2型糖尿病患者对决策辅助评估降糖药物偏好的观点:选择的困境。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-01-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S486553
Sonia Roldan Munoz, Peter G M Mol, Femke de Vries, Peter R van Dijk, Hans Hillege, Douwe Postmus, Sieta T de Vries
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者对决策辅助评估降糖药物偏好的观点:选择的困境。","authors":"Sonia Roldan Munoz, Peter G M Mol, Femke de Vries, Peter R van Dijk, Hans Hillege, Douwe Postmus, Sieta T de Vries","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S486553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment guidelines recommend metformin as initial drug in many people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low risk of cardiovascular disease, with the possibility to switch to or add other drug classes. A decision aid (DA) could be useful to incorporate a patient's preferences in the decision of which drug class to choose. We developed such a DA and assessed the perspectives of people with T2D towards its comprehensibility and usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DA consists of a paper-based leaflet followed by a web-based preference elicitation exercise. The leaflet aims at informing patients about drug characteristics (eg, efficacy, safety). The relative importance of these drug characteristics for each participant are then assessed in a web-based exercise, which results in a ranking of the preferred drug classes. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted among Dutch patients with T2D who were or had ever been under pharmacological treatment for T2D. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients participated (median age 64 years, nine women, and most had T2D >10 years). Risk of hypoglycaemia was most often the characteristic to which patients attached the highest importance (n=5). A glucagon-like peptide-1-antagonist weekly injection fitted best the preferences of most patients (n=8). The interviews revealed improvements for text, pictograms and figures, and formatting, and increased comprehension of how patients completed the DA. Regarding usability, missing information was identified, as well as patients' perspectives about the usefulness of the DA and its role in shared-decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DA was considered promising for shared-decision making but further improvements regarding its comprehensibility and usability are needed, for which this study provides clear guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"215-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Towards a Decision Aid Assessing Preferences of Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The Dilemma of Choosing.\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Roldan Munoz, Peter G M Mol, Femke de Vries, Peter R van Dijk, Hans Hillege, Douwe Postmus, Sieta T de Vries\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S486553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment guidelines recommend metformin as initial drug in many people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low risk of cardiovascular disease, with the possibility to switch to or add other drug classes. A decision aid (DA) could be useful to incorporate a patient's preferences in the decision of which drug class to choose. We developed such a DA and assessed the perspectives of people with T2D towards its comprehensibility and usability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The DA consists of a paper-based leaflet followed by a web-based preference elicitation exercise. The leaflet aims at informing patients about drug characteristics (eg, efficacy, safety). The relative importance of these drug characteristics for each participant are then assessed in a web-based exercise, which results in a ranking of the preferred drug classes. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted among Dutch patients with T2D who were or had ever been under pharmacological treatment for T2D. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients participated (median age 64 years, nine women, and most had T2D >10 years). Risk of hypoglycaemia was most often the characteristic to which patients attached the highest importance (n=5). A glucagon-like peptide-1-antagonist weekly injection fitted best the preferences of most patients (n=8). The interviews revealed improvements for text, pictograms and figures, and formatting, and increased comprehension of how patients completed the DA. Regarding usability, missing information was identified, as well as patients' perspectives about the usefulness of the DA and its role in shared-decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DA was considered promising for shared-decision making but further improvements regarding its comprehensibility and usability are needed, for which this study provides clear guidance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"215-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S486553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S486553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗指南推荐二甲双胍作为许多2型糖尿病(T2D)和低心血管疾病风险患者的初始药物,并有可能切换到或添加其他药物类别。辅助决策(DA)可以在决定选择哪种药物类别时结合患者的偏好。我们开发了这样一个数据分析,并评估了T2D患者对其可理解性和可用性的看法。方法:DA包括基于纸张的传单,然后是基于网络的偏好激发练习。该单张旨在告知患者药物特性(如疗效、安全性)。然后在基于网络的练习中评估这些药物特征对每个参与者的相对重要性,从而得出首选药物类别的排名。一项采用半结构化访谈的定性研究在荷兰T2D患者中进行,这些患者正在或曾经接受过T2D的药物治疗。录音采访是逐字逐句记录下来的。进行了专题分析。结果:15例患者(中位年龄64岁,9例女性,大多数患有T2D bb10年)。低血糖风险通常是患者最重视的特征(n=5)。每周注射胰高血糖素样肽-1拮抗剂最符合大多数患者的偏好(n=8)。访谈显示,患者在文本、象形图和图形以及格式方面都有所改善,并且对患者如何完成DA的理解也有所提高。关于可用性,缺失的信息被确定,以及患者对DA的有用性及其在共同决策中的作用的看法。结论:数据数据在共享决策方面具有较好的应用前景,但在可理解性和可用性方面还有待进一步改进,本研究为进一步改进提供了明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Towards a Decision Aid Assessing Preferences of Glucose-Lowering Drugs: The Dilemma of Choosing.

Background: Treatment guidelines recommend metformin as initial drug in many people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and low risk of cardiovascular disease, with the possibility to switch to or add other drug classes. A decision aid (DA) could be useful to incorporate a patient's preferences in the decision of which drug class to choose. We developed such a DA and assessed the perspectives of people with T2D towards its comprehensibility and usability.

Methods: The DA consists of a paper-based leaflet followed by a web-based preference elicitation exercise. The leaflet aims at informing patients about drug characteristics (eg, efficacy, safety). The relative importance of these drug characteristics for each participant are then assessed in a web-based exercise, which results in a ranking of the preferred drug classes. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted among Dutch patients with T2D who were or had ever been under pharmacological treatment for T2D. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Fifteen patients participated (median age 64 years, nine women, and most had T2D >10 years). Risk of hypoglycaemia was most often the characteristic to which patients attached the highest importance (n=5). A glucagon-like peptide-1-antagonist weekly injection fitted best the preferences of most patients (n=8). The interviews revealed improvements for text, pictograms and figures, and formatting, and increased comprehension of how patients completed the DA. Regarding usability, missing information was identified, as well as patients' perspectives about the usefulness of the DA and its role in shared-decision making.

Conclusion: The DA was considered promising for shared-decision making but further improvements regarding its comprehensibility and usability are needed, for which this study provides clear guidance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信