代孕合法化?来自台湾7700多名居民的意见。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wei Cheng, Shu-Hsiang Liu, Chih-Yu Chen, Kuo-Yu Chao
{"title":"代孕合法化?来自台湾7700多名居民的意见。","authors":"Wei Cheng, Shu-Hsiang Liu, Chih-Yu Chen, Kuo-Yu Chao","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores Taiwanese' perspectives on the potential legalization of surrogacy, an issue with diverse legal stances globally. Conducted between 17 December 2023 and 1 January 2024, this mixed-methods cross-sectional study employed Knowledge and Attitudes of Legalizing Surrogacy (KALS) questionnaire. This instrument assessed opinions and ethical considerations on various aspects including ethics and children's rights, surrogate health, offspring welfare, and social justice. Responses were quantitatively measured on a 5-point scale (with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge or stronger perceived impact of surrogacy on society) supplemented by qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses. Out of 7780 predominantly female participants (82.8%), all scores were higher for those did not support the legalization of surrogacy (82.1% of respondents). Noteworthy concerns were raised about potential repercussions of legalizing surrogacy, underscoring the need for broader public education before any legal reforms are implemented. There is significant apprehension about surrogacy legalization in Taiwan, especially regarding its impact on women's health and children's welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legalization of surrogacy? Opinions from more than 7700 residents in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Wei Cheng, Shu-Hsiang Liu, Chih-Yu Chen, Kuo-Yu Chao\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores Taiwanese' perspectives on the potential legalization of surrogacy, an issue with diverse legal stances globally. Conducted between 17 December 2023 and 1 January 2024, this mixed-methods cross-sectional study employed Knowledge and Attitudes of Legalizing Surrogacy (KALS) questionnaire. This instrument assessed opinions and ethical considerations on various aspects including ethics and children's rights, surrogate health, offspring welfare, and social justice. Responses were quantitatively measured on a 5-point scale (with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge or stronger perceived impact of surrogacy on society) supplemented by qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses. Out of 7780 predominantly female participants (82.8%), all scores were higher for those did not support the legalization of surrogacy (82.1% of respondents). Noteworthy concerns were raised about potential repercussions of legalizing surrogacy, underscoring the need for broader public education before any legal reforms are implemented. There is significant apprehension about surrogacy legalization in Taiwan, especially regarding its impact on women's health and children's welfare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨台湾人对代孕合法化的看法,这是一个全球法律立场各异的问题。本研究于2023年12月17日至2024年1月1日期间进行,采用混合方法的横断面研究,采用“代孕合法化知识与态度”(KALS)问卷。该文书评估了各种方面的意见和伦理考虑,包括伦理和儿童权利、代理健康、后代福利和社会正义。回答以5分制进行定量测量(分数越高表明对代孕的了解越准确或对社会的感知影响越强),并辅以开放式回答的定性内容分析。在7780名以女性为主的参与者(82.8%)中,不支持代孕合法化的人(82.1%的受访者)得分更高。值得注意的是,人们对代孕合法化的潜在影响表示关注,强调在实施任何法律改革之前,需要进行更广泛的公众教育。在台湾,人们对代孕合法化有很大的担忧,特别是考虑到它对妇女健康和儿童福利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legalization of surrogacy? Opinions from more than 7700 residents in Taiwan.

This study explores Taiwanese' perspectives on the potential legalization of surrogacy, an issue with diverse legal stances globally. Conducted between 17 December 2023 and 1 January 2024, this mixed-methods cross-sectional study employed Knowledge and Attitudes of Legalizing Surrogacy (KALS) questionnaire. This instrument assessed opinions and ethical considerations on various aspects including ethics and children's rights, surrogate health, offspring welfare, and social justice. Responses were quantitatively measured on a 5-point scale (with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge or stronger perceived impact of surrogacy on society) supplemented by qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses. Out of 7780 predominantly female participants (82.8%), all scores were higher for those did not support the legalization of surrogacy (82.1% of respondents). Noteworthy concerns were raised about potential repercussions of legalizing surrogacy, underscoring the need for broader public education before any legal reforms are implemented. There is significant apprehension about surrogacy legalization in Taiwan, especially regarding its impact on women's health and children's welfare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Policy
Journal of Public Health Policy 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive. JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones. JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信