在团队运动运动员急性和慢性短期重复短跑训练中,血流限制对内外训练负荷指标的影响。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
James R Mckee, Kristen De Marco, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Brendan R Scott
{"title":"在团队运动运动员急性和慢性短期重复短跑训练中,血流限制对内外训练负荷指标的影响。","authors":"James R Mckee, Kristen De Marco, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Brendan R Scott","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined internal, external training loads, internal:external ratios, and aerobic adaptations for acute and short-term chronic repeated-sprint training (RST) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Using randomised crossover (Experiment A) and between-subject (Experiment B) designs, 15 and 24 semi-professional Australian footballers completed two and nine RST sessions, respectively. Sessions comprised three sets of 5-7 × 5-second sprints and 25 seconds recovery, with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion pressure) or without (Non-BFR). Banister's, Edwards', Lucia's training impulse, and session rating of perceived exertion training load (sRPE<sub>TL</sub>) were calculated. External training loads were determined by total work done (TWD). Ventilatory threshold power outputs were assessed during a graded exercise test post-RST. Internal training loads were comparable between conditions, though BFR reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.02) TWD during acute (-4.9%) and short-term chronic (-10.0%) RST compared to Non-BFR. Furthermore, BFR increased (<i>p</i> = 0.049) the sRPE<sub>TL</sub>:TWD ratio during short-term chronic (+14.8%), but not acute RST. First and second ventilatory threshold power outputs improved (+8.3% and + 4.2%, respectively) similarly for both groups following RST. Repeated exposure to progressively overloaded RST with BFR increases internal demands for a given workload, which may promote beneficial physiological adaptations compared to Non-BFR, though aerobic performance was not further enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of blood flow restriction on internal and external training load metrics during acute and chronic short-term repeated-sprint training in team-sport athletes.\",\"authors\":\"James R Mckee, Kristen De Marco, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Brendan R Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined internal, external training loads, internal:external ratios, and aerobic adaptations for acute and short-term chronic repeated-sprint training (RST) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Using randomised crossover (Experiment A) and between-subject (Experiment B) designs, 15 and 24 semi-professional Australian footballers completed two and nine RST sessions, respectively. Sessions comprised three sets of 5-7 × 5-second sprints and 25 seconds recovery, with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion pressure) or without (Non-BFR). Banister's, Edwards', Lucia's training impulse, and session rating of perceived exertion training load (sRPE<sub>TL</sub>) were calculated. External training loads were determined by total work done (TWD). Ventilatory threshold power outputs were assessed during a graded exercise test post-RST. Internal training loads were comparable between conditions, though BFR reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.02) TWD during acute (-4.9%) and short-term chronic (-10.0%) RST compared to Non-BFR. Furthermore, BFR increased (<i>p</i> = 0.049) the sRPE<sub>TL</sub>:TWD ratio during short-term chronic (+14.8%), but not acute RST. First and second ventilatory threshold power outputs improved (+8.3% and + 4.2%, respectively) similarly for both groups following RST. Repeated exposure to progressively overloaded RST with BFR increases internal demands for a given workload, which may promote beneficial physiological adaptations compared to Non-BFR, though aerobic performance was not further enhanced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究检查了内部、外部训练负荷、内部:外部比率和有氧适应急性和短期慢性重复短跑训练(RST)伴血流限制(BFR)。采用随机交叉(实验A)和受试者间(实验B)设计,15名和24名半职业澳大利亚足球运动员分别完成了2次和9次RST测试。疗程包括三组5-7 × 5秒冲刺和25秒恢复,持续BFR(45%动脉闭塞压)或无BFR(非BFR)。计算Banister’s、Edwards’s、Lucia’s训练冲量和运动负荷感知评分(sRPETL)。外部训练负荷由完成的总工作量(TWD)决定。在rst后的分级运动测试中评估通气阈值功率输出。内部训练负荷在两种情况下具有可比性,尽管BFR降低了短期慢性RST(+14.8%)的sRPETL:TWD比率(p p = 0.049),但急性RST没有降低sRPETL:TWD比率。两组在RST后的第一和第二次通气阈值功率输出均有类似的改善(分别为+8.3%和+ 4.2%)。与非BFR相比,反复暴露于逐渐超载的RST和BFR会增加对给定工作量的内部需求,这可能促进有益的生理适应,尽管有氧表现没有进一步提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of blood flow restriction on internal and external training load metrics during acute and chronic short-term repeated-sprint training in team-sport athletes.

This study examined internal, external training loads, internal:external ratios, and aerobic adaptations for acute and short-term chronic repeated-sprint training (RST) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Using randomised crossover (Experiment A) and between-subject (Experiment B) designs, 15 and 24 semi-professional Australian footballers completed two and nine RST sessions, respectively. Sessions comprised three sets of 5-7 × 5-second sprints and 25 seconds recovery, with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion pressure) or without (Non-BFR). Banister's, Edwards', Lucia's training impulse, and session rating of perceived exertion training load (sRPETL) were calculated. External training loads were determined by total work done (TWD). Ventilatory threshold power outputs were assessed during a graded exercise test post-RST. Internal training loads were comparable between conditions, though BFR reduced (p < 0.02) TWD during acute (-4.9%) and short-term chronic (-10.0%) RST compared to Non-BFR. Furthermore, BFR increased (p = 0.049) the sRPETL:TWD ratio during short-term chronic (+14.8%), but not acute RST. First and second ventilatory threshold power outputs improved (+8.3% and + 4.2%, respectively) similarly for both groups following RST. Repeated exposure to progressively overloaded RST with BFR increases internal demands for a given workload, which may promote beneficial physiological adaptations compared to Non-BFR, though aerobic performance was not further enhanced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信