联合反向冲击指数和简化运动评分作为创伤预后的有力鉴别指标。

IF 4.3
Annals of medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205
Meng-Yu Wu, Giou-Teng Yiang, Ding-Kuo Chien, Sy-Jou Chen, Chi-Ming Chu, Jui-Yuan Chung, Hon-Ping Ma, Mau-Roung Lin
{"title":"联合反向冲击指数和简化运动评分作为创伤预后的有力鉴别指标。","authors":"Meng-Yu Wu, Giou-Teng Yiang, Ding-Kuo Chien, Sy-Jou Chen, Chi-Ming Chu, Jui-Yuan Chung, Hon-Ping Ma, Mau-Roung Lin","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score (rSI-sMS) is a novel and rapid measure for assessing injury severity in patients with trauma in prehospital settings; however, its discriminant ability requires further validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from trauma database of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital to compare the accuracy of the rSI-sMS with that of the shock index, modified shock index, reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSI-GCS), and the reverse shock index multiplied by GCS motor subscale (rSI-GCSM) for discriminating in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, prolonged ICU stays ≥14 days, and prolonged hospital stays ≥30 days in patients with trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,760 patients from the trauma database were included. rSI-sMS had significantly better accuracy in discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stays (≥14 days), and prolonged hospital stays (≥30 days) than the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, whereas its accuracy was similar to that of the rSI-GCS. Furthermore, rSI-sMS had better accuracy for discriminating clinical outcomes in patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥16, motor vehicle collisions, falls, no chronic disease, and cardiovascular disease as well as in geriatric and nongeriatric patients. In patients with mixed and isolated brain injuries, rSI-sMS accurately discriminated the four clinical outcomes, similar to rSI-GCS. The optimal cutoff value of rSI-sMS had a discriminant ability of 85.0, 78.6, 75.2, and 81.0% for in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, ICU stay ≥14 days, and hospital stays of ≥30 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, rSI-sMS is a more accurate field triage scoring system for discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stay, and prolonged hospital stays in patients with trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"2458205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Meng-Yu Wu, Giou-Teng Yiang, Ding-Kuo Chien, Sy-Jou Chen, Chi-Ming Chu, Jui-Yuan Chung, Hon-Ping Ma, Mau-Roung Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score (rSI-sMS) is a novel and rapid measure for assessing injury severity in patients with trauma in prehospital settings; however, its discriminant ability requires further validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted from trauma database of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital to compare the accuracy of the rSI-sMS with that of the shock index, modified shock index, reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSI-GCS), and the reverse shock index multiplied by GCS motor subscale (rSI-GCSM) for discriminating in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, prolonged ICU stays ≥14 days, and prolonged hospital stays ≥30 days in patients with trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,760 patients from the trauma database were included. rSI-sMS had significantly better accuracy in discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stays (≥14 days), and prolonged hospital stays (≥30 days) than the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, whereas its accuracy was similar to that of the rSI-GCS. Furthermore, rSI-sMS had better accuracy for discriminating clinical outcomes in patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥16, motor vehicle collisions, falls, no chronic disease, and cardiovascular disease as well as in geriatric and nongeriatric patients. In patients with mixed and isolated brain injuries, rSI-sMS accurately discriminated the four clinical outcomes, similar to rSI-GCS. The optimal cutoff value of rSI-sMS had a discriminant ability of 85.0, 78.6, 75.2, and 81.0% for in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, ICU stay ≥14 days, and hospital stays of ≥30 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, rSI-sMS is a more accurate field triage scoring system for discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stay, and prolonged hospital stays in patients with trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"2458205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784069/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反向休克指数乘以简化运动评分(rSI-sMS)是评估院前创伤患者损伤严重程度的一种新颖而快速的方法;但其判别能力有待进一步验证。方法:本研究以台北慈济医院创伤资料库为资料来源,进行回顾性队列研究,比较rSI-sMS与休克指数、修正休克指数、反休克指数乘格拉斯哥昏迷量表(rSI-GCS)、反休克指数乘格拉斯哥昏迷量表运动量表(rSI-GCSM)在判别创伤患者住院死亡率、重症监护室(ICU)入院率、ICU延长住院日≥14天、延长住院日≥30天的准确性。结果:共纳入创伤数据库11,760例患者。rSI-sMS在区分住院死亡率、ICU入院率、延长ICU住院时间(≥14天)和延长住院时间(≥30天)方面的准确性显著高于休克指数、修正休克指数和rSI-GCSM,其准确性与rSI-GCS相似。此外,rSI-sMS在区分损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥16、机动车碰撞、跌倒、无慢性疾病和心血管疾病以及老年和非老年患者的临床结果方面具有更好的准确性。在混合性和孤立性脑损伤患者中,rSI-sMS与rSI-GCS相似,能够准确地区分四种临床结果。rSI-sMS的最佳截断值对住院死亡率、ICU入院率、ICU住院≥14天和住院≥30天的判别能力分别为85.0、78.6、75.2和81.0%。结论:与休克指数、修正休克指数和rSI-GCSM相比,rSI-sMS是一种更准确的区分创伤患者住院死亡率、ICU入院率、延长ICU住院时间和延长住院时间的现场分诊评分系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.

Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.

Background: The reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score (rSI-sMS) is a novel and rapid measure for assessing injury severity in patients with trauma in prehospital settings; however, its discriminant ability requires further validation.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from trauma database of Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital to compare the accuracy of the rSI-sMS with that of the shock index, modified shock index, reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (rSI-GCS), and the reverse shock index multiplied by GCS motor subscale (rSI-GCSM) for discriminating in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, prolonged ICU stays ≥14 days, and prolonged hospital stays ≥30 days in patients with trauma.

Results: A total of 11,760 patients from the trauma database were included. rSI-sMS had significantly better accuracy in discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stays (≥14 days), and prolonged hospital stays (≥30 days) than the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, whereas its accuracy was similar to that of the rSI-GCS. Furthermore, rSI-sMS had better accuracy for discriminating clinical outcomes in patients with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥16, motor vehicle collisions, falls, no chronic disease, and cardiovascular disease as well as in geriatric and nongeriatric patients. In patients with mixed and isolated brain injuries, rSI-sMS accurately discriminated the four clinical outcomes, similar to rSI-GCS. The optimal cutoff value of rSI-sMS had a discriminant ability of 85.0, 78.6, 75.2, and 81.0% for in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, ICU stay ≥14 days, and hospital stays of ≥30 days, respectively.

Conclusions: Compared with the shock index, modified shock index, and rSI-GCSM, rSI-sMS is a more accurate field triage scoring system for discriminating in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, prolonged ICU stay, and prolonged hospital stays in patients with trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信