职业性氡暴露对肺癌终生风险的系统分析

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
M Sommer, F Heinzl, P Scholz-Kreisel, D Wollschläger, C Heumann, N Fenske
{"title":"职业性氡暴露对肺癌终生风险的系统分析","authors":"M Sommer, F Heinzl, P Scholz-Kreisel, D Wollschläger, C Heumann, N Fenske","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00060.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lifetime risk estimates play a key role in many areas of radiation research. Here, the focus is on the lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) for dying from lung cancer due to occupational radon exposure based on uranium miners cohort studies. The major components in estimating LEAR were systematically varied to investigate the variability and uncertainties of results. Major components of the LEAR calculation are baseline mortality rates for lung cancer and all causes of death, risk model and exposure scenario. Sex-averaged mortality rates were chosen from a mixed Euro-American-Asian population, in addition to mortality rates to represent heavy and light smokers. Seven radon-related lung cancer risk models derived from different uranium miners cohorts were compared. As exposure scenarios, occupational exposure of two working level months (WLM) from age 18-64 years was considered, and three scenarios from the German uranium miners cohort. Further components were modified in sensitivity analyses. The LEAR was compared to other lifetime risk measures. With a range from less than 0.6 × 10-4 to over 8.0 × 10-4, LEAR per WLM estimates were influenced heavily by the choice of risk models. Notably, mortality rates, particularly lung cancer mortality rates, had a strong impact on LEAR per WLM across all models. The LEAR per WLM exhibited only low variation to changes in exposure scenarios for all risk models, except for the BEIR VI model fitted on the pooled 11 miners study. All assessed lifetime risk measures displayed a monotonically increasing relationship between exposure and lifetime risk at low to moderate exposures, with minor differences between ELR, REID, and LEAR (all per WLM). RADS yields the largest lifetime risk estimates in most situations. There is substantial variation in LEAR per WLM estimates depending on the choice of underlying calculation components. Reference populations and mortality rates should be selected with care depending on the application of lifetime risk calculations. The explicit choice of the lifetime risk measure was found to be negligible. These findings should be taken into consideration when using lifetime risk measures for radiation protection policy purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"175-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifetime Risks for Lung Cancer due to Occupational Radon Exposure: A Systematic Analysis of Estimation Components.\",\"authors\":\"M Sommer, F Heinzl, P Scholz-Kreisel, D Wollschläger, C Heumann, N Fenske\",\"doi\":\"10.1667/RADE-24-00060.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lifetime risk estimates play a key role in many areas of radiation research. Here, the focus is on the lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) for dying from lung cancer due to occupational radon exposure based on uranium miners cohort studies. The major components in estimating LEAR were systematically varied to investigate the variability and uncertainties of results. Major components of the LEAR calculation are baseline mortality rates for lung cancer and all causes of death, risk model and exposure scenario. Sex-averaged mortality rates were chosen from a mixed Euro-American-Asian population, in addition to mortality rates to represent heavy and light smokers. Seven radon-related lung cancer risk models derived from different uranium miners cohorts were compared. As exposure scenarios, occupational exposure of two working level months (WLM) from age 18-64 years was considered, and three scenarios from the German uranium miners cohort. Further components were modified in sensitivity analyses. The LEAR was compared to other lifetime risk measures. With a range from less than 0.6 × 10-4 to over 8.0 × 10-4, LEAR per WLM estimates were influenced heavily by the choice of risk models. Notably, mortality rates, particularly lung cancer mortality rates, had a strong impact on LEAR per WLM across all models. The LEAR per WLM exhibited only low variation to changes in exposure scenarios for all risk models, except for the BEIR VI model fitted on the pooled 11 miners study. All assessed lifetime risk measures displayed a monotonically increasing relationship between exposure and lifetime risk at low to moderate exposures, with minor differences between ELR, REID, and LEAR (all per WLM). RADS yields the largest lifetime risk estimates in most situations. There is substantial variation in LEAR per WLM estimates depending on the choice of underlying calculation components. Reference populations and mortality rates should be selected with care depending on the application of lifetime risk calculations. The explicit choice of the lifetime risk measure was found to be negligible. These findings should be taken into consideration when using lifetime risk measures for radiation protection policy purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"175-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00060.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00060.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

终生风险评估在辐射研究的许多领域中起着关键作用。本文的重点是基于铀矿工人队列研究的职业性氡暴露导致肺癌死亡的终生超额绝对风险(LEAR)。系统地改变估算LEAR的主要成分,以研究结果的变异性和不确定性。LEAR计算的主要组成部分是肺癌和所有死亡原因的基线死亡率、风险模型和接触情景。除重度和轻度吸烟者的死亡率外,还从欧洲-美国-亚洲混合人群中选择了性别平均死亡率。对来自不同铀矿工人群体的七种氡相关肺癌风险模型进行了比较。暴露情景考虑了18-64岁两个工作水平月(WLM)的职业暴露,以及来自德国铀矿工人队列的三个情景。进一步的成分在敏感性分析中进行了修改。将LEAR与其他终生风险指标进行比较。在小于0.6 × 10-4到大于8.0 × 10-4的范围内,每个WLM估计的LEAR受到风险模型选择的严重影响。值得注意的是,死亡率,特别是肺癌死亡率,对所有模型的每个WLM的LEAR有很大影响。每个WLM的LEAR对所有风险模型的暴露情景变化只有很低的变化,除了BEIR VI模型适用于汇总的11名矿工研究。所有评估的终生风险指标均显示,在低至中度暴露时,暴露与终生风险之间存在单调增加的关系,ELR、REID和LEAR之间存在微小差异(均按WLM计算)。在大多数情况下,RADS产生最大的终生风险估计。每个WLM估计的LEAR有很大的变化,这取决于底层计算组件的选择。参照人群和死亡率应根据终生风险计算的应用情况谨慎选择。终生风险测量的明确选择被发现可以忽略不计。在为辐射防护政策目的使用终身风险措施时,应考虑到这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lifetime Risks for Lung Cancer due to Occupational Radon Exposure: A Systematic Analysis of Estimation Components.

Lifetime risk estimates play a key role in many areas of radiation research. Here, the focus is on the lifetime excess absolute risk (LEAR) for dying from lung cancer due to occupational radon exposure based on uranium miners cohort studies. The major components in estimating LEAR were systematically varied to investigate the variability and uncertainties of results. Major components of the LEAR calculation are baseline mortality rates for lung cancer and all causes of death, risk model and exposure scenario. Sex-averaged mortality rates were chosen from a mixed Euro-American-Asian population, in addition to mortality rates to represent heavy and light smokers. Seven radon-related lung cancer risk models derived from different uranium miners cohorts were compared. As exposure scenarios, occupational exposure of two working level months (WLM) from age 18-64 years was considered, and three scenarios from the German uranium miners cohort. Further components were modified in sensitivity analyses. The LEAR was compared to other lifetime risk measures. With a range from less than 0.6 × 10-4 to over 8.0 × 10-4, LEAR per WLM estimates were influenced heavily by the choice of risk models. Notably, mortality rates, particularly lung cancer mortality rates, had a strong impact on LEAR per WLM across all models. The LEAR per WLM exhibited only low variation to changes in exposure scenarios for all risk models, except for the BEIR VI model fitted on the pooled 11 miners study. All assessed lifetime risk measures displayed a monotonically increasing relationship between exposure and lifetime risk at low to moderate exposures, with minor differences between ELR, REID, and LEAR (all per WLM). RADS yields the largest lifetime risk estimates in most situations. There is substantial variation in LEAR per WLM estimates depending on the choice of underlying calculation components. Reference populations and mortality rates should be selected with care depending on the application of lifetime risk calculations. The explicit choice of the lifetime risk measure was found to be negligible. These findings should be taken into consideration when using lifetime risk measures for radiation protection policy purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation research
Radiation research 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
179
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radiation Research publishes original articles dealing with radiation effects and related subjects in the areas of physics, chemistry, biology and medicine, including epidemiology and translational research. The term radiation is used in its broadest sense and includes specifically ionizing radiation and ultraviolet, visible and infrared light as well as microwaves, ultrasound and heat. Effects may be physical, chemical or biological. Related subjects include (but are not limited to) dosimetry methods and instrumentation, isotope techniques and studies with chemical agents contributing to the understanding of radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信