IF 1.7 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Kaita N. Gurian, Debra Guatelli-Steinberg, W. Scott McGraw, Jess Rychel, Mackie C. O'Hara
{"title":"Inter-Observer Processing and Measurement Error Are Low for 2D Dental Measurements on Shared microCT Scans","authors":"Kaita N. Gurian,&nbsp;Debra Guatelli-Steinberg,&nbsp;W. Scott McGraw,&nbsp;Jess Rychel,&nbsp;Mackie C. O'Hara","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Sharing micro-computed tomographic (μCT) scans of teeth increases data accessibility and reduces the need for repeated scans of any given specimen. However, the use of the same TIFF stacks or DICOMs by multiple individuals has the potential to introduce new sources of error. Here, we explore whether use of the same μCT scans by different persons produces comparable results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Worn (<i>N</i> = 11) and unworn (<i>N</i> = 4) <i>Cercocebus atys</i> upper molars (UM1 <i>N</i> = 8, UM2 <i>N</i> = 7) were μCT scanned using a Bruker Skyscan 1172 High Resolution Ex Vivo Scanner at a resolution of 22 μm. Two individuals (K.N.G. and M.C.O.) created a 2D mesial slice for each TIFF stack (tooth). Worn teeth were reconstructed by K.N.G. and M.C.O. Three researchers (M.C.O., K.N.G., and J.R.) measured tooth shape, linear enamel thickness, average enamel thickness, and relative enamel thickness (AET and RET). Inter-observer percent error was calculated for each measurement. Univariate ANOVAs were calculated to evaluate variance due to slice maker, reconstructor, tooth, and measurer when percent error averaged &gt; 5%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For unworn teeth, error was generally low and largely due to the person doing the measurement. For worn teeth, wear reconstructor was a statistically significant source of variation for AET and RET.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that (1) inter-observer error was generally low, (2) linear measurements are prone to error, (3) worn teeth did not present an additional source of error as compared to unworn teeth, and (4) different people can use the same μCT scans to reliably reconstruct, slice, and measure teeth.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"186 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:共享牙齿的微型计算机断层扫描(μCT)可提高数据的可访问性,并减少对任何给定标本重复扫描的需要。然而,多人使用相同的 TIFF 文件或 DICOM 文件有可能带来新的误差源。在此,我们探讨了不同的人使用相同的μCT扫描是否会产生可比的结果:使用布鲁克 Skyscan 1172 高分辨率体外扫描仪以 22 μm 的分辨率对磨损(N = 11)和未磨损(N = 4)的 Cercocebus atys 上臼齿(UM1 N = 8,UM2 N = 7)进行 μCT 扫描。两个人(K.N.G.和 M.C.O.)为每个 TIFF 堆栈(牙齿)创建了一个二维中轴切片。三名研究人员(M.C.O.、K.N.G.和 J.R.)测量了牙齿形状、线性釉质厚度、平均釉质厚度和相对釉质厚度(AET 和 RET)。每次测量都计算了观察者之间的百分比误差。当误差百分比平均大于 5%时,计算单变量方差分析以评估切片制作者、重建者、牙齿和测量者造成的差异:结果:对于未磨损的牙齿,误差一般较低,主要是测量者造成的。对于磨损的牙齿,磨损重建器是造成 AET 和 RET 差异的重要原因:我们发现:(1) 观察者之间的误差普遍较低;(2) 线性测量容易产生误差;(3) 与未磨损的牙齿相比,磨损的牙齿不会产生额外的误差;(4) 不同的人可以使用相同的 μCT 扫描来可靠地重建、切片和测量牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inter-Observer Processing and Measurement Error Are Low for 2D Dental Measurements on Shared microCT Scans

Inter-Observer Processing and Measurement Error Are Low for 2D Dental Measurements on Shared microCT Scans

Objectives

Sharing micro-computed tomographic (μCT) scans of teeth increases data accessibility and reduces the need for repeated scans of any given specimen. However, the use of the same TIFF stacks or DICOMs by multiple individuals has the potential to introduce new sources of error. Here, we explore whether use of the same μCT scans by different persons produces comparable results.

Materials and Methods

Worn (N = 11) and unworn (N = 4) Cercocebus atys upper molars (UM1 N = 8, UM2 N = 7) were μCT scanned using a Bruker Skyscan 1172 High Resolution Ex Vivo Scanner at a resolution of 22 μm. Two individuals (K.N.G. and M.C.O.) created a 2D mesial slice for each TIFF stack (tooth). Worn teeth were reconstructed by K.N.G. and M.C.O. Three researchers (M.C.O., K.N.G., and J.R.) measured tooth shape, linear enamel thickness, average enamel thickness, and relative enamel thickness (AET and RET). Inter-observer percent error was calculated for each measurement. Univariate ANOVAs were calculated to evaluate variance due to slice maker, reconstructor, tooth, and measurer when percent error averaged > 5%.

Results

For unworn teeth, error was generally low and largely due to the person doing the measurement. For worn teeth, wear reconstructor was a statistically significant source of variation for AET and RET.

Discussion

We found that (1) inter-observer error was generally low, (2) linear measurements are prone to error, (3) worn teeth did not present an additional source of error as compared to unworn teeth, and (4) different people can use the same μCT scans to reliably reconstruct, slice, and measure teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信