基于计算物理化学性质和涡虫实验表型分析的神经活性药物分类。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315394
Danielle Ireland, Christina Rabeler, Sagar Rao, Rudy J Richardson, Eva-Maria S Collins
{"title":"基于计算物理化学性质和涡虫实验表型分析的神经活性药物分类。","authors":"Danielle Ireland, Christina Rabeler, Sagar Rao, Rudy J Richardson, Eva-Maria S Collins","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0315394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mental illnesses put a tremendous burden on afflicted individuals and society. Identification of novel drugs to treat such conditions is intrinsically challenging due to the complexity of neuropsychiatric diseases and the need for a systems-level understanding that goes beyond single molecule-target interactions. Thus far, drug discovery approaches focused on target-based in silico or in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) have had limited success because they cannot capture pathway interactions or predict how a compound will affect the whole organism. Organismal behavioral testing is needed to fill the gap, but mammalian studies are too time-consuming and cost-prohibitive for the early stages of drug discovery. Behavioral medium-throughput screening (MTS) in small organisms promises to address this need and complement in silico and in vitro HTS to improve the discovery of novel neuroactive compounds. Here, we used cheminformatics and MTS in the freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica-an invertebrate system used for neurotoxicant testing-to evaluate the extent to which complementary insight could be gained from the two data streams. In this pilot study, our goal was to classify 19 neuroactive compounds into their functional categories: antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants. Drug classification was performed with the same computational methods, using either physicochemical descriptors or planarian behavioral profiling. As it was not obvious a priori which classification method was most suited to this task, we compared the performance of four classification approaches. We used principal coordinate analysis or uniform manifold approximation and projection, each coupled with linear discriminant analysis, and two types of machine learning models-artificial neural net ensembles and support vector machines. Classification based on physicochemical properties had comparable accuracy to classification based on planarian profiling, especially with the machine learning models that all had accuracies of 90-100%. Planarian behavioral MTS correctly identified drugs with multiple therapeutic uses, thus yielding additional information compared to cheminformatics. Given that planarian behavioral MTS is an inexpensive true 3R (refine, reduce, replace) alternative to vertebrate testing and requires zero a priori knowledge about a chemical, it is a promising experimental system to complement in silico cheminformatics to identify new drug candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0315394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Ireland, Christina Rabeler, Sagar Rao, Rudy J Richardson, Eva-Maria S Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0315394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mental illnesses put a tremendous burden on afflicted individuals and society. Identification of novel drugs to treat such conditions is intrinsically challenging due to the complexity of neuropsychiatric diseases and the need for a systems-level understanding that goes beyond single molecule-target interactions. Thus far, drug discovery approaches focused on target-based in silico or in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) have had limited success because they cannot capture pathway interactions or predict how a compound will affect the whole organism. Organismal behavioral testing is needed to fill the gap, but mammalian studies are too time-consuming and cost-prohibitive for the early stages of drug discovery. Behavioral medium-throughput screening (MTS) in small organisms promises to address this need and complement in silico and in vitro HTS to improve the discovery of novel neuroactive compounds. Here, we used cheminformatics and MTS in the freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica-an invertebrate system used for neurotoxicant testing-to evaluate the extent to which complementary insight could be gained from the two data streams. In this pilot study, our goal was to classify 19 neuroactive compounds into their functional categories: antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants. Drug classification was performed with the same computational methods, using either physicochemical descriptors or planarian behavioral profiling. As it was not obvious a priori which classification method was most suited to this task, we compared the performance of four classification approaches. We used principal coordinate analysis or uniform manifold approximation and projection, each coupled with linear discriminant analysis, and two types of machine learning models-artificial neural net ensembles and support vector machines. Classification based on physicochemical properties had comparable accuracy to classification based on planarian profiling, especially with the machine learning models that all had accuracies of 90-100%. Planarian behavioral MTS correctly identified drugs with multiple therapeutic uses, thus yielding additional information compared to cheminformatics. Given that planarian behavioral MTS is an inexpensive true 3R (refine, reduce, replace) alternative to vertebrate testing and requires zero a priori knowledge about a chemical, it is a promising experimental system to complement in silico cheminformatics to identify new drug candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"e0315394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精神疾病给患者和社会带来了巨大的负担。由于神经精神疾病的复杂性以及需要超越单分子-靶标相互作用的系统级理解,鉴定治疗此类疾病的新药本质上具有挑战性。到目前为止,药物发现方法主要集中在基于靶标的计算机或体外高通量筛选(HTS)上,但取得的成功有限,因为它们不能捕获途径相互作用或预测化合物如何影响整个生物体。机体行为测试需要填补这一空白,但哺乳动物研究对于药物发现的早期阶段来说过于耗时和成本过高。小生物的行为中通量筛选(MTS)有望满足这一需求,并补充在硅和体外的HTS,以促进新的神经活性化合物的发现。在这里,我们在淡水涡虫Dugesia japonica(一种用于神经毒性测试的无脊椎动物系统)中使用化学信息学和MTS来评估从两种数据流中获得互补见解的程度。在这项初步研究中,我们的目标是将19种神经活性化合物分类为它们的功能类别:抗精神病药、抗焦虑药和抗抑郁药。使用相同的计算方法进行药物分类,使用物理化学描述符或涡虫行为谱。由于没有明显的先验分类方法最适合这个任务,我们比较了四种分类方法的性能。我们使用主坐标分析或均匀流形逼近和投影,每个都与线性判别分析相结合,以及两种类型的机器学习模型-人工神经网络集成和支持向量机。基于物理化学性质的分类与基于涡虫特征的分类具有相当的准确性,特别是机器学习模型的准确率都在90-100%之间。涡虫行为MTS正确地识别了具有多种治疗用途的药物,因此与化学信息学相比,产生了额外的信息。考虑到动物行为MTS是一种廉价的、真正的3R(提炼、减少、替代)替代脊椎动物测试的方法,并且不需要对化学物质有任何先验知识,它是一种很有前途的实验系统,可以补充硅化学信息学来识别新的候选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing classes of neuroactive drugs based on computational physicochemical properties and experimental phenotypic profiling in planarians.

Mental illnesses put a tremendous burden on afflicted individuals and society. Identification of novel drugs to treat such conditions is intrinsically challenging due to the complexity of neuropsychiatric diseases and the need for a systems-level understanding that goes beyond single molecule-target interactions. Thus far, drug discovery approaches focused on target-based in silico or in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) have had limited success because they cannot capture pathway interactions or predict how a compound will affect the whole organism. Organismal behavioral testing is needed to fill the gap, but mammalian studies are too time-consuming and cost-prohibitive for the early stages of drug discovery. Behavioral medium-throughput screening (MTS) in small organisms promises to address this need and complement in silico and in vitro HTS to improve the discovery of novel neuroactive compounds. Here, we used cheminformatics and MTS in the freshwater planarian Dugesia japonica-an invertebrate system used for neurotoxicant testing-to evaluate the extent to which complementary insight could be gained from the two data streams. In this pilot study, our goal was to classify 19 neuroactive compounds into their functional categories: antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants. Drug classification was performed with the same computational methods, using either physicochemical descriptors or planarian behavioral profiling. As it was not obvious a priori which classification method was most suited to this task, we compared the performance of four classification approaches. We used principal coordinate analysis or uniform manifold approximation and projection, each coupled with linear discriminant analysis, and two types of machine learning models-artificial neural net ensembles and support vector machines. Classification based on physicochemical properties had comparable accuracy to classification based on planarian profiling, especially with the machine learning models that all had accuracies of 90-100%. Planarian behavioral MTS correctly identified drugs with multiple therapeutic uses, thus yielding additional information compared to cheminformatics. Given that planarian behavioral MTS is an inexpensive true 3R (refine, reduce, replace) alternative to vertebrate testing and requires zero a priori knowledge about a chemical, it is a promising experimental system to complement in silico cheminformatics to identify new drug candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信