高尔夫挥杆时胸部的角度运动:两种方向角度序列的比较。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Seungho Baek, Kanji Mori, Kai-Jen Cheng, Hunter B Alvis, Byungjoo Lee, Andrea Martinez, Young-Hoo Kwon
{"title":"高尔夫挥杆时胸部的角度运动:两种方向角度序列的比较。","authors":"Seungho Baek, Kanji Mori, Kai-Jen Cheng, Hunter B Alvis, Byungjoo Lee, Andrea Martinez, Young-Hoo Kwon","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2025.2458481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orientation angles are commonly used to describe complex angular motions of the body. Selecting the most appropriate rotation sequence for a given segment's motion is crucial. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of generalisable, primary axis-centric sequence selection strategies and to compare the lean direction-lean-rotation (LDLR) sequence, selected for thoracic motion during golf driving based on the strategies, with the conventional rotation-bend-side bend (RBSB) sequence in assessing the level of inter-angle cross-talk. The RBSB method consistently revealed a higher level of inter-angle cross-talk, with substantially larger bi-angle ICC values across all angle combinations. The rotation-side bend and bend-side bend pairs in the RBSB method exhibited the largest ICC values (≥0.837). In contrast, the rotation-lean and lean direction-lean pairs in the LDLR method showed the smallest ICC values (≤0.063). The RBSB sequence demonstrated significantly larger RMS angle ranges (<i>p</i> < .001), indicating a deterioration of the major angle and inflation of the minor angles due to cross-talk. The LDLR sequence realistically portrayed the axial rotation-dominant thoracic motion during the golf drive. The strategies outlined in this study can serve as general guidelines and substantially enhance the applicability of the orientation angle method.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angular motion of the thorax during the golf swing: a comparison of two orientation angle sequences.\",\"authors\":\"Seungho Baek, Kanji Mori, Kai-Jen Cheng, Hunter B Alvis, Byungjoo Lee, Andrea Martinez, Young-Hoo Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2025.2458481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Orientation angles are commonly used to describe complex angular motions of the body. Selecting the most appropriate rotation sequence for a given segment's motion is crucial. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of generalisable, primary axis-centric sequence selection strategies and to compare the lean direction-lean-rotation (LDLR) sequence, selected for thoracic motion during golf driving based on the strategies, with the conventional rotation-bend-side bend (RBSB) sequence in assessing the level of inter-angle cross-talk. The RBSB method consistently revealed a higher level of inter-angle cross-talk, with substantially larger bi-angle ICC values across all angle combinations. The rotation-side bend and bend-side bend pairs in the RBSB method exhibited the largest ICC values (≥0.837). In contrast, the rotation-lean and lean direction-lean pairs in the LDLR method showed the smallest ICC values (≤0.063). The RBSB sequence demonstrated significantly larger RMS angle ranges (<i>p</i> < .001), indicating a deterioration of the major angle and inflation of the minor angles due to cross-talk. The LDLR sequence realistically portrayed the axial rotation-dominant thoracic motion during the golf drive. The strategies outlined in this study can serve as general guidelines and substantially enhance the applicability of the orientation angle method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2458481\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2025.2458481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定位角通常用于描述物体的复杂角运动。为给定的部分运动选择最合适的旋转序列是至关重要的。本研究的目的是建立一套通用的、主要以轴线为中心的序列选择策略,并将根据该策略选择的用于高尔夫球驾驶过程中胸部运动的倾斜方向-倾斜-旋转(LDLR)序列与传统的旋转-弯曲-侧弯(RBSB)序列在评估角度间串扰水平方面进行比较。RBSB方法始终显示出更高水平的角度间串扰,在所有角度组合中都具有更大的双角ICC值。RBSB方法的旋转侧弯和弯曲侧弯对ICC值最大(≥0.837)。相比之下,LDLR方法的旋转-倾斜和倾斜方向-倾斜对的ICC值最小(≤0.063)。RBSB序列显示出更大的均方根角范围(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Angular motion of the thorax during the golf swing: a comparison of two orientation angle sequences.

Orientation angles are commonly used to describe complex angular motions of the body. Selecting the most appropriate rotation sequence for a given segment's motion is crucial. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of generalisable, primary axis-centric sequence selection strategies and to compare the lean direction-lean-rotation (LDLR) sequence, selected for thoracic motion during golf driving based on the strategies, with the conventional rotation-bend-side bend (RBSB) sequence in assessing the level of inter-angle cross-talk. The RBSB method consistently revealed a higher level of inter-angle cross-talk, with substantially larger bi-angle ICC values across all angle combinations. The rotation-side bend and bend-side bend pairs in the RBSB method exhibited the largest ICC values (≥0.837). In contrast, the rotation-lean and lean direction-lean pairs in the LDLR method showed the smallest ICC values (≤0.063). The RBSB sequence demonstrated significantly larger RMS angle ranges (p < .001), indicating a deterioration of the major angle and inflation of the minor angles due to cross-talk. The LDLR sequence realistically portrayed the axial rotation-dominant thoracic motion during the golf drive. The strategies outlined in this study can serve as general guidelines and substantially enhance the applicability of the orientation angle method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信