基于血流动力学表型、毛细血管再充血时间靶向复苏早期脓毒性休克的统计分析方案:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2随机临床试验

Critical care science Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20250140
Nicolas Orozco, Gustavo García-Gallardo, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Jan Bakker, Sebastián Morales, Karla Ramos, Leyla Alegria, Jean Louis Teboul, Daniel De Backer, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Liliana Vallecilla Fernandez, Lucas Martins de Lima, Lucas Petri Damiani, Erica Ribeiro Sady, Eliana Vieira Santucci, Glenn Hernandez, Eduardo Kattan
{"title":"基于血流动力学表型、毛细血管再充血时间靶向复苏早期脓毒性休克的统计分析方案:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2随机临床试验","authors":"Nicolas Orozco, Gustavo García-Gallardo, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Jan Bakker, Sebastián Morales, Karla Ramos, Leyla Alegria, Jean Louis Teboul, Daniel De Backer, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Liliana Vallecilla Fernandez, Lucas Martins de Lima, Lucas Petri Damiani, Erica Ribeiro Sady, Eliana Vieira Santucci, Glenn Hernandez, Eduardo Kattan","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20250140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2 is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock to standard care resuscitation to test the hypothesis that the former is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in terms of hierarchal analysis of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the statistical plan for the ANDROMEDA--SHOCK 2 randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We briefly describe the trial design, patients, methods of randomization, interventions, outcomes, and sample size. We portray our planned statistical analysis for the hierarchical primary outcome using the stratified win ratio method, as well as the planned analysis for the secondary and tertiary outcomes. We also describe the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Finally, we provide details for presenting our results, including mock tables, baseline characteristics, and the effects of treatments on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to best trial practices, we report our statistical analysis plan and data management plan prior to locking the database and initiating the analyses. We anticipate that this practice will prevent analysis bias and improve the utility of the study's reported results.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"37 ","pages":"e20250140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical analysis plan for hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Orozco, Gustavo García-Gallardo, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Tiago Mendonça Dos Santos, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Jan Bakker, Sebastián Morales, Karla Ramos, Leyla Alegria, Jean Louis Teboul, Daniel De Backer, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Liliana Vallecilla Fernandez, Lucas Martins de Lima, Lucas Petri Damiani, Erica Ribeiro Sady, Eliana Vieira Santucci, Glenn Hernandez, Eduardo Kattan\",\"doi\":\"10.62675/2965-2774.20250140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2 is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock to standard care resuscitation to test the hypothesis that the former is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in terms of hierarchal analysis of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To report the statistical plan for the ANDROMEDA--SHOCK 2 randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We briefly describe the trial design, patients, methods of randomization, interventions, outcomes, and sample size. We portray our planned statistical analysis for the hierarchical primary outcome using the stratified win ratio method, as well as the planned analysis for the secondary and tertiary outcomes. We also describe the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Finally, we provide details for presenting our results, including mock tables, baseline characteristics, and the effects of treatments on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to best trial practices, we report our statistical analysis plan and data management plan prior to locking the database and initiating the analyses. We anticipate that this practice will prevent analysis bias and improve the utility of the study's reported results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"e20250140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20250140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2是一项国际、多中心、随机对照试验,比较基于血流动力学表型、毛细血管再填充时间的早期脓毒性休克复苏与标准护理复苏,从结果的层次分析角度检验前者与较低发病率和死亡率相关的假设。目的:报道ANDROMEDA- SHOCK 2随机临床试验的统计计划。方法:我们简要描述了试验设计、患者、随机化方法、干预措施、结果和样本量。我们使用分层胜率法描述了我们对分层主要结果的计划统计分析,以及对二级和三级结果的计划分析。我们还描述了亚组和敏感性分析。最后,我们详细介绍了我们的结果,包括模拟表、基线特征和治疗对结果的影响。结论:根据最佳试验实践,我们在锁定数据库并开始分析之前报告我们的统计分析计划和数据管理计划。我们预计这种做法将防止分析偏差,并提高研究报告结果的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical analysis plan for hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 randomized clinical trial.

Background: ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2 is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock to standard care resuscitation to test the hypothesis that the former is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in terms of hierarchal analysis of outcomes.

Objective: To report the statistical plan for the ANDROMEDA--SHOCK 2 randomized clinical trial.

Methods: We briefly describe the trial design, patients, methods of randomization, interventions, outcomes, and sample size. We portray our planned statistical analysis for the hierarchical primary outcome using the stratified win ratio method, as well as the planned analysis for the secondary and tertiary outcomes. We also describe the subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Finally, we provide details for presenting our results, including mock tables, baseline characteristics, and the effects of treatments on outcomes.

Conclusion: According to best trial practices, we report our statistical analysis plan and data management plan prior to locking the database and initiating the analyses. We anticipate that this practice will prevent analysis bias and improve the utility of the study's reported results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信