当前直接力学测试方法在评估术中未控制的高血压引起的主动脉瘤样本中的潜力。

Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.17691/stm2024.16.4.05
V N Nikolenko, Y V Belov, M V Oganesyan, Y M Efremov, N A Rizaeva, A D Vovkogon, A V Sankov, L A Gridin, P S Timashev, K V Bulygin, M V Sankova
{"title":"当前直接力学测试方法在评估术中未控制的高血压引起的主动脉瘤样本中的潜力。","authors":"V N Nikolenko, Y V Belov, M V Oganesyan, Y M Efremov, N A Rizaeva, A D Vovkogon, A V Sankov, L A Gridin, P S Timashev, K V Bulygin, M V Sankova","doi":"10.17691/stm2024.16.4.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to investigate the potential of direct mechanical testing methods in clinical practice to assess the strength and elastic-deformative characteristics of intraoperative samples of aortic arch aneurysm caused by uncontrolled arterial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study experimental material was the resected parts of the aortic aneurysm obtained during aneurysm replacement surgery in a patient with uncontrolled arterial hypertension. The direct mechanical testing methods such as instrumental indentation and uniaxial extension were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was shown that by the direct instrumental indentation it is possible to accurately assess and compare the stiffness of all three layers of the aortic wall. In this clinical case, the inner aorta layer was subject to the greatest atherosclerotic damage. In the media area, the values of this indicator were widely scattered, whereas the material was greatly dissected. By uniaxial extension method it is possible to obtain accurate parameters of the vascular wall strength, as well as to assess the stiffness, elasticity, and deformability of the intraoperatively resected aortic tissue. It was found that the aneurysm aortic wall, compared with the non-dilated aortic section, was characterized by a significantly lower strength in both longitudinal (by 4.25 times) and transverse (by 3.75 times) directions. In addition, aneurysm tissues demonstrated a significantly lower elasticity and deformability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated the perspectives and options of using in clinical practice current methods of direct mechanical testing, which makes it possible to obtain more accurate indicators of the strength and elastic-deformative vascular characteristics, to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular accidents, and to justify the need for regular monitoring of vascular wall stiffness in clinical practice, in particular in patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":520289,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine","volume":"16 4","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential of Current Direct Mechanical Testing Methods in Assessing Intraoperative Samples of Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"V N Nikolenko, Y V Belov, M V Oganesyan, Y M Efremov, N A Rizaeva, A D Vovkogon, A V Sankov, L A Gridin, P S Timashev, K V Bulygin, M V Sankova\",\"doi\":\"10.17691/stm2024.16.4.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>The aim of the study</b> was to investigate the potential of direct mechanical testing methods in clinical practice to assess the strength and elastic-deformative characteristics of intraoperative samples of aortic arch aneurysm caused by uncontrolled arterial hypertension.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study experimental material was the resected parts of the aortic aneurysm obtained during aneurysm replacement surgery in a patient with uncontrolled arterial hypertension. The direct mechanical testing methods such as instrumental indentation and uniaxial extension were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was shown that by the direct instrumental indentation it is possible to accurately assess and compare the stiffness of all three layers of the aortic wall. In this clinical case, the inner aorta layer was subject to the greatest atherosclerotic damage. In the media area, the values of this indicator were widely scattered, whereas the material was greatly dissected. By uniaxial extension method it is possible to obtain accurate parameters of the vascular wall strength, as well as to assess the stiffness, elasticity, and deformability of the intraoperatively resected aortic tissue. It was found that the aneurysm aortic wall, compared with the non-dilated aortic section, was characterized by a significantly lower strength in both longitudinal (by 4.25 times) and transverse (by 3.75 times) directions. In addition, aneurysm tissues demonstrated a significantly lower elasticity and deformability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated the perspectives and options of using in clinical practice current methods of direct mechanical testing, which makes it possible to obtain more accurate indicators of the strength and elastic-deformative vascular characteristics, to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular accidents, and to justify the need for regular monitoring of vascular wall stiffness in clinical practice, in particular in patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"46-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2024.16.4.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2024.16.4.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨直接力学测试方法在临床实践中的潜力,以评估术中由未控制的动脉高血压引起的主动脉弓动脉瘤样本的强度和弹性变形特征。材料与方法:本研究实验材料为一例动脉性高血压未控制的患者在动脉瘤置换手术中切除的主动脉瘤部分。采用仪器压痕和单轴拉伸等直接力学测试方法。结果:通过直接仪器压痕,可以准确地评估和比较主动脉壁所有三层的刚度。在这个临床病例中,内主动脉层受到最大的动脉粥样硬化损伤。在介质区,该指标的数值分布广泛,而材料则被大量解剖。通过单轴拉伸法,可以获得准确的血管壁强度参数,并评估术中切除主动脉组织的刚度、弹性和可变形性。结果发现,与未扩张的主动脉段相比,动脉瘤主壁在纵向(减小4.25倍)和横向(减小3.75倍)上强度均明显降低。此外,动脉瘤组织的弹性和可变形性明显降低。结论:该研究展示了在临床实践中使用当前直接力学测试方法的观点和选择,它可以获得更准确的血管强度和弹性变形特征指标,阐明心血管事故的病理生理机制,并证明在临床实践中定期监测血管壁刚度的必要性,特别是在动脉性高血压不受控制的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Potential of Current Direct Mechanical Testing Methods in Assessing Intraoperative Samples of Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension.

Potential of Current Direct Mechanical Testing Methods in Assessing Intraoperative Samples of Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension.

Potential of Current Direct Mechanical Testing Methods in Assessing Intraoperative Samples of Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension.

Potential of Current Direct Mechanical Testing Methods in Assessing Intraoperative Samples of Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension.

The aim of the study was to investigate the potential of direct mechanical testing methods in clinical practice to assess the strength and elastic-deformative characteristics of intraoperative samples of aortic arch aneurysm caused by uncontrolled arterial hypertension.

Materials and methods: The study experimental material was the resected parts of the aortic aneurysm obtained during aneurysm replacement surgery in a patient with uncontrolled arterial hypertension. The direct mechanical testing methods such as instrumental indentation and uniaxial extension were used.

Results: It was shown that by the direct instrumental indentation it is possible to accurately assess and compare the stiffness of all three layers of the aortic wall. In this clinical case, the inner aorta layer was subject to the greatest atherosclerotic damage. In the media area, the values of this indicator were widely scattered, whereas the material was greatly dissected. By uniaxial extension method it is possible to obtain accurate parameters of the vascular wall strength, as well as to assess the stiffness, elasticity, and deformability of the intraoperatively resected aortic tissue. It was found that the aneurysm aortic wall, compared with the non-dilated aortic section, was characterized by a significantly lower strength in both longitudinal (by 4.25 times) and transverse (by 3.75 times) directions. In addition, aneurysm tissues demonstrated a significantly lower elasticity and deformability.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated the perspectives and options of using in clinical practice current methods of direct mechanical testing, which makes it possible to obtain more accurate indicators of the strength and elastic-deformative vascular characteristics, to clarify the pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular accidents, and to justify the need for regular monitoring of vascular wall stiffness in clinical practice, in particular in patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信