根据2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南,使用边界高压阈值诊断隐匿性高血压的诊断准确性

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sophie Walsh, Eunhee Choi, Chloe Fang, Keisuke Narita, Maria Cepeda, Brulinda Frangaj, Sofia Kim, Yaniris Mercado, Riley Nesheim-Case, Uriel Alvira Ramirez, Matthew Barrett, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo
{"title":"根据2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南,使用边界高压阈值诊断隐匿性高血压的诊断准确性","authors":"Sophie Walsh, Eunhee Choi, Chloe Fang, Keisuke Narita, Maria Cepeda, Brulinda Frangaj, Sofia Kim, Yaniris Mercado, Riley Nesheim-Case, Uriel Alvira Ramirez, Matthew Barrett, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5-10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1-0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"288-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Walsh, Eunhee Choi, Chloe Fang, Keisuke Narita, Maria Cepeda, Brulinda Frangaj, Sofia Kim, Yaniris Mercado, Riley Nesheim-Case, Uriel Alvira Ramirez, Matthew Barrett, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajh/hpaf017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5-10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1-0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"288-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)血压指南推荐,在未服用降压药且血压(即收缩压[SBP] 120)处于边界的成年人中,动态血压监测(ABPM)可用于诊断隐蔽性高血压。根据改善高血压检测研究的数据,敏感性(SN)、特异性(SP)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和检出边缘性办公室血压(即办公室血压120 ~ 10、5 ~ 10和0.2)的阳性和阴性的似然比分别被认为是强、中等和弱。结果:263例患者中,平均±SD年龄为39.2±12.8岁,62.4%为女性,38.4%为边缘性血压,26.2%为隐匿性高血压。SN、SP、PPV和NPV分别为0.754、0.747、0.515和0.895。阳性和阴性的似然比分别为2.984(弱)和0.330(弱)。结论:使用2017年ACC/AHA血压指南中推荐的边缘性血压阈值不足以排除隐蔽性高血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.

Background: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg).

Methods: Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5-10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1-0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively.

Results: Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively.

Conclusions: The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信