Varinder K. Randhawa MD, PhD , David A. Baran MD , Manreet K. Kanwar MD , Jaime A. Hernandez-Montfort MD, MPH, MSc , Shashank S. Sinha MD, MSc , Christopher F. Barnett MD, MPH , Filio Billia MD, PhD
{"title":"心源性休克并发急性心肌梗死和晚期心力衰竭的比较流行病学、病理生理学和治疗","authors":"Varinder K. Randhawa MD, PhD , David A. Baran MD , Manreet K. Kanwar MD , Jaime A. Hernandez-Montfort MD, MPH, MSc , Shashank S. Sinha MD, MSc , Christopher F. Barnett MD, MPH , Filio Billia MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock (CS) results from low cardiac output caused by myocardial dysfunction, coupled with systemic end-organ tissue hypoperfusion and elevated ventricular filling pressures, along a spectrum of shock severity. This narrative review aims to compare the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and contemporary management of 2 common etiologies of CS caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and advanced heart failure (HF-CS). CS complicates up to 14% of AMI and 5% of HF admissions. Rapid therapeutic intervention after prompt recognition of CS etiology is the mainstay toward improving clinical outcomes and mitigating end-organ sequelae and death. In AMI-CS, persistent hypotension often leads to subsequent hypoperfusion and congestion, and early culprit coronary artery lesion revascularization is critical. In HF-CS, congestion often precedes hypoperfusion and hypotension, and targeting the underlying nonischemic cause of myocardial dysfunction is key. Tailoring of hemodynamic strategies with vasoactive agents and temporary mechanical circulatory and end-organ support to manage the predominant ventricular failure, hemometabolic phenotypes, and shock severity associated with each etiology is discussed. Given the limited evidence-base in CS care, we also highlight potential knowledge gaps ripe for future exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 573-586"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Cardiogenic Shock Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Heart Failure\",\"authors\":\"Varinder K. Randhawa MD, PhD , David A. Baran MD , Manreet K. Kanwar MD , Jaime A. Hernandez-Montfort MD, MPH, MSc , Shashank S. Sinha MD, MSc , Christopher F. Barnett MD, MPH , Filio Billia MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.01.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock (CS) results from low cardiac output caused by myocardial dysfunction, coupled with systemic end-organ tissue hypoperfusion and elevated ventricular filling pressures, along a spectrum of shock severity. This narrative review aims to compare the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and contemporary management of 2 common etiologies of CS caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and advanced heart failure (HF-CS). CS complicates up to 14% of AMI and 5% of HF admissions. Rapid therapeutic intervention after prompt recognition of CS etiology is the mainstay toward improving clinical outcomes and mitigating end-organ sequelae and death. In AMI-CS, persistent hypotension often leads to subsequent hypoperfusion and congestion, and early culprit coronary artery lesion revascularization is critical. In HF-CS, congestion often precedes hypoperfusion and hypotension, and targeting the underlying nonischemic cause of myocardial dysfunction is key. Tailoring of hemodynamic strategies with vasoactive agents and temporary mechanical circulatory and end-organ support to manage the predominant ventricular failure, hemometabolic phenotypes, and shock severity associated with each etiology is discussed. Given the limited evidence-base in CS care, we also highlight potential knowledge gaps ripe for future exploration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 573-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X25000972\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X25000972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Comparative Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Cardiogenic Shock Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Heart Failure
Cardiogenic shock (CS) results from low cardiac output caused by myocardial dysfunction, coupled with systemic end-organ tissue hypoperfusion and elevated ventricular filling pressures, along a spectrum of shock severity. This narrative review aims to compare the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and contemporary management of 2 common etiologies of CS caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and advanced heart failure (HF-CS). CS complicates up to 14% of AMI and 5% of HF admissions. Rapid therapeutic intervention after prompt recognition of CS etiology is the mainstay toward improving clinical outcomes and mitigating end-organ sequelae and death. In AMI-CS, persistent hypotension often leads to subsequent hypoperfusion and congestion, and early culprit coronary artery lesion revascularization is critical. In HF-CS, congestion often precedes hypoperfusion and hypotension, and targeting the underlying nonischemic cause of myocardial dysfunction is key. Tailoring of hemodynamic strategies with vasoactive agents and temporary mechanical circulatory and end-organ support to manage the predominant ventricular failure, hemometabolic phenotypes, and shock severity associated with each etiology is discussed. Given the limited evidence-base in CS care, we also highlight potential knowledge gaps ripe for future exploration.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.