将有组织的锻炼与打断坐姿相结合,比单独使用任何一种策略都更有益于心血管。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024
Courtney R Chang, Angelo Sabag, Monique E Francois
{"title":"将有组织的锻炼与打断坐姿相结合,比单独使用任何一种策略都更有益于心血管。","authors":"Courtney R Chang, Angelo Sabag, Monique E Francois","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 yr) were recruited to undertake three 2-wk interventions in a random order: <i>1</i>) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5,000 steps following the session and on the next day), <i>2</i>) ISIT (2.5-min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and <i>3</i>) HIIT + ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (<i>days 1-3</i>: normal activity, <i>days 4-6</i> sedentary: <5,000 steps/day). Pre- and postassessments included glycemic control (2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 female, 33 ± 5 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, habitual activity 7,156 ± 2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.04 ± 1.20%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared with HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.88 ± 2.03 mL/kg/min, <i>P</i> = 0.01), but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared with HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT + ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although the adverse health effects of sedentary behavior are well-recognized, effective strategies for interrupting such behavior remain unclear. This study demonstrates that combining light-intensity activity breaks throughout the day with structured high-intensity exercise every other day can mitigate some of the cardiovascular consequences associated with prolonged sedentary periods in healthy young adults. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that merely incorporating regular breaks of light-intensity activity may not suffice. These results underscore the importance of regular exercise for cardiovascular health amid sedentary lifestyles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"799-809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-intensity activity breaks combined with alternate day interval training mitigate cardiovascular effects of sedentary behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney R Chang, Angelo Sabag, Monique E Francois\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 yr) were recruited to undertake three 2-wk interventions in a random order: <i>1</i>) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5,000 steps following the session and on the next day), <i>2</i>) ISIT (2.5-min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and <i>3</i>) HIIT + ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (<i>days 1-3</i>: normal activity, <i>days 4-6</i> sedentary: <5,000 steps/day). Pre- and postassessments included glycemic control (2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 female, 33 ± 5 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, habitual activity 7,156 ± 2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.04 ± 1.20%, <i>P</i> = 0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared with HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.88 ± 2.03 mL/kg/min, <i>P</i> = 0.01), but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared with HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT + ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Although the adverse health effects of sedentary behavior are well-recognized, effective strategies for interrupting such behavior remain unclear. This study demonstrates that combining light-intensity activity breaks throughout the day with structured high-intensity exercise every other day can mitigate some of the cardiovascular consequences associated with prolonged sedentary periods in healthy young adults. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that merely incorporating regular breaks of light-intensity activity may not suffice. These results underscore the importance of regular exercise for cardiovascular health amid sedentary lifestyles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"799-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00484.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定短时间的轻强度运动(ISIT)、有组织的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)或两种干预措施的结合是否会带来更大的心脏代谢益处。方法:招募17名健康成人(22-50岁),随机进行3个为期2周的干预:1)HIIT(6个HIIT疗程+结果:11名参与者完成了所有条件(8名女性,33±5岁,23±4 kg/m2,习惯活动7,156±2,272步/天)。与ISIT相比,HIIT+ISIT可显著改善FMD(+1.04±1.20%,p=0.02),而ISIT直接与HIIT比较无显著差异。HIIT+ISIT与ISIT相比,心肺功能明显改善(+1.88±2.03 mL/kg/min, p=0.01),而单纯ISIT与HIIT相比无显著差异。两组之间在血糖控制或身体成分方面没有显著差异。结论:与ISIT相比,HIIT+ISIT对心血管预后的改善更大,而HIIT则没有。有组织的锻炼,如HIIT,可能比仅仅限制久坐的行为所带来的好处要多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-intensity activity breaks combined with alternate day interval training mitigate cardiovascular effects of sedentary behavior.

This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 yr) were recruited to undertake three 2-wk interventions in a random order: 1) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5,000 steps following the session and on the next day), 2) ISIT (2.5-min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and 3) HIIT + ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (days 1-3: normal activity, days 4-6 sedentary: <5,000 steps/day). Pre- and postassessments included glycemic control (2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 female, 33 ± 5 yr, 23 ± 4 kg/m2, habitual activity 7,156 ± 2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.04 ± 1.20%, P = 0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared with HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT + ISIT when compared with ISIT (+1.88 ± 2.03 mL/kg/min, P = 0.01), but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared with HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT + ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared with ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although the adverse health effects of sedentary behavior are well-recognized, effective strategies for interrupting such behavior remain unclear. This study demonstrates that combining light-intensity activity breaks throughout the day with structured high-intensity exercise every other day can mitigate some of the cardiovascular consequences associated with prolonged sedentary periods in healthy young adults. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that merely incorporating regular breaks of light-intensity activity may not suffice. These results underscore the importance of regular exercise for cardiovascular health amid sedentary lifestyles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信