LC-MS/MS和免疫分析法测定全血他克莫司浓度:他克莫司速释与缓释剂型的影响。

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata
{"title":"LC-MS/MS和免疫分析法测定全血他克莫司浓度:他克莫司速释与缓释剂型的影响。","authors":"Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"546-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations.\",\"authors\":\"Adekunle Alabi, Mengyuan Ge, Jeremiah D Momper, Shirley M Tsunoda, Michael J Kelner, Robert L Fitzgerald, Raymond T Suhandynata\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfae156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"546-558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫抑制剂他克莫司的治疗药物监测通常通过免疫测定或LC-MS/MS进行。这些方法之间的测量偏差已被表征为立即释放的他克莫司(IR-tac;但尚未在缓释制剂(如Envarsus)中进行。这些差异会影响患者护理,因为需要适当的剂量来维持治疗浓度和免疫抑制。方法:采用可溯源校准器(他克莫司,ERM-DA110a)和他克莫司的质控品和他克莫司的去甲基标准品,建立全血LC-MS/MS同时定量他克莫司及其主要代谢物他克莫司的方法。采用LC-MS/MS和ARCHITECT免疫分析法对接受IR-tac或Envarsus临床治疗的患者进行他克莫司浓度测定。结果:他克莫司和去甲基他克莫司的外标曲线均呈良好的线性关系(R2为> 0.995),他克莫司的分析测量范围为1.1 ~ 31.6 ng/mL。在整个AMR中,校准器/QC偏差在其加标浓度的15%以内,并且在运行内不精确。结论:在接受速释和缓释制剂的患者中,免疫测定和LC-MS/MS他克莫司测量之间的偏差表明,它们不同的药代动力学特征影响测量的准确性。在解释他克莫司浓度测量时应考虑这些分析偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of Whole Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations by LC-MS/MS and Immunoassay Methods: Influence of Immediate-Release vs Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus is commonly performed by immunoassay or LC-MS/MS. Measurement biases between these methodologies have been characterized for immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-tac; Prograf) but have not been performed for extended-release formulations such as Envarsus. These discrepancies can impact patient care, as appropriate dosing is required to maintain therapeutic concentrations and immunosuppression.

Methods: Validation of a whole-blood LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of tacrolimus and its major metabolite, desmethyl tacrolimus, was performed using traceable calibrators (tacrolimus, ERM-DA110a) and quality control (QC) material for tacrolimus and standard material for desmethyl tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by LC-MS/MS and the ARCHITECT immunoassay in patients receiving either IR-tac or Envarsus for clinical care.

Results: External calibration curves for both tacrolimus and desmethyl tacrolimus were linear (R2 > 0.995), and the analytical measurement range (AMR) for tacrolimus spanned from 1.1 to 31.6 ng/mL. Calibrator/QC biases were within 15% of their spiked concentrations throughout the AMR, and within-run imprecision was <10%, except at the lower limit of quantification (n = 25). Between-run imprecision for low, mid, and high QC levels was ≤11% over a 2-week period (n = 5 days). Comparative biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS were significantly lower (P = 0.0074) for patients receiving Envarsus (n = 20 specimens) relative to patients receiving IR-tac (n = 32 specimens).

Conclusions: Biases between immunoassay and LC-MS/MS tacrolimus measurements in patients receiving immediate-release vs extended-release formulations indicate that their distinct pharmacokinetic profiles impact measurement accuracy. These assay biases should be considered when interpreting tacrolimus concentration measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信