标准围手术期方案的实施减少了短头阻塞性气道综合征手术矫正犬术后呼吸窘迫事件。

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Mason Hill, Mauricio Loria Lepiz, Keila Kazue Ida, Christine Rutter, Kelley Thieman Mankin, Vanna Dickerson
{"title":"标准围手术期方案的实施减少了短头阻塞性气道综合征手术矫正犬术后呼吸窘迫事件。","authors":"Mason Hill, Mauricio Loria Lepiz, Keila Kazue Ida, Christine Rutter, Kelley Thieman Mankin, Vanna Dickerson","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.09.0598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a standardized perioperative protocol for patients undergoing brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery reduces the incidence of regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, and respiratory distress in the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of client-owned dogs referred to the Texas A&M University Small Animal Teaching Hospital for surgical correction of BOAS over 4 years (February 2019 to June 2023) were retrospectively reviewed. A perioperative protocol for patients undergoing surgical correction of BOAS was implemented in June 2021, which included preoperative cisapride and antacid administration, minimizing opioid use, and a slow recovery with nebulization of hypertonic saline. Patient factors, perioperative treatments administered, and complications identified in hospital were recorded and compared between pre- and postprotocol groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postprotocol groups included 42 and 47 dogs, respectively. A significant reduction in postoperative respiratory distress events was identified after protocol implementation (postprotocol, n = 6 [12.77%]; preprotocol, 15 [35.71%]). Postoperative regurgitation (preprotocol, n = 15 [35.71%]; postprotocol, 23 [48.94%]) and aspiration pneumonia events (preprotocol, 4 [9.52%]; postprotocol, 3 [6.38%]) did not differ significantly between groups. More dogs enrolled after protocol implementation experienced historical regurgitation prior to BOAS surgery (postprotocol, n = 31 [65.96%]; preprotocol, 18 [42.86%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized protocol implementation reduced postoperative respiratory distress events, but not postoperative regurgitation nor aspiration pneumonia events, in patients undergoing BOAS surgery at our institution. Prospective studies are required to further assess these findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Veterinarians performing surgery in BOAS patients should consider implementation of a protocol to proactively minimize complications in the postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"590-598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a standard perioperative protocol reduces postoperative respiratory distress events in dogs undergoing surgical correction of brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Mason Hill, Mauricio Loria Lepiz, Keila Kazue Ida, Christine Rutter, Kelley Thieman Mankin, Vanna Dickerson\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/javma.24.09.0598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether a standardized perioperative protocol for patients undergoing brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery reduces the incidence of regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, and respiratory distress in the postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of client-owned dogs referred to the Texas A&M University Small Animal Teaching Hospital for surgical correction of BOAS over 4 years (February 2019 to June 2023) were retrospectively reviewed. A perioperative protocol for patients undergoing surgical correction of BOAS was implemented in June 2021, which included preoperative cisapride and antacid administration, minimizing opioid use, and a slow recovery with nebulization of hypertonic saline. Patient factors, perioperative treatments administered, and complications identified in hospital were recorded and compared between pre- and postprotocol groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre- and postprotocol groups included 42 and 47 dogs, respectively. A significant reduction in postoperative respiratory distress events was identified after protocol implementation (postprotocol, n = 6 [12.77%]; preprotocol, 15 [35.71%]). Postoperative regurgitation (preprotocol, n = 15 [35.71%]; postprotocol, 23 [48.94%]) and aspiration pneumonia events (preprotocol, 4 [9.52%]; postprotocol, 3 [6.38%]) did not differ significantly between groups. More dogs enrolled after protocol implementation experienced historical regurgitation prior to BOAS surgery (postprotocol, n = 31 [65.96%]; preprotocol, 18 [42.86%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized protocol implementation reduced postoperative respiratory distress events, but not postoperative regurgitation nor aspiration pneumonia events, in patients undergoing BOAS surgery at our institution. Prospective studies are required to further assess these findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Veterinarians performing surgery in BOAS patients should consider implementation of a protocol to proactively minimize complications in the postoperative period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"590-598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.09.0598\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.09.0598","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨短头型阻塞性气道综合征(BOAS)手术患者的标准化围手术期方案是否能降低术后返流、吸入性肺炎和呼吸窘迫的发生率。方法:回顾性分析2019年2月至2023年6月4年期间在德州农工大学小动物教学医院进行BOAS手术矫正的客户犬的记录。2021年6月实施了BOAS手术矫正患者的围手术期方案,包括术前西沙必利和抗酸药,尽量减少阿片类药物的使用,并通过高渗盐水雾化缓慢恢复。记录患者因素、围手术期治疗和在医院发现的并发症,并比较方案前后两组。结果:方案前组和方案后组分别有42只和47只狗。方案实施后,术后呼吸窘迫事件显著减少(方案后,n = 6 [12.77%];术前15例[35.71%])。术后返流(方案前,n = 15例[35.71%];方案后,23例[48.94%])和吸入性肺炎事件(方案前,4例[9.52%];治疗后,3[6.38%])各组间无显著差异。方案实施后入组的狗在BOAS手术前出现历史反流的狗较多(方案后,n = 31 [65.96%];术前,18[42.86%])。结论:标准化方案的实施减少了本院BOAS手术患者术后呼吸窘迫事件,但没有减少术后返流和吸入性肺炎事件。需要前瞻性研究来进一步评估这些发现。临床相关性:兽医在对BOAS患者进行手术时应考虑实施一项方案,以主动减少术后并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a standard perioperative protocol reduces postoperative respiratory distress events in dogs undergoing surgical correction of brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome.

Objective: To determine whether a standardized perioperative protocol for patients undergoing brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome (BOAS) surgery reduces the incidence of regurgitation, aspiration pneumonia, and respiratory distress in the postoperative period.

Methods: The records of client-owned dogs referred to the Texas A&M University Small Animal Teaching Hospital for surgical correction of BOAS over 4 years (February 2019 to June 2023) were retrospectively reviewed. A perioperative protocol for patients undergoing surgical correction of BOAS was implemented in June 2021, which included preoperative cisapride and antacid administration, minimizing opioid use, and a slow recovery with nebulization of hypertonic saline. Patient factors, perioperative treatments administered, and complications identified in hospital were recorded and compared between pre- and postprotocol groups.

Results: The pre- and postprotocol groups included 42 and 47 dogs, respectively. A significant reduction in postoperative respiratory distress events was identified after protocol implementation (postprotocol, n = 6 [12.77%]; preprotocol, 15 [35.71%]). Postoperative regurgitation (preprotocol, n = 15 [35.71%]; postprotocol, 23 [48.94%]) and aspiration pneumonia events (preprotocol, 4 [9.52%]; postprotocol, 3 [6.38%]) did not differ significantly between groups. More dogs enrolled after protocol implementation experienced historical regurgitation prior to BOAS surgery (postprotocol, n = 31 [65.96%]; preprotocol, 18 [42.86%]).

Conclusions: Standardized protocol implementation reduced postoperative respiratory distress events, but not postoperative regurgitation nor aspiration pneumonia events, in patients undergoing BOAS surgery at our institution. Prospective studies are required to further assess these findings.

Clinical relevance: Veterinarians performing surgery in BOAS patients should consider implementation of a protocol to proactively minimize complications in the postoperative period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信