Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata
{"title":"LC-MS/MS和免疫分析法测定全血他克莫司浓度:他克莫司速释与缓释剂型的影响。","authors":"Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"546-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations.\",\"authors\":\"Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfae156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"546-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations.
Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.
Methods: Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.
Results: External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).
Conclusions: Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.