在美国销量最高的六家快餐店,85%的菜品都是超加工的。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Anthony J Basile, Nereus K Noshirwani, Karen L Sweazea
{"title":"在美国销量最高的六家快餐店,85%的菜品都是超加工的。","authors":"Anthony J Basile, Nereus K Noshirwani, Karen L Sweazea","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While fast-food is typically considered highly processed, an analysis to demonstrate this has yet to be conducted. Therefore, the objective of this research was to examine the menu items and ingredients from six fast-food restaurant menus using the NOVA classification.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected from the top six highest selling US restaurants, per each food category, identified using the Quick Service and Fast Casual Restaurants (QSR) 2020 report.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 740 menu items were identified and classified according to their degree of processing based on ingredient lists using the NOVA classification: minimally processed (MPF), culinary processed ingredient (CPF), processed (PRF) or ultra-processed (UPF). In addition, individual ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were classified into NOVA groups, and the twenty most common ingredients were identified based on frequency of appearance in ingredient lists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all menus, 85 % (range: 70-94 %) of items were UPF with only 11 % (range: 6-25 %) being MPF (<i>P</i> < 0·001). Additionally, 46 % of the ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were ultra-processed ingredients. Three ultra-processed ingredients appeared on all six menus: natural flavours, xanthan gum and citric acid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show that the vast majority of menu items from major fast-food restaurants are UPF, and there are few options for MPF. Fast-food companies should consider reformulation or the addition of MPF to the menu to increase healthful food options for their patrons.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eighty-five percent of menu items from the six highest selling fast-food restaurants in the USA are ultra-processed.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony J Basile, Nereus K Noshirwani, Karen L Sweazea\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025000060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>While fast-food is typically considered highly processed, an analysis to demonstrate this has yet to be conducted. Therefore, the objective of this research was to examine the menu items and ingredients from six fast-food restaurant menus using the NOVA classification.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data were collected from the top six highest selling US restaurants, per each food category, identified using the Quick Service and Fast Casual Restaurants (QSR) 2020 report.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 740 menu items were identified and classified according to their degree of processing based on ingredient lists using the NOVA classification: minimally processed (MPF), culinary processed ingredient (CPF), processed (PRF) or ultra-processed (UPF). In addition, individual ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were classified into NOVA groups, and the twenty most common ingredients were identified based on frequency of appearance in ingredient lists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all menus, 85 % (range: 70-94 %) of items were UPF with only 11 % (range: 6-25 %) being MPF (<i>P</i> < 0·001). Additionally, 46 % of the ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were ultra-processed ingredients. Three ultra-processed ingredients appeared on all six menus: natural flavours, xanthan gum and citric acid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings show that the vast majority of menu items from major fast-food restaurants are UPF, and there are few options for MPF. Fast-food companies should consider reformulation or the addition of MPF to the menu to increase healthful food options for their patrons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000060\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然快餐通常被认为是高度加工的,但尚未进行分析来证明这一点。因此,本研究的目的是使用NOVA分类来检查六家快餐店菜单上的菜单项目和成分。设计:横断面研究。环境:根据《2020年快速服务和快速休闲餐厅(QSR)报告》,根据每种食品类别,从美国销量最高的六家餐厅收集数据。参与者:总共740个菜单项目被识别和分类,根据他们的加工程度基于成分表使用NOVA分类:最低加工(MPF),烹饪加工成分(CPF),加工(PRF),或超加工(UPF)。此外,至少在三个菜单上出现的单个成分被分类为NOVA组,并且根据成分表中出现的频率确定了20种最常见的成分。结果:在所有菜单中,85%(范围:70-94%)的项目是upf,只有11%(范围:6-25%)是强积金。结论:这些发现表明,主要快餐店的绝大多数菜单项目都是upf,而强积金的选择很少。快餐公司应该考虑重新配方或在菜单中添加强积金,以增加顾客的健康食品选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eighty-five percent of menu items from the six highest selling fast-food restaurants in the USA are ultra-processed.

Objective: While fast-food is typically considered highly processed, an analysis to demonstrate this has yet to be conducted. Therefore, the objective of this research was to examine the menu items and ingredients from six fast-food restaurant menus using the NOVA classification.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Data were collected from the top six highest selling US restaurants, per each food category, identified using the Quick Service and Fast Casual Restaurants (QSR) 2020 report.

Participants: A total of 740 menu items were identified and classified according to their degree of processing based on ingredient lists using the NOVA classification: minimally processed (MPF), culinary processed ingredient (CPF), processed (PRF) or ultra-processed (UPF). In addition, individual ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were classified into NOVA groups, and the twenty most common ingredients were identified based on frequency of appearance in ingredient lists.

Results: Across all menus, 85 % (range: 70-94 %) of items were UPF with only 11 % (range: 6-25 %) being MPF (P < 0·001). Additionally, 46 % of the ingredients that appeared on at least three menus were ultra-processed ingredients. Three ultra-processed ingredients appeared on all six menus: natural flavours, xanthan gum and citric acid.

Conclusions: These findings show that the vast majority of menu items from major fast-food restaurants are UPF, and there are few options for MPF. Fast-food companies should consider reformulation or the addition of MPF to the menu to increase healthful food options for their patrons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信