照组相比,罕见变异基因型患者的指示性自闭症(SCQ≥22)患病率更高(32% vs 2%;OR = 43.1, CI = 6.6-282.2, p值在11.8 - 21.4%之间),表明罕见变异基因型中自闭症表型的趋同大于分化。与患有特发性自闭症的年轻人相比,ND-CNVs没有差异,而SGVs则表现出更多的沟通和更少的重复行为。解释:在所有罕见的变异基因型中,自闭症的可能性更高,与nd - cnv相比,sgv个体表现出更高的患病率和更大的损伤。尽管存在亚域特异性模式,但没有强有力的证据表明存在特定的基因型-表型关联。这表明,单独的罕见变异基因型可能对自闭症表型的预测价值有限,多基因风险和环境等其他因素可能起作用。为了了解这些影响、改进风险预测和为遗传咨询和干预提供信息,需要进一步的研究。资金:这项工作由医学研究理事会和国家卫生研究所与经济和社会研究理事会合作,并与工程和物理科学研究理事会合作实施的大规模解决多种疾病战略优先基金方案(MR/W014416/1) (van den Bree)资助。NIMH U01 MH119738-01 (van den Bree), IMAGINE研究(英国医学研究理事会:MR/T033045/1;先生/ N022572/1;MR/L011166/1) (van den Bree)和医学研究理事会英国中心补助金(MR/L010305/1) (Owen)。SJRAC由医学研究基金会奖学金(MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW)资助。我们还要感谢NIH 1R01MH110701-01A1 (PI Mulle), U01MH119736 (CEB), R21MH116473 (CEB)和R01MH085953 (CEB),以及西蒙斯基金会(SFARI探险家奖)。
Comparison of autism domains across thirty rare variant genotypes.
Background: A number of Neurodevelopmental risk Copy Number Variants (ND-CNVs) and Single Gene Variants (SGVs) are strongly linked to elevated likelihood of autism. However, few studies have examined the impact on autism phenotypes across a wide range of rare variant genotypes.
Methods: This study compared Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) scores (total and subdomains: social, communication, repetitive behaviour) in 1314 young people with one of thirty rare variant genotypes (15 ND-CNVs; n = 1005, 9.2 ± 3.5 years and 15 SGVs; n = 309, 8.3 ± 4.0 years). Comparisons were also conducted with young people without known genetic conditions (controls; n = 460, 10.6 ± 3.4 years) and with idiopathic autism (n = 480, 8.6 ± 3.2 years).
Findings: The prevalence of indicative autism (SCQ ≥ 22) was higher in those with a rare variant genotype compared to controls (32% vs 2%; OR = 43.1, CI = 6.6-282.2, p < 0.001) and in those with SGVs compared to ND-CNVs (53% vs 25%; OR = 4.00, CI = 2.2-7.3, p = 0.002). The prevalence of indicative autism varied considerably across the 30 rare variant genotypes (range 10-85%). SGVs were associated with greater impairment in total, social, communication and repetitive behaviour subdomains than ND-CNVs. However, genotype explained limited variation in these scores (η2 between 11.8 and 21.4%), indicating more convergence than divergence in autism phenotype across rare variant genotypes. Comparisons with young people with idiopathic autism indicated no differences compared to those with ND-CNVs, whereas those with SGVs showed greater communication and less repetitive behaviour.
Interpretation: The likelihood of autism was higher across all rare variant genotypes, with individuals with SGVs showing higher prevalence and greater impairment compared to those with ND-CNVs. Despite subdomain-specific patterns, there was no strong evidence for specific genotype-phenotype associations. This suggests that rare variant genotypes alone may have limited predictive value for autism phenotypes and that other factors like polygenic risk and the environment are likely to play a role. Further research is needed in order to understand these influences, improve risk prediction and inform genetic counselling and interventions.
Funding: This work was funded by the Tackling Multimorbidity at Scale Strategic Priorities Fund programme (MR/W014416/1) (van den Bree) delivered by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research in partnership with the Economic and Social Research Council and in collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. NIMH U01 MH119738-01 (van den Bree), IMAGINE study (Medical Research Council UK: MR/T033045/1; MR/N022572/1; and MR/L011166/1) (van den Bree) and Medical Research Council UK Centre Grant (MR/L010305/1) (Owen). SJRAC is funded by a Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW). We would also like to acknowledge NIH 1R01MH110701-01A1 (PI Mulle), U01MH119736 (CEB), R21MH116473 (CEB), and R01MH085953 (CEB), and the Simons Foundation (SFARI Explorer Award to CEB).
EBioMedicineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.