循证实践在健康科学高等教育中的有效性分析:叙述性回顾。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0407.R1.05062024
Victória Guzzo da Silva, Dafne Port Nascimento, Sarah Beatriz Obadovski Alves Nascimento, Amanda Costa Araujo
{"title":"循证实践在健康科学高等教育中的有效性分析:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Victória Guzzo da Silva, Dafne Port Nascimento, Sarah Beatriz Obadovski Alves Nascimento, Amanda Costa Araujo","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0407.R1.05062024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although multiple strategies have been suggested for evidence-based practice educational interventions, few studies have focused on the development of abilities for evidence-based practice implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practice in higher education and understand its teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Narrative review was conducted at the Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review included research studies that measured any type of evidence-based practice teaching method and its effectiveness. Searches included publications from inception to June 2022, conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent authors descriptively extracted and analyzed the data. The methodological quality of the studies was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results determined that 79.2% of the studies proved their effectiveness. Teaching methods varied according to the time period, format, and types of questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most studies demonstrated the effectiveness of the chosen teaching methods. This study shows the importance of health professionals using evidence-based practice to ensure effective patient treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"143 1","pages":"e2023407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the effectivity of evidence-based practice in health science higher education: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Victória Guzzo da Silva, Dafne Port Nascimento, Sarah Beatriz Obadovski Alves Nascimento, Amanda Costa Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0407.R1.05062024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although multiple strategies have been suggested for evidence-based practice educational interventions, few studies have focused on the development of abilities for evidence-based practice implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practice in higher education and understand its teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Narrative review was conducted at the Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Narrative review included research studies that measured any type of evidence-based practice teaching method and its effectiveness. Searches included publications from inception to June 2022, conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent authors descriptively extracted and analyzed the data. The methodological quality of the studies was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results determined that 79.2% of the studies proved their effectiveness. Teaching methods varied according to the time period, format, and types of questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most studies demonstrated the effectiveness of the chosen teaching methods. This study shows the importance of health professionals using evidence-based practice to ensure effective patient treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"e2023407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0407.R1.05062024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0407.R1.05062024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然对循证实践教育干预提出了多种策略,但很少有研究关注循证实践实施能力的发展。目的:探讨循证实践在高等教育中的有效性,了解循证实践的教学方法。设计和环境:在巴西南卡埃塔诺市大学进行了叙事审查。方法:叙述性回顾包括了测量任何类型的循证实践教学方法及其有效性的研究。检索包括在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、CENTRAL、ERIC和Cochrane图书馆进行的从成立到2022年6月的出版物。两位独立作者对数据进行了描述性提取和分析。研究的方法学质量也进行了分析。结果:79.2%的研究证实了其有效性。教学方法根据时间、形式和问卷类型的不同而有所不同。结论:大多数研究表明所选择的教学方法是有效的。这项研究表明,卫生专业人员使用循证实践,以确保有效的病人治疗的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the effectivity of evidence-based practice in health science higher education: a narrative review.

Background: Although multiple strategies have been suggested for evidence-based practice educational interventions, few studies have focused on the development of abilities for evidence-based practice implementation.

Objective: To explore the effectiveness of evidence-based practice in higher education and understand its teaching methods.

Design and setting: Narrative review was conducted at the Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, Brazil.

Methods: Narrative review included research studies that measured any type of evidence-based practice teaching method and its effectiveness. Searches included publications from inception to June 2022, conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, ERIC, and the Cochrane Library. Two independent authors descriptively extracted and analyzed the data. The methodological quality of the studies was also analyzed.

Results: The results determined that 79.2% of the studies proved their effectiveness. Teaching methods varied according to the time period, format, and types of questionnaire.

Conclusions: Most studies demonstrated the effectiveness of the chosen teaching methods. This study shows the importance of health professionals using evidence-based practice to ensure effective patient treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信