{"title":"PD-1阻断加化疗治疗癌源性非小细胞肺癌的疗效","authors":"Haowei Wang, Lei Cheng, Jian Chen, Peixin Chen, Zhuoran Tang, Qianyi Wang, Ying Ma, Chao Zhao, Xuefei Li, Tao Jiang, Fei Zhou, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has become the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. Oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC showed limited response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Whether NSCLC patients with oncogenic drivers could benefit from PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred twelve NSCLC patients with at least one oncogenic driver alteration received PD-1 plus chemotherapy or each monotherapy were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes differences among patients with different oncogenic drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two patients received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy, 57 received PD-1 blockade monotherapy and 93 received chemotherapy alone were included. Oncogenic driver mutations including KRAS (31.4%), EGFR (28.8%), HER2 (14.7%), BRAF (10.6%), RET (7.4%), and other mutations (7.1%) were identified. Patients with oncogenic drivers who received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy had significantly better outcomes compared to those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone (ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P < 0.001; median PFS: 10.0 [95% CI: 8.9-12.6] vs. 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-5.1] vs. 5.3 [95% CI: 4.5-6.2] months, P < 0.001; median OS: 26.0 [95% CI: 23.0-30.0] vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 9.6-19.8] vs. 16.1 [95% CI: 11.6-21.9] months, P < 0.001). The superior efficacy was consistently found in separate analyses for patients received first-line and second/third line treatments. Among individual gene alterations, patients with KRAS, EGFR, or BRAF mutations treated with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy achieved markedly improved PFS and OS than those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy was independently associated with better PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy than PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC, particularly in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF subgroups. These findings suggest that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy may be considered as an optional treatment option for patients without available targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 3","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with oncogenic-driven non-small-cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Haowei Wang, Lei Cheng, Jian Chen, Peixin Chen, Zhuoran Tang, Qianyi Wang, Ying Ma, Chao Zhao, Xuefei Li, Tao Jiang, Fei Zhou, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has become the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. Oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC showed limited response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Whether NSCLC patients with oncogenic drivers could benefit from PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred twelve NSCLC patients with at least one oncogenic driver alteration received PD-1 plus chemotherapy or each monotherapy were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes differences among patients with different oncogenic drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two patients received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy, 57 received PD-1 blockade monotherapy and 93 received chemotherapy alone were included. Oncogenic driver mutations including KRAS (31.4%), EGFR (28.8%), HER2 (14.7%), BRAF (10.6%), RET (7.4%), and other mutations (7.1%) were identified. Patients with oncogenic drivers who received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy had significantly better outcomes compared to those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone (ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P < 0.001; median PFS: 10.0 [95% CI: 8.9-12.6] vs. 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-5.1] vs. 5.3 [95% CI: 4.5-6.2] months, P < 0.001; median OS: 26.0 [95% CI: 23.0-30.0] vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 9.6-19.8] vs. 16.1 [95% CI: 11.6-21.9] months, P < 0.001). The superior efficacy was consistently found in separate analyses for patients received first-line and second/third line treatments. Among individual gene alterations, patients with KRAS, EGFR, or BRAF mutations treated with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy achieved markedly improved PFS and OS than those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy was independently associated with better PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy than PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC, particularly in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF subgroups. These findings suggest that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy may be considered as an optional treatment option for patients without available targeted therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"74 3\",\"pages\":\"89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:PD-1阻断加化疗已成为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者无致瘤驱动因素的一线治疗标准。肿瘤驱动的晚期NSCLC对PD-1阻断单药或单独化疗的反应有限。具有致癌驱动因素的非小细胞肺癌患者是否能从PD-1阻断加化疗中获益仍未确定。方法:312例至少有一种致癌驱动改变的非小细胞肺癌患者接受了PD-1联合化疗或每种单药治疗。比较客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),以评估不同致癌驱动因素患者的治疗结果差异。结果:PD-1阻断联合化疗162例,PD-1阻断单药治疗57例,单独化疗93例。发现的致癌驱动突变包括KRAS(31.4%)、EGFR(28.8%)、HER2(14.7%)、BRAF(10.6%)、RET(7.4%)和其他突变(7.1%)。与单独接受PD-1阻断或化疗的患者相比,接受PD-1阻断加化疗的癌源驱动患者的预后明显更好(ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P结论:PD-1阻断加化疗在癌源驱动的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中,特别是在KRAS、EGFR和BRAF亚组中,表现出优于PD-1阻断单药治疗或单独化疗的疗效。这些发现表明,PD-1阻断加化疗可能被认为是没有靶向治疗的患者的可选治疗选择。
Efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with oncogenic-driven non-small-cell lung cancer.
Background: PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has become the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. Oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC showed limited response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Whether NSCLC patients with oncogenic drivers could benefit from PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy remains undetermined.
Methods: Three hundred twelve NSCLC patients with at least one oncogenic driver alteration received PD-1 plus chemotherapy or each monotherapy were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes differences among patients with different oncogenic drivers.
Results: One hundred sixty-two patients received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy, 57 received PD-1 blockade monotherapy and 93 received chemotherapy alone were included. Oncogenic driver mutations including KRAS (31.4%), EGFR (28.8%), HER2 (14.7%), BRAF (10.6%), RET (7.4%), and other mutations (7.1%) were identified. Patients with oncogenic drivers who received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy had significantly better outcomes compared to those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone (ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P < 0.001; median PFS: 10.0 [95% CI: 8.9-12.6] vs. 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-5.1] vs. 5.3 [95% CI: 4.5-6.2] months, P < 0.001; median OS: 26.0 [95% CI: 23.0-30.0] vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 9.6-19.8] vs. 16.1 [95% CI: 11.6-21.9] months, P < 0.001). The superior efficacy was consistently found in separate analyses for patients received first-line and second/third line treatments. Among individual gene alterations, patients with KRAS, EGFR, or BRAF mutations treated with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy achieved markedly improved PFS and OS than those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy was independently associated with better PFS and OS.
Conclusion: PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy than PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC, particularly in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF subgroups. These findings suggest that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy may be considered as an optional treatment option for patients without available targeted therapies.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions.
The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.