双重感官缺失与认知障碍:一项针对加利西亚城市地区老年医学中心老年用户的研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000002223
Covadonga Vázquez-Sánchez, Luz M Gigirey Prieto, Carlos P Del Oro-Sáez
{"title":"双重感官缺失与认知障碍:一项针对加利西亚城市地区老年医学中心老年用户的研究。","authors":"Covadonga Vázquez-Sánchez, Luz M Gigirey Prieto, Carlos P Del Oro-Sáez","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Several studies indicate that dual sensory loss (DSL) is related to cognitive impairment. However, there are still no conclusive data on the role of each individual deficit on cognitive performance when both co-occur in the same person.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the possible association between sensory deficit and cognitive impairment in a sample of older adults and whether this association differs in subjects with DSL compared with those with single or no sensory impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants of this study were older adult users of gerontological centers in an urban area of Galicia (Spain). All subjects underwent visual and auditory screening tests to detect the presence of DSL. The Spanish version of the Mini-Mental State Examination test was used to identify cognitive impairment. Hearing loss was defined according to Ventry and Weinstein's criteria. Visual impairment was defined as a binocular presenting visual acuity <0.5 (20/40). The presence of DSL was established on the basis of the definitions of the single deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 534 subjects were examined. Older adults with DSL had the worst results in the Mini-Mental test, and those without sensory impairment had the best. The likelihood of cognitive impairment was greater in older adults with DSL than in those without sensory impairment (odds ratio, 6.06 [3.14 to 11.65]). When only visual impairment was present, the likelihood of cognitive impairment was 3.73 times higher (0.95 to 3.09) than that of subjects with no sensory impairment. Hearing loss alone seems not to be significantly associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight the importance of continuing research in DSL for the prevention of cognitive impairment, the design of intervention plans, and the optimization of health resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual sensory loss and cognitive impairment: A study in elderly users of gerontological centers in a Galician urban area.\",\"authors\":\"Covadonga Vázquez-Sánchez, Luz M Gigirey Prieto, Carlos P Del Oro-Sáez\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Several studies indicate that dual sensory loss (DSL) is related to cognitive impairment. However, there are still no conclusive data on the role of each individual deficit on cognitive performance when both co-occur in the same person.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the possible association between sensory deficit and cognitive impairment in a sample of older adults and whether this association differs in subjects with DSL compared with those with single or no sensory impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants of this study were older adult users of gerontological centers in an urban area of Galicia (Spain). All subjects underwent visual and auditory screening tests to detect the presence of DSL. The Spanish version of the Mini-Mental State Examination test was used to identify cognitive impairment. Hearing loss was defined according to Ventry and Weinstein's criteria. Visual impairment was defined as a binocular presenting visual acuity <0.5 (20/40). The presence of DSL was established on the basis of the definitions of the single deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 534 subjects were examined. Older adults with DSL had the worst results in the Mini-Mental test, and those without sensory impairment had the best. The likelihood of cognitive impairment was greater in older adults with DSL than in those without sensory impairment (odds ratio, 6.06 [3.14 to 11.65]). When only visual impairment was present, the likelihood of cognitive impairment was 3.73 times higher (0.95 to 3.09) than that of subjects with no sensory impairment. Hearing loss alone seems not to be significantly associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight the importance of continuing research in DSL for the prevention of cognitive impairment, the design of intervention plans, and the optimization of health resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"121-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optometry and Vision Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:多项研究表明,双重感觉丧失(DSL)与认知障碍有关。然而,当这两种缺陷同时发生在同一个人身上时,仍然没有确凿的数据表明每个个体的缺陷对认知表现的影响。目的:本研究旨在分析老年人感觉缺陷与认知障碍之间可能的联系,以及这种联系在DSL受试者中是否与单一或无感觉障碍的受试者不同。方法:本研究的参与者是加利西亚(西班牙)市区老年学中心的老年人。所有受试者都进行了视觉和听觉筛选测试,以检测DSL的存在。西班牙语版的迷你精神状态测试被用来识别认知障碍。听力损失是根据Ventry和Weinstein的标准定义的。视力障碍定义为双眼呈现视力。结果:共检查534例受试者。患有DSL的老年人在迷你智力测试中表现最差,而没有感觉障碍的老年人表现最好。患有DSL的老年人发生认知障碍的可能性大于无感觉障碍的老年人(优势比为6.06[3.14 ~ 11.65])。当仅存在视觉障碍时,认知障碍的可能性比无感觉障碍的受试者高3.73倍(0.95至3.09)。听力损失本身似乎与认知障碍的高风险无关。结论:本研究结果强调了继续研究DSL对预防认知障碍、设计干预计划和优化卫生资源的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual sensory loss and cognitive impairment: A study in elderly users of gerontological centers in a Galician urban area.

Significance: Several studies indicate that dual sensory loss (DSL) is related to cognitive impairment. However, there are still no conclusive data on the role of each individual deficit on cognitive performance when both co-occur in the same person.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the possible association between sensory deficit and cognitive impairment in a sample of older adults and whether this association differs in subjects with DSL compared with those with single or no sensory impairment.

Methods: Participants of this study were older adult users of gerontological centers in an urban area of Galicia (Spain). All subjects underwent visual and auditory screening tests to detect the presence of DSL. The Spanish version of the Mini-Mental State Examination test was used to identify cognitive impairment. Hearing loss was defined according to Ventry and Weinstein's criteria. Visual impairment was defined as a binocular presenting visual acuity <0.5 (20/40). The presence of DSL was established on the basis of the definitions of the single deficits.

Results: A total of 534 subjects were examined. Older adults with DSL had the worst results in the Mini-Mental test, and those without sensory impairment had the best. The likelihood of cognitive impairment was greater in older adults with DSL than in those without sensory impairment (odds ratio, 6.06 [3.14 to 11.65]). When only visual impairment was present, the likelihood of cognitive impairment was 3.73 times higher (0.95 to 3.09) than that of subjects with no sensory impairment. Hearing loss alone seems not to be significantly associated with a higher risk of cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight the importance of continuing research in DSL for the prevention of cognitive impairment, the design of intervention plans, and the optimization of health resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信