不同的沉浸式环境如何影响皮质内脑机接口。

Ariana F Tortolani, Nicolas G Kunigk, Anton R Sobinov, Michael L Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Jennifer L Collinger, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, John E Downey
{"title":"不同的沉浸式环境如何影响皮质内脑机接口。","authors":"Ariana F Tortolani, Nicolas G Kunigk, Anton R Sobinov, Michael L Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Jennifer L Collinger, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, John E Downey","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/adb078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. As brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device.<i>Approach</i>. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor.<i>Main results</i>. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered.<i>Significance</i>. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.Clinical Trial: NCT01894802.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Ariana F Tortolani, Nicolas G Kunigk, Anton R Sobinov, Michael L Boninger, Sliman J Bensmaia, Jennifer L Collinger, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, John E Downey\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/adb078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. As brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device.<i>Approach</i>. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor.<i>Main results</i>. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered.<i>Significance</i>. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.Clinical Trial: NCT01894802.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adb078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adb078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着脑机接口(BCI)研究的不断深入,开发出许多新的应用领域。任务可以在不同的虚拟环境中执行,BCI用户能否无缝切换环境将影响临床设备的最终效用。方法:在这里,我们研究了用于训练BCI解码器的虚拟环境的沉浸感的重要性,以及它在不同环境之间的通用性。两名参与者在他们的中央前回植入了皮质内电极,他们使用脑机接口来控制虚拟手臂,两人都通过虚拟现实护目镜沉浸式地观看,并在远处通过平板电视显示器观看。主要结果:每个参与者在研究之前使用最多的环境中训练和测试了解码器,每个环境类型一个解码器,每个参与者都表现得更好。对期望运动的神经调节受环境沉浸性的影响最小。最后,在对其中一名参与者的进一步测试中,我们发现在一种环境中训练的解码器可以很好地推广到另一种环境,但在会话中体验环境的顺序很重要。意义:总体而言,对环境的体验比环境的沉浸感对绩效的影响更大,但在考虑了体验后,BCI绩效得到了很好的推广。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces.

Objective. As brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device.Approach. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor.Main results. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered.Significance. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.Clinical Trial: NCT01894802.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信