Nurul Hani Mardi, Lee Woen Ean, Marlinda Abdul Malek, Kok Hua Chua, Ali Najah Ahmed
{"title":"用生命周期评价方法分析煤电对水的影响:以马来西亚为例。","authors":"Nurul Hani Mardi, Lee Woen Ean, Marlinda Abdul Malek, Kok Hua Chua, Ali Najah Ahmed","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10<sup>-4</sup> kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10<sup>-5</sup> kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 2","pages":"219-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia.\",\"authors\":\"Nurul Hani Mardi, Lee Woen Ean, Marlinda Abdul Malek, Kok Hua Chua, Ali Najah Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wst.2024.402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10<sup>-2</sup> kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10<sup>-4</sup> kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10<sup>-5</sup> kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"91 2\",\"pages\":\"219-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
燃煤电厂对空气污染产生了不利影响,但它们也对我们的水源构成了风险。发电厂排放的废水可能会降低附近水体的水质。本研究使用生命周期评估方法评估了马来西亚超超临界燃煤电厂发电对水相关环境的潜在影响。库存数据来自马来西亚一家发电厂,支持数据来自相关文献。利用ReCiPe 2016影响评价方法,分析了淡水富营养化(FEP)、海洋富营养化(MEP)、淡水生态毒性(FETP)和海洋生态毒性(METP)的中点影响类别。结果表明,METP是最大风险,平均影响1.94 × 10-2 kg 1,4- dcb / kWh发电量,其次是FETP (1.40 × 10-2 kg 1,4- dcb)、FEP (4.66 × 10-4 kg P eq)和MEP (2.95 × 10-5 kg N eq)。大约95%的中点影响是由于硬煤的提取和加工。这些发现强调了供应链层面环境管理的一个关键方面。此外,通过与以前的研究进行比较,可以证明,减少发电的直接排放可以减少中点影响。
Water impact analysis due to coal-electricity generation using the life cycle assessment method: a case study in Malaysia.
Coal power plants adversely impact air pollution, but they also pose a risk to our water sources. Discharge wastewater from power plants may degrade the quality of nearby water bodies. This study evaluates the potential water-related environmental impacts of electricity generation at an ultra-supercritical coal power plant in Malaysia using the life cycle assessment method. The inventory data were gathered from a Malaysian power plant, and supporting data were taken from the relevant literature. Utilizing the ReCiPe 2016 impact assessment method, this study analyses the mid-point impact categories of freshwater eutrophication (FEP), marine eutrophication (MEP), freshwater ecotoxicity (FETP), and marine ecotoxicity (METP). The results indicate that METP is the leading risk, with an average impact of 1.94 × 10-2 kg 1,4-DCB per kWh electricity generated, followed by FETP (1.40 × 10-2 kg 1,4-DCB), FEP (4.66 × 10-4 kg P eq), and MEP (2.95 × 10-5 kg N eq). About 95% of the mid-point impact is due to the extraction and processing of hard coal. These findings underscore a critical aspect of environmental management at the supply chain level. Furthermore, mitigating direct emissions from power generation could reduce the mid-point impact, as demonstrated by comparisons with previous research.
期刊介绍:
Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.