药品零售部门如何确保在突发公共卫生事件期间持续获得药品?从乌干达COVID-19大流行中吸取的教训。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977
Eleanor Hutchinson, Sunday Mundua, Jessica Myers, Sian E Clarke, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Chrispus Mayora, Freddie Ssengooba, Freddy Eric Kitutu
{"title":"药品零售部门如何确保在突发公共卫生事件期间持续获得药品?从乌干达COVID-19大流行中吸取的教训。","authors":"Eleanor Hutchinson, Sunday Mundua, Jessica Myers, Sian E Clarke, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Chrispus Mayora, Freddie Ssengooba, Freddy Eric Kitutu","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medicines retail sector (MRS) enables access to life-saving health commodities. Despite efforts to harness this market for public health goals, in low- and middle-income countries it is rarely incorporated into pandemic preparedness. This paper analyses the role of the MRS in the response to COVID-19 in Uganda, the extent to which it was incorporated into national planning and in the continuity of essential services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using sequential mixed methods in two purposively sampled rural districts in central Uganda. Qualitative research comprised 27 focus group discussions with drug shop vendors (DSVs), pharmacists, clinic staff and community members across two districts (<i>n</i> = 250); key informant interviews at national (<i>n</i> = 6) and district (<i>n</i> = 11) levels. Qualitative findings were used to modify a facility-based survey conducted in MRS outlets (<i>n</i> = 625). A household survey focusing on household dynamics and treatment seeking during COVID-19 was conducted in both districts (<i>n</i> = 1680).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the national level, attempts were made to involve the MRS in policy and technical advice but this was not sustained. At the district level, almost no effort was made to include the MRS in the response to COVID-19. In the community, residents described their reliance on the MRS to provide medicines, especially during lockdowns. Medicine sellers subject to stringent rules on their movement during lockdown, reported some disruptions in tracer medicine stocks and an increase in prices at their suppliers. They adapted, finding new ways to purchase medicines but overall sales of medicines fell.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS is critical to the distribution of medicines in many countries. This remains the case or can be heightened during health crises. Pandemic preparedness must incorporate strategies to support medicine sellers to ensure ongoing access to commodities during public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2418977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does the medicines retail sector ensure continued access to medicines during public health emergencies? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor Hutchinson, Sunday Mundua, Jessica Myers, Sian E Clarke, Kristian Schultz Hansen, Chrispus Mayora, Freddie Ssengooba, Freddy Eric Kitutu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The medicines retail sector (MRS) enables access to life-saving health commodities. Despite efforts to harness this market for public health goals, in low- and middle-income countries it is rarely incorporated into pandemic preparedness. This paper analyses the role of the MRS in the response to COVID-19 in Uganda, the extent to which it was incorporated into national planning and in the continuity of essential services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study using sequential mixed methods in two purposively sampled rural districts in central Uganda. Qualitative research comprised 27 focus group discussions with drug shop vendors (DSVs), pharmacists, clinic staff and community members across two districts (<i>n</i> = 250); key informant interviews at national (<i>n</i> = 6) and district (<i>n</i> = 11) levels. Qualitative findings were used to modify a facility-based survey conducted in MRS outlets (<i>n</i> = 625). A household survey focusing on household dynamics and treatment seeking during COVID-19 was conducted in both districts (<i>n</i> = 1680).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the national level, attempts were made to involve the MRS in policy and technical advice but this was not sustained. At the district level, almost no effort was made to include the MRS in the response to COVID-19. In the community, residents described their reliance on the MRS to provide medicines, especially during lockdowns. Medicine sellers subject to stringent rules on their movement during lockdown, reported some disruptions in tracer medicine stocks and an increase in prices at their suppliers. They adapted, finding new ways to purchase medicines but overall sales of medicines fell.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MRS is critical to the distribution of medicines in many countries. This remains the case or can be heightened during health crises. Pandemic preparedness must incorporate strategies to support medicine sellers to ensure ongoing access to commodities during public health emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2418977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2024.2418977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药品零售部门使人们能够获得拯救生命的保健商品。尽管努力利用这一市场实现公共卫生目标,但在低收入和中等收入国家,很少将其纳入大流行防范工作。本文分析了疫情监测在乌干达应对COVID-19中的作用、纳入国家规划的程度以及基本服务的连续性。方法:我们在乌干达中部的两个有目的的农村地区进行了一项横断面研究,使用顺序混合方法。定性研究包括27个焦点小组讨论,涉及两个地区的药店摊贩、药剂师、诊所工作人员和社区成员(n = 250);在国家(n = 6)和地区(n = 11)层面对关键信息提供者进行访谈。定性调查结果用于修改在MRS网点进行的基于设施的调查(n = 625)。在这两个地区开展了一项家庭调查,重点关注COVID-19期间的家庭动态和治疗寻求情况(n = 1680)。结果:在国家层面上,尝试将MRS纳入政策和技术咨询,但这并没有持续下去。在地区一级,几乎没有做出任何努力将MRS纳入COVID-19的应对工作。在社区,居民们描述了他们依赖MRS提供药物,特别是在封锁期间。在封锁期间受到严格限制的药品销售商报告说,示踪药品库存出现了一些中断,供应商的价格有所上涨。他们进行了调整,找到了购买药品的新方法,但药品的总销量却下降了。结论:MRS对许多国家的药品分配至关重要。这种情况仍然存在,或者在卫生危机期间可能会加剧。大流行防范工作必须纳入支持药品销售商确保在突发公共卫生事件期间持续获得商品的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does the medicines retail sector ensure continued access to medicines during public health emergencies? Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Uganda.

Background: The medicines retail sector (MRS) enables access to life-saving health commodities. Despite efforts to harness this market for public health goals, in low- and middle-income countries it is rarely incorporated into pandemic preparedness. This paper analyses the role of the MRS in the response to COVID-19 in Uganda, the extent to which it was incorporated into national planning and in the continuity of essential services.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using sequential mixed methods in two purposively sampled rural districts in central Uganda. Qualitative research comprised 27 focus group discussions with drug shop vendors (DSVs), pharmacists, clinic staff and community members across two districts (n = 250); key informant interviews at national (n = 6) and district (n = 11) levels. Qualitative findings were used to modify a facility-based survey conducted in MRS outlets (n = 625). A household survey focusing on household dynamics and treatment seeking during COVID-19 was conducted in both districts (n = 1680).

Results: At the national level, attempts were made to involve the MRS in policy and technical advice but this was not sustained. At the district level, almost no effort was made to include the MRS in the response to COVID-19. In the community, residents described their reliance on the MRS to provide medicines, especially during lockdowns. Medicine sellers subject to stringent rules on their movement during lockdown, reported some disruptions in tracer medicine stocks and an increase in prices at their suppliers. They adapted, finding new ways to purchase medicines but overall sales of medicines fell.

Conclusions: The MRS is critical to the distribution of medicines in many countries. This remains the case or can be heightened during health crises. Pandemic preparedness must incorporate strategies to support medicine sellers to ensure ongoing access to commodities during public health emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信