父母的声音在哪里?视频反馈育儿干预父母经验的综合研究

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ming Wai Wan, Tarendeep. K. Johal, Anja Wittkowski
{"title":"父母的声音在哪里?视频反馈育儿干预父母经验的综合研究","authors":"Ming Wai Wan, Tarendeep. K. Johal, Anja Wittkowski","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Video-aided feedback (VF) is a well-evidenced intervention technique to enhance the relationship between a parent and their young child. While parental acceptability is foundational to engagement and intervention efficacy, the parent’s perspective is only now emerging as a valued consideration when evaluating VF-based interventions. This systematic review metasynthesised qualitative research on the experiences of primary caregivers with a young child (primarily 0–30 months) of participating in a VF parenting intervention. A search of nine databases yielded 17 studies (10 published since 2020) involving parents who had participated in range of VF-focussed programmes. Thematic synthesis identified six themes: (1) Getting past the fear and discomfort: Being ‘good enough’ and ‘doing the right thing’; (2) The power of video: “I had never really noticed that before‟ (with two subthemes: video as validation and for seeing child behavioural intentionality; video as an agent for change); (3) The practitioner’s skill and role in creating a safe space; (4) The approach was too intangible, inflexible, positive, unclear; (5) When the intervention is over: Positive change and generalisation; (6) Parental engagement and involvement: Barriers and enhancements. While most parents reported experiencing a range of interpersonal and intrapersonal benefits from taking part in a VF parenting intervention, having to overcome initial strong negative and uncomfortable feelings were an important part of the journey. Some parents could not see the value of the approach or did not perceive the intervention to meet their needs. Insights into parental experience are complementary to outcome-based evaluations. However, biased design (e.g., only one study included intervention non-completers) and variable study quality need addressing in future studies. Implications for practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Is the Parent’s Voice? A Meta-Synthesis of Parental Experiences of Video Feedback Parenting Interventions\",\"authors\":\"Ming Wai Wan, Tarendeep. K. Johal, Anja Wittkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Video-aided feedback (VF) is a well-evidenced intervention technique to enhance the relationship between a parent and their young child. While parental acceptability is foundational to engagement and intervention efficacy, the parent’s perspective is only now emerging as a valued consideration when evaluating VF-based interventions. This systematic review metasynthesised qualitative research on the experiences of primary caregivers with a young child (primarily 0–30 months) of participating in a VF parenting intervention. A search of nine databases yielded 17 studies (10 published since 2020) involving parents who had participated in range of VF-focussed programmes. Thematic synthesis identified six themes: (1) Getting past the fear and discomfort: Being ‘good enough’ and ‘doing the right thing’; (2) The power of video: “I had never really noticed that before‟ (with two subthemes: video as validation and for seeing child behavioural intentionality; video as an agent for change); (3) The practitioner’s skill and role in creating a safe space; (4) The approach was too intangible, inflexible, positive, unclear; (5) When the intervention is over: Positive change and generalisation; (6) Parental engagement and involvement: Barriers and enhancements. While most parents reported experiencing a range of interpersonal and intrapersonal benefits from taking part in a VF parenting intervention, having to overcome initial strong negative and uncomfortable feelings were an important part of the journey. Some parents could not see the value of the approach or did not perceive the intervention to meet their needs. Insights into parental experience are complementary to outcome-based evaluations. However, biased design (e.g., only one study included intervention non-completers) and variable study quality need addressing in future studies. Implications for practice are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00514-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视频辅助反馈(VF)是一种得到充分证明的干预技术,可以增强父母与幼儿之间的关系。虽然父母的可接受性是参与和干预效果的基础,但在评估基于vf的干预措施时,父母的观点现在才成为一个有价值的考虑因素。本系统综述综合了对幼儿(主要是0-30个月)的主要照顾者参与VF育儿干预的经验的定性研究。对9个数据库的搜索得出了17项研究(自2020年以来发表的10项研究),涉及参加了一系列以vf为重点的项目的父母。主题综合确定了六个主题:(1)克服恐惧和不适:“足够好”和“做正确的事”;(2)视频的力量:“我以前从来没有真正注意到这一点”(有两个次要主题:视频作为验证和看到孩子的行为意向性;视频作为变革的推动者);(3)从业者在创造安全空间中的技能和角色;(4)方法过于无形、呆板、积极、不明确;(5)干预结束后:积极改变和推广;(6)父母参与与参与:障碍与增强。虽然大多数父母报告说,通过参加VF育儿干预,他们在人际关系和个人关系方面都有了一系列的好处,但克服最初强烈的负面和不舒服的感觉是这一过程的重要组成部分。一些家长看不到这种方法的价值,或者没有意识到这种干预措施能满足他们的需求。对父母经历的洞察是对基于结果的评估的补充。然而,偏倚的设计(例如,只有一项研究包括干预未完成者)和可变的研究质量需要在未来的研究中解决。讨论了对实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where Is the Parent’s Voice? A Meta-Synthesis of Parental Experiences of Video Feedback Parenting Interventions

Video-aided feedback (VF) is a well-evidenced intervention technique to enhance the relationship between a parent and their young child. While parental acceptability is foundational to engagement and intervention efficacy, the parent’s perspective is only now emerging as a valued consideration when evaluating VF-based interventions. This systematic review metasynthesised qualitative research on the experiences of primary caregivers with a young child (primarily 0–30 months) of participating in a VF parenting intervention. A search of nine databases yielded 17 studies (10 published since 2020) involving parents who had participated in range of VF-focussed programmes. Thematic synthesis identified six themes: (1) Getting past the fear and discomfort: Being ‘good enough’ and ‘doing the right thing’; (2) The power of video: “I had never really noticed that before‟ (with two subthemes: video as validation and for seeing child behavioural intentionality; video as an agent for change); (3) The practitioner’s skill and role in creating a safe space; (4) The approach was too intangible, inflexible, positive, unclear; (5) When the intervention is over: Positive change and generalisation; (6) Parental engagement and involvement: Barriers and enhancements. While most parents reported experiencing a range of interpersonal and intrapersonal benefits from taking part in a VF parenting intervention, having to overcome initial strong negative and uncomfortable feelings were an important part of the journey. Some parents could not see the value of the approach or did not perceive the intervention to meet their needs. Insights into parental experience are complementary to outcome-based evaluations. However, biased design (e.g., only one study included intervention non-completers) and variable study quality need addressing in future studies. Implications for practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信