转换中枢神经系统和精神药物产品的挑战:文献综述。

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1177/02698811241301219
Ric M Procyshyn, Martin A Katzman, Howard C Margolese, Ofer Agid, Pierre M Blier
{"title":"转换中枢神经系统和精神药物产品的挑战:文献综述。","authors":"Ric M Procyshyn, Martin A Katzman, Howard C Margolese, Ofer Agid, Pierre M Blier","doi":"10.1177/02698811241301219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Switching between versions of medication products happens commonly despite challenges in achieving bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence. Central nervous system and psychiatric drugs, especially those that are technically demanding to manufacture and have complex pharmacokinetic properties, such as long-acting injectables (LAIs), pose particular challenges to bioequivalence and safe and efficacious drug switching.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether drugs deemed \"bioequivalent\" are truly interchangeable in drug switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the published literature from January 2017 through June 2023 on PubMed using the MeSH terms \"drugs, generic\" OR \"equivalency, generic\" combined with terms for different psychiatric drug classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most of the published studies returned in the search found that switching drug products was safe and clinically comparable, data on most drug classes other than those primarily indicated in the treatment of seizure disorder were sparse. Some studies also provided evidence that real-world outcomes such as adherence and hospitalizations may also be affected by switching. In addition, a review of bioequivalence testing guidance showed inconsistency across agencies and a lack of product-specific guidance from Health Canada, which raises questions about potential claims of bioequivalence for more complex products such as LAIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, given the difficulty in treating mental health disorders, prescribers should be cautious when switching products and formulations in a patient who has been stabilized on a drug.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges for switching central nervous system and psychiatric medication products: A review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Ric M Procyshyn, Martin A Katzman, Howard C Margolese, Ofer Agid, Pierre M Blier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811241301219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Switching between versions of medication products happens commonly despite challenges in achieving bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence. Central nervous system and psychiatric drugs, especially those that are technically demanding to manufacture and have complex pharmacokinetic properties, such as long-acting injectables (LAIs), pose particular challenges to bioequivalence and safe and efficacious drug switching.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether drugs deemed \\\"bioequivalent\\\" are truly interchangeable in drug switching.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed the published literature from January 2017 through June 2023 on PubMed using the MeSH terms \\\"drugs, generic\\\" OR \\\"equivalency, generic\\\" combined with terms for different psychiatric drug classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While most of the published studies returned in the search found that switching drug products was safe and clinically comparable, data on most drug classes other than those primarily indicated in the treatment of seizure disorder were sparse. Some studies also provided evidence that real-world outcomes such as adherence and hospitalizations may also be affected by switching. In addition, a review of bioequivalence testing guidance showed inconsistency across agencies and a lack of product-specific guidance from Health Canada, which raises questions about potential claims of bioequivalence for more complex products such as LAIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, given the difficulty in treating mental health disorders, prescribers should be cautious when switching products and formulations in a patient who has been stabilized on a drug.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241301219\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241301219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在实现生物等效性和治疗等效性方面存在挑战,但药物产品版本之间的切换经常发生。中枢神经系统和精神药物,特别是那些技术要求高且具有复杂药代动力学特性的药物,如长效注射剂(LAIs),对生物等效性和安全有效的药物转换提出了特别的挑战。目的:评估被认为是“生物等效”的药物在药物转换中是否真的可以互换。方法:我们评估了2017年1月至2023年6月在PubMed上发表的文献,使用MeSH术语“药物,仿制药”或“等效性,仿制药”结合不同精神药物类别的术语。结果:虽然在检索中返回的大多数已发表的研究发现转换药物产品是安全的,并且具有临床可比性,但除了主要用于治疗癫痫发作障碍的药物外,大多数药物类别的数据很少。一些研究还提供证据表明,现实世界的结果,如依从性和住院治疗也可能受到转换的影响。此外,对生物等效性测试指南的审查表明,各机构之间存在不一致,加拿大卫生部缺乏针对特定产品的指导,这引发了对诸如lai等更复杂产品的潜在生物等效性声明的质疑。结论:总的来说,考虑到治疗精神健康障碍的困难,处方医生在对药物稳定的患者更换产品和配方时应谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges for switching central nervous system and psychiatric medication products: A review of the literature.

Background: Switching between versions of medication products happens commonly despite challenges in achieving bioequivalence and therapeutic equivalence. Central nervous system and psychiatric drugs, especially those that are technically demanding to manufacture and have complex pharmacokinetic properties, such as long-acting injectables (LAIs), pose particular challenges to bioequivalence and safe and efficacious drug switching.

Aims: To assess whether drugs deemed "bioequivalent" are truly interchangeable in drug switching.

Methods: We assessed the published literature from January 2017 through June 2023 on PubMed using the MeSH terms "drugs, generic" OR "equivalency, generic" combined with terms for different psychiatric drug classes.

Results: While most of the published studies returned in the search found that switching drug products was safe and clinically comparable, data on most drug classes other than those primarily indicated in the treatment of seizure disorder were sparse. Some studies also provided evidence that real-world outcomes such as adherence and hospitalizations may also be affected by switching. In addition, a review of bioequivalence testing guidance showed inconsistency across agencies and a lack of product-specific guidance from Health Canada, which raises questions about potential claims of bioequivalence for more complex products such as LAIs.

Conclusions: Overall, given the difficulty in treating mental health disorders, prescribers should be cautious when switching products and formulations in a patient who has been stabilized on a drug.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信