“你会吃药吗?”:创伤性脑损伤患者对改善社会功能的药物治疗的态度。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Impairment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1071/IB24051
Sandra Reeder, Katherine Sewell, Natasha A Lannin, Madeleine J Smith, Bridgette D Semple
{"title":"“你会吃药吗?”:创伤性脑损伤患者对改善社会功能的药物治疗的态度。","authors":"Sandra Reeder, Katherine Sewell, Natasha A Lannin, Madeleine J Smith, Bridgette D Semple","doi":"10.1071/IB24051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Many people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) report problems with social functioning that can have immediate and enduring impacts. We aimed to explore perceptions of social functioning after TBI and understand attitudes towards medication that could improve long-term social outcomes. Method A qualitative descriptive approach using interview methods was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Using purposive sampling we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with people with moderate to severe TBI between July and September 2021. Results Using a framework approach, we thematically identified three themes: (1) impacts of TBI on social roles and activities, including changes in recreational activities and role changes in family units; (2) change in social networks, resulting from shifts in attitudes to social activities and mental health issues; and (3) openness to novel treatments to improve social functioning - willingness to take potential medication to improve social functioning and the factors that have an impact on decision making. Conclusion Our results highlight that people with TBI experience a range of changes in social participation post-TBI, and that they have a strong interest in improving their social functioning. Such insights provide opportunities to tailor patient-centric treatments and circumnavigate barriers in the early stages of medication development for successful translation into practice in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Impairment","volume":"26 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Would you take a drug for this?': attitudes by individuals with traumatic brain injury towards medication to improve social functioning.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Reeder, Katherine Sewell, Natasha A Lannin, Madeleine J Smith, Bridgette D Semple\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/IB24051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Many people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) report problems with social functioning that can have immediate and enduring impacts. We aimed to explore perceptions of social functioning after TBI and understand attitudes towards medication that could improve long-term social outcomes. Method A qualitative descriptive approach using interview methods was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Using purposive sampling we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with people with moderate to severe TBI between July and September 2021. Results Using a framework approach, we thematically identified three themes: (1) impacts of TBI on social roles and activities, including changes in recreational activities and role changes in family units; (2) change in social networks, resulting from shifts in attitudes to social activities and mental health issues; and (3) openness to novel treatments to improve social functioning - willingness to take potential medication to improve social functioning and the factors that have an impact on decision making. Conclusion Our results highlight that people with TBI experience a range of changes in social participation post-TBI, and that they have a strong interest in improving their social functioning. Such insights provide opportunities to tailor patient-centric treatments and circumnavigate barriers in the early stages of medication development for successful translation into practice in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Impairment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24051\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB24051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者报告社会功能问题,这些问题可能会产生直接和持久的影响。我们的目的是探索脑外伤后社会功能的感知,并了解对药物治疗的态度,这些药物可以改善长期的社会结果。方法在澳大利亚维多利亚州采用访谈法进行定性描述性研究。我们在2021年7月至9月期间对中度至重度脑外伤患者进行了15次半结构化访谈。结果采用框架方法,我们确定了三个主题:(1)脑损伤对社会角色和活动的影响,包括娱乐活动的变化和家庭单位角色的变化;(2)社会网络的变化,由社会活动态度的转变和心理健康问题引起;(3)对改善社会功能的新疗法的开放程度——愿意服用可能改善社会功能的药物以及影响决策的因素。结论:我们的研究结果表明,TBI患者在TBI后的社会参与经历了一系列变化,并且他们对改善其社会功能有强烈的兴趣。这些见解为定制以患者为中心的治疗提供了机会,并在药物开发的早期阶段绕过障碍,成功地转化为这一人群的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Would you take a drug for this?': attitudes by individuals with traumatic brain injury towards medication to improve social functioning.

Background Many people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) report problems with social functioning that can have immediate and enduring impacts. We aimed to explore perceptions of social functioning after TBI and understand attitudes towards medication that could improve long-term social outcomes. Method A qualitative descriptive approach using interview methods was conducted in Victoria, Australia. Using purposive sampling we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with people with moderate to severe TBI between July and September 2021. Results Using a framework approach, we thematically identified three themes: (1) impacts of TBI on social roles and activities, including changes in recreational activities and role changes in family units; (2) change in social networks, resulting from shifts in attitudes to social activities and mental health issues; and (3) openness to novel treatments to improve social functioning - willingness to take potential medication to improve social functioning and the factors that have an impact on decision making. Conclusion Our results highlight that people with TBI experience a range of changes in social participation post-TBI, and that they have a strong interest in improving their social functioning. Such insights provide opportunities to tailor patient-centric treatments and circumnavigate barriers in the early stages of medication development for successful translation into practice in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Impairment
Brain Impairment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal addresses topics related to the aetiology, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of brain impairment with a particular focus on the implications for functional status, participation, rehabilitation and quality of life. Disciplines reflect a broad multidisciplinary scope and include neuroscience, neurology, neuropsychology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech pathology, social work, and nursing. Submissions are welcome across the full range of conditions that affect brain function (stroke, tumour, progressive neurological illnesses, dementia, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, etc.) throughout the lifespan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信