在一个恐同的国家中死亡:解决医疗保健差距,提前护理计划和替代决策挑战的性和性别少数老年人临终。

Heather Menzer
{"title":"在一个恐同的国家中死亡:解决医疗保健差距,提前护理计划和替代决策挑战的性和性别少数老年人临终。","authors":"Heather Menzer","doi":"10.1177/10499091251317724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Promoting autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential part of palliative care. Therefore, palliative care providers should prioritize supporting the autonomy of sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, a community that has historically suffered from healthcare disparities. This support is particularly significant when an illness or injury renders a patient unable to make medical decisions, necessitating the designation of a surrogate decision-maker. Surrogate decision-maker policies vary by state and largely do not represent patients whose support systems are outside of the biological family. This article reviews healthcare disparities experienced by SGM older adults, including higher rates of certain health conditions and barriers to accessing care due to stigma and discrimination. It also highlights the compounded challenges faced by SGM individuals who are part of racial and ethnic minority groups. The lack of inclusive surrogate decision-making policies exacerbates these disparities, as many SGM older adults do not have legally recognized partners or children to act as decision-makers. The absence of inclusive policies for surrogate decision-making results in distress for patients, families, loved ones, and medical providers. This article discusses the importance of advance care planning and completion of advance directives for this population to ensure patient wishes are respected. Palliative providers need to advocate for surrogate decision-maker policies that are more inclusive of families of choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251317724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dying in a Homophobic Nation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities, Advance Care Planning and Surrogate Decision-Making Challenges for Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults at End-of-Life.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Menzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091251317724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Promoting autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential part of palliative care. Therefore, palliative care providers should prioritize supporting the autonomy of sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, a community that has historically suffered from healthcare disparities. This support is particularly significant when an illness or injury renders a patient unable to make medical decisions, necessitating the designation of a surrogate decision-maker. Surrogate decision-maker policies vary by state and largely do not represent patients whose support systems are outside of the biological family. This article reviews healthcare disparities experienced by SGM older adults, including higher rates of certain health conditions and barriers to accessing care due to stigma and discrimination. It also highlights the compounded challenges faced by SGM individuals who are part of racial and ethnic minority groups. The lack of inclusive surrogate decision-making policies exacerbates these disparities, as many SGM older adults do not have legally recognized partners or children to act as decision-makers. The absence of inclusive policies for surrogate decision-making results in distress for patients, families, loved ones, and medical providers. This article discusses the importance of advance care planning and completion of advance directives for this population to ensure patient wishes are respected. Palliative providers need to advocate for surrogate decision-maker policies that are more inclusive of families of choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10499091251317724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251317724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251317724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促进自主医疗决策是姑息治疗的重要组成部分。因此,姑息治疗提供者应优先支持性和性别少数群体(SGM)老年人的自主权,这是一个历史上遭受医疗保健差距的社区。当疾病或受伤使病人无法作出医疗决定,需要指定一名替代决策者时,这种支持尤为重要。代理决策者的政策因州而异,很大程度上不代表那些支持系统不在亲生家庭的患者。本文回顾了SGM老年人所经历的医疗保健差异,包括某些健康状况的较高比率以及由于耻辱和歧视而无法获得护理的障碍。它还突出了作为种族和少数民族群体一部分的SGM个体所面临的复杂挑战。缺乏包容性的替代决策政策加剧了这些差异,因为许多SGM老年人没有法律认可的伴侣或子女作为决策者。缺乏包容性的替代决策政策导致患者、家属、亲人和医疗服务提供者的痛苦。这篇文章讨论了预先护理计划和完成预先指示的重要性,以确保患者的愿望得到尊重。姑息治疗提供者需要倡导更包容家庭选择的替代决策者政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dying in a Homophobic Nation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities, Advance Care Planning and Surrogate Decision-Making Challenges for Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults at End-of-Life.

Promoting autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential part of palliative care. Therefore, palliative care providers should prioritize supporting the autonomy of sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, a community that has historically suffered from healthcare disparities. This support is particularly significant when an illness or injury renders a patient unable to make medical decisions, necessitating the designation of a surrogate decision-maker. Surrogate decision-maker policies vary by state and largely do not represent patients whose support systems are outside of the biological family. This article reviews healthcare disparities experienced by SGM older adults, including higher rates of certain health conditions and barriers to accessing care due to stigma and discrimination. It also highlights the compounded challenges faced by SGM individuals who are part of racial and ethnic minority groups. The lack of inclusive surrogate decision-making policies exacerbates these disparities, as many SGM older adults do not have legally recognized partners or children to act as decision-makers. The absence of inclusive policies for surrogate decision-making results in distress for patients, families, loved ones, and medical providers. This article discusses the importance of advance care planning and completion of advance directives for this population to ensure patient wishes are respected. Palliative providers need to advocate for surrogate decision-maker policies that are more inclusive of families of choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信