Albert M Isaacs, Chevis N Shannon, Samuel R Browd, Jason S Hauptman, Richard Holubkov, Hailey Jensen, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Patrick J McDonald, Michael M McDowell, Robert P Naftel, Nichol Nunn, Jonathan Pindrik, Ian F Pollack, Ron Reeder, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Jennifer M Strahle, Mandeep S Tamber, William E Whitehead, John R W Kestle, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons
{"title":"永久性和暂时性脑脊液分流治疗出血性脑积水的神经发育结果:脑积水临床研究网络研究。","authors":"Albert M Isaacs, Chevis N Shannon, Samuel R Browd, Jason S Hauptman, Richard Holubkov, Hailey Jensen, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Patrick J McDonald, Michael M McDowell, Robert P Naftel, Nichol Nunn, Jonathan Pindrik, Ian F Pollack, Ron Reeder, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Jennifer M Strahle, Mandeep S Tamber, William E Whitehead, John R W Kestle, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.PEDS24257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), focusing on the comparative effectiveness of temporary and permanent CSF diversion strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective observational cohort study (2012-2021) involved preterm infants diagnosed with PHH who underwent either initial permanent or temporary CSF diversion. Patients were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III), at 15-30 months and, when possible, at 36-42 months of corrected age. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable regression models to examine the associations between BSID-III scores and various treatment and patient factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 106 patients, 15 (14%) underwent initial permanent CSF diversion, while 91 (86%) received temporary diversion. Patients who underwent permanent diversion had lower cognitive scores (58.2 ± 5.7) compared to those temporized (69.0 ± 15.9) (p = 0.01). Temporized patients who later required conversion to permanent diversion demonstrated poorer composite (66.6 ± 18.0 vs 79.9 ± 18.8, p = 0.02), expressive (4.6 ± 3.2 vs 7.0 ± 3.7, p = 0.03), and receptive (4.2 ± 3.3 vs 6.1 ± 3.0, p = 0.04) language scores compared to those weaned from temporary CSF diversion. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients temporized with a ventriculosubgaleal shunt versus a ventricular reservoir. Ventricle size at the time of initial CSF diversion was not associated with BSID-III scores. However, univariable analysis showed that a larger ventricle size at the time of conversion to permanent diversion was associated with lower neurodevelopmental scores across all domains. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade, complex chronic conditions, and postmenstrual age, revealed that larger ventricle size at the time of conversion correlated negatively with composite motor (effect size -0.47, CI -0.82 to -0.11, p = 0.01) and fine motor (-0.08, CI -0.15 to -0.01, p = 0.03) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the choice between permanent and temporary CSF diversion as initial treatments may affect neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with PHH, which are influenced by IVH severity and timing of intervention. The findings support early temporization and avoiding delays to optimize permanent shunting. Monitoring ventricular size closely during this phase is critical, as larger ventricular size at the time of conversion is associated with poorer outcomes. These results highlight the necessity for adapting treatment strategies on the basis of individual patient characteristics, responses, and progress in managing PHH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"315-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurodevelopmental outcomes of permanent and temporary CSF diversion in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.\",\"authors\":\"Albert M Isaacs, Chevis N Shannon, Samuel R Browd, Jason S Hauptman, Richard Holubkov, Hailey Jensen, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Patrick J McDonald, Michael M McDowell, Robert P Naftel, Nichol Nunn, Jonathan Pindrik, Ian F Pollack, Ron Reeder, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Curtis J Rozzelle, Brandon G Rocque, Jennifer M Strahle, Mandeep S Tamber, William E Whitehead, John R W Kestle, David D Limbrick, John C Wellons\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.10.PEDS24257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), focusing on the comparative effectiveness of temporary and permanent CSF diversion strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter prospective observational cohort study (2012-2021) involved preterm infants diagnosed with PHH who underwent either initial permanent or temporary CSF diversion. Patients were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III), at 15-30 months and, when possible, at 36-42 months of corrected age. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable regression models to examine the associations between BSID-III scores and various treatment and patient factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 106 patients, 15 (14%) underwent initial permanent CSF diversion, while 91 (86%) received temporary diversion. Patients who underwent permanent diversion had lower cognitive scores (58.2 ± 5.7) compared to those temporized (69.0 ± 15.9) (p = 0.01). Temporized patients who later required conversion to permanent diversion demonstrated poorer composite (66.6 ± 18.0 vs 79.9 ± 18.8, p = 0.02), expressive (4.6 ± 3.2 vs 7.0 ± 3.7, p = 0.03), and receptive (4.2 ± 3.3 vs 6.1 ± 3.0, p = 0.04) language scores compared to those weaned from temporary CSF diversion. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients temporized with a ventriculosubgaleal shunt versus a ventricular reservoir. Ventricle size at the time of initial CSF diversion was not associated with BSID-III scores. However, univariable analysis showed that a larger ventricle size at the time of conversion to permanent diversion was associated with lower neurodevelopmental scores across all domains. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade, complex chronic conditions, and postmenstrual age, revealed that larger ventricle size at the time of conversion correlated negatively with composite motor (effect size -0.47, CI -0.82 to -0.11, p = 0.01) and fine motor (-0.08, CI -0.15 to -0.01, p = 0.03) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the choice between permanent and temporary CSF diversion as initial treatments may affect neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with PHH, which are influenced by IVH severity and timing of intervention. The findings support early temporization and avoiding delays to optimize permanent shunting. Monitoring ventricular size closely during this phase is critical, as larger ventricular size at the time of conversion is associated with poorer outcomes. These results highlight the necessity for adapting treatment strategies on the basis of individual patient characteristics, responses, and progress in managing PHH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"315-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.PEDS24257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.PEDS24257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨了出血性脑积水(PHH)早产儿的神经发育结局,重点研究了暂时性和永久性脑脊液分流策略的比较效果。方法:这项多中心前瞻性观察队列研究(2012-2021)纳入了诊断为PHH的早产儿,他们接受了初始永久性或暂时性脑脊液分流。使用Bayley婴幼儿发育量表第三版(BSID-III)对患者在15-30个月时进行评估,如果可能的话,在矫正年龄36-42个月时进行评估。统计分析包括单变量和多变量回归模型,以检验BSID-III评分与各种治疗和患者因素之间的关系。结果:106例患者中,15例(14%)接受了初始永久性脑脊液分流,91例(86%)接受了暂时性脑脊液分流。永久性改道组患者的认知评分(58.2±5.7)低于暂时性改道组(69.0±15.9)(p = 0.01)。暂时转移到永久转移的患者表现出较差的综合语言评分(66.6±18.0 vs 79.9±18.8,p = 0.02),表达性(4.6±3.2 vs 7.0±3.7,p = 0.03)和接受性(4.2±3.3 vs 6.1±3.0,p = 0.04)与暂时转移的患者相比。在脑室- galeal下分流术和脑室贮液术的患者中,没有观察到结果的显著差异。初始脑脊液分流时的脑室大小与BSID-III评分无关。然而,单变量分析显示,在转换为永久性转移时,较大的心室大小与所有领域的较低神经发育评分相关。多因素分析,调整脑室内出血(IVH)分级、复杂慢性疾病和经后年龄,显示转换时较大的脑室大小与复合运动(效应值-0.47,CI -0.82至-0.11,p = 0.01)和精细运动(-0.08,CI -0.15至-0.01,p = 0.03)评分呈负相关。结论:本研究提示,选择永久性和暂时性脑脊液分流作为初始治疗可能会影响PHH早产儿的神经发育结局,这受IVH严重程度和干预时间的影响。研究结果支持早期的时间安排和避免延误,以优化永久分流。在这一阶段密切监测心室大小是至关重要的,因为转换时心室大小越大,预后越差。这些结果强调了在个体患者特征、反应和管理PHH进展的基础上调整治疗策略的必要性。
Neurodevelopmental outcomes of permanent and temporary CSF diversion in posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.
Objective: This study investigated neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), focusing on the comparative effectiveness of temporary and permanent CSF diversion strategies.
Methods: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study (2012-2021) involved preterm infants diagnosed with PHH who underwent either initial permanent or temporary CSF diversion. Patients were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III), at 15-30 months and, when possible, at 36-42 months of corrected age. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable regression models to examine the associations between BSID-III scores and various treatment and patient factors.
Results: Among 106 patients, 15 (14%) underwent initial permanent CSF diversion, while 91 (86%) received temporary diversion. Patients who underwent permanent diversion had lower cognitive scores (58.2 ± 5.7) compared to those temporized (69.0 ± 15.9) (p = 0.01). Temporized patients who later required conversion to permanent diversion demonstrated poorer composite (66.6 ± 18.0 vs 79.9 ± 18.8, p = 0.02), expressive (4.6 ± 3.2 vs 7.0 ± 3.7, p = 0.03), and receptive (4.2 ± 3.3 vs 6.1 ± 3.0, p = 0.04) language scores compared to those weaned from temporary CSF diversion. No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients temporized with a ventriculosubgaleal shunt versus a ventricular reservoir. Ventricle size at the time of initial CSF diversion was not associated with BSID-III scores. However, univariable analysis showed that a larger ventricle size at the time of conversion to permanent diversion was associated with lower neurodevelopmental scores across all domains. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade, complex chronic conditions, and postmenstrual age, revealed that larger ventricle size at the time of conversion correlated negatively with composite motor (effect size -0.47, CI -0.82 to -0.11, p = 0.01) and fine motor (-0.08, CI -0.15 to -0.01, p = 0.03) scores.
Conclusions: This study suggested that the choice between permanent and temporary CSF diversion as initial treatments may affect neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm neonates with PHH, which are influenced by IVH severity and timing of intervention. The findings support early temporization and avoiding delays to optimize permanent shunting. Monitoring ventricular size closely during this phase is critical, as larger ventricular size at the time of conversion is associated with poorer outcomes. These results highlight the necessity for adapting treatment strategies on the basis of individual patient characteristics, responses, and progress in managing PHH.